Sinatra "Snakes"
There are probably thousands who aren't getting what that 8.4.06 EW cover with Samuel L. Jackson [three or four items below] is about. It's a little obscure if you're not a Frank Sinatra fan as well as a bit of a vinyl freak, but it's a riff on the cover art for Sinatra's 1957 Capitol album "Come Fly With Me."
White on Farrell<< previous
|
next >>Robinson blasts Lohan
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on July 28, 2006 at 10:42 AM
comment #1
Nick says ...
Probably the most intresting thing EW has done since........................................im drawing a blank here, lil help?
Posted by Nick at July 28, 2006 11:49 AM
comment #2
TPK says ...
The Dixie Chicks cover.
Posted by TPK at July 28, 2006 12:05 PM
comment #3
Joe Greenia says ...
I missed it and that's one of my favorite Sinatra LPs. Billy May, great stuff.
Posted by Joe Greenia at July 28, 2006 12:13 PM
comment #4
Joel says ...
The cover photo is no doubt more creative than the film... par for the course with this whole tiresome SOAP "phenomenon."
Posted by Joel at July 28, 2006 1:30 PM
comment #5
Anonymous says ...
..because....of course, joel has seen the film and therefore is qualified to make such a snarky comment. why the hatin' joel?
Posted by Anonymous at July 28, 2006 1:39 PM
comment #6
Joey Bishop says ...
Mr. Jackson, I know Frank Sinatra, and you my friend are no Mr. Sinatra.
Posted by Joey Bishop at July 28, 2006 2:49 PM
comment #7
Anonymous says ...
"get those motherfuckin' nazis off my motherfuckin' train!!!"
-Col. Joseph Ryan
Posted by Anonymous at July 28, 2006 3:22 PM
comment #8
Aladdin Sane says ...
I like the cover. I'm gonna have to pick it up. The whole spread looks good too.
Posted by Aladdin Sane at July 28, 2006 6:46 PM
comment #9
Snakes on Tony Bennett says ...
Everyone at Comic-Con was raving about Sinatra. That's all those geeks think about: lounge music.
Posted by Snakes on Tony Bennett at July 29, 2006 1:44 AM
comment #10
ArchiveGuy says ...
Great catch, Jeff. Maybe not a great album, but admittedly a lot of fun (hopefully, we can say the same thing about "Snakes", though the EW article doesn't really clarify anything, unsurprisingly)
Posted by ArchiveGuy at July 31, 2006 3:38 PM