Britney nudie

email this story
read comments (13)
post a comment

Every online go-getter has been publishing that nude Britney Spears photo that will adorn the August issue of Harper's Bazaar. I'm hours behind the pack (blame Superman Returns and James Ellroy) but no harm in following suit.

I'm guessing that sometime tomorrow morning an e-mail from an attorney for the magazine will arrive telling me to take it down or else...but maybe not. Remember when Spears was hot and thin? She's obviously pregnant now, but during her recovery period from the last baby she was a sea lion.

Ellroy's De-Solve<< previous | next >>Bunnies Not Funny

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on June 28, 2006 at 4:12 PM

comment #1

Farley C says ...

What recovery period? She was pregnant again almost immediately. That photo is severely retouched. (What a surprise.) I am positive she's not that thin. Even a couple months ago.

Posted by Farley C at June 28, 2006 5:43 PM

comment #2

delbomber says ...

Why is she still famous?

Posted by delbomber at June 28, 2006 6:04 PM

comment #3

Anonymous says ...

"She's obviously pregnant now, but during her recovery period from the last baby she was a sea lion."

Jeff's deep love and respect for the opposite sex is downright touching sometimes.

Posted by Anonymous at June 28, 2006 6:05 PM

comment #4

J.C. says ...

Just a couple of weeks ago, she seems to cry honest tears over being harrassed 24/7 by stalkerazzi. I sort of felt bad for her. But, c'mon, with no album or film or other project to promote, she poses nude for the cover of a national magazine. If you want to be left alone, then GO AWAY.

Posted by J.C. at June 28, 2006 6:05 PM

comment #5

Anonymous says ...

http://www.juiceenewsdaily.com/index.php/2006/06/28/britney-spears-naked-pregnant-pictures-a-shock-to-fans/

Here's the rest of them.

Posted by Anonymous at June 28, 2006 6:11 PM

comment #6

James says ...

That pose was really an eye-opener when Demi Moore struck it 16 years ago. Now it's just further proof that Britney has completely run out of ideas (if, in fact, she ever had any) and will do absolutely anything to stay in the papers. I don't know a soul who still cares about anything she does, yet she continues to show up regularly in the gossip pages; her publicist must owe a lot of people a lot of favors. At least Paris Hilton has a record to sell. What's Britney peddling? The upcoming DVD box set of CHAOTIC? Or just another tear-drenched interview about how wonderful her marriage is and how dreadful it is to attract so much unwanted attention?

Posted by James at June 28, 2006 7:23 PM

comment #7

Bob says ...

Thing is... for a woman who's "with child" after not exactly having "recovered" from haivng been so before, and recently, her body ain't THAT bad in the (obviously retouched) photos at all. But faces.. faces are harder to retouch, and based on such her skin and complexion is awful-looking, total turn-off. Too bad.

Posted by Bob at June 28, 2006 9:06 PM

comment #8

sceptic21 says ...

"Remember when Spears was hot and thin? She's obviously pregnant now, but during her recovery period from the last baby she was a sea lion."

... hot and thin??? sounds just like more chauvinistic vagina-envy -- sorry boys that you are not the life-givers -- not every woman has succombed to your bulimic and anorexic agenda -- yeah, hot and thin -- as if hot is defined as thin -- exactly how thin does a woman have to be to meet your judgmental sexist requirements -- how much do you weigh Jeff or ..oh, I forgot we aren't allowed to pass judgment on man's appearance, which in your case seem to match your intellect -- both appear to be quite "thin" indeed!

Posted by sceptic21 at June 29, 2006 10:14 AM

comment #9

Anonymous says ...

When did we help crash Juice News Daily? It's down.

Posted by Anonymous at June 29, 2006 10:43 AM

comment #10

Dave Poland's Gut says ...

Just the thing that will get her career back. Posing nude in an irrelevant magazine while pregant!

YES!

Posted by Dave Poland's Gut at June 29, 2006 12:17 PM

comment #11

Rich says ...

In the Matt Lauer interview she looked really "white trashy" - puffy, unkempt, tasteless jewelry. At least these photos have some elegance. But I totally agree with some of the earlier posters about sympathy for her privacy. Desire for attention seems to be more pathological with her than most celebrities. How can we miss you if you won't go away?

Posted by Rich at June 29, 2006 1:44 PM

comment #12