July 2
July 3
July 4
Diminished Capacity
Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson
We are Together
July 9
July 11
August
Eight Miles High
Journey to the Center of the Earth
Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
July 18
A Very British Gangster
Before I Forget
Felon
Lou Reed's Berlin
Transsiberian
July 22
July 23
Nobody's bothered by Scarlett Johansson agreeing to play the title role in Mary, Queen of Scots in a forthcoming mid-budgeted historical drama on top of already playing Mary Boleyn (older sister of Natalie Portman's Anne) in The Other Boleyn Girl for producer Scott Rudin and Columbia Pictures? The two characters were almost alive at the same time. (Anne Boleyn was born in 1504 and died of a severed head in 1536. Mary Queen of Scots was born in 1542 and died in early 1587.) I don't mean to carp, but I already have issues with Johansson being in period dramas in the first place.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on September 28, 2006 at 03:43 PM
Posted by JD
at September 28, 2006 04:13 PM
Posted by Breedlove
at September 28, 2006 04:27 PM
Posted by Midwest Doug
at September 28, 2006 04:31 PM
comment #4
says ...Scarlett has gone past overexposure a long time ago, yet the prospect of seeing her and Natalie Portman together on screen sounds interesting, and not just for the obvious reasons (i.e. corseted eye candy). I can just picture discussions about who is a better actress and who stole the movie from whom (my money is on Portman to deliver the goods and Johansson to underwhelm in her performance, but that's just me).
Posted by Dennis_C
at September 28, 2006 06:17 PM
comment #5
says ...Scarlett does have some limitations, but what's good about her should only improve. Some of her critics ignore how young she is and that she is still learning how to act. She may never be a Hepburn (either one) or a Streep, but the camera certainly does love her. Except for The Island, she makes interesting choices. My interest in Black Dahlia, which I'm slightly embarrassed to say I almost liked, perked up whenever she was on screen. And JD is right. I've been reading JW since the Mr. Hollywood days with great pleasure. He alerts me to things I'm not aware of. His quirky opinions are entertaining. Yet lately, he doesn't seem aware of how increasingly negative he is becoming. Perhaps it's been some time since he's catch a ride on the nookie train. Meanwhile, maybe Scarlett and Sofia could corner him in some dark LA alley and make a case for themselves with a couple of baseball bats.
Posted by T. S. Idiot
at September 28, 2006 06:32 PM
Posted by Breedlove
at September 28, 2006 06:52 PM
Posted by Arran
at September 28, 2006 08:12 PM
Posted by DarthCorleone
at September 28, 2006 09:13 PM
Posted by Hallick
at September 28, 2006 09:22 PM
comment #10
says ...Scarlett can't act.
She should stick to Bob Dylan videos and Maxim photoshoots.
Posted by Goulet
at September 28, 2006 09:23 PM
comment #11
says ...I'm almost surprised that Portman would want to be in a period piece with Johansson. Say what you will about Scarlett, but she definitely has the goods to fill out the costumes. Natalie, as beautiful as she is, definitely does not. Looking back on Keira in POTC, though, I must admit that pushup bras can do wonders.
Posted by Rich S.
at September 29, 2006 04:57 AM
comment #12
says ...It would help if you remember that Scarlett is playing Mary Boleyn (1507-1543) and not Anne. At least compare the right historical characters.
Posted by TheLongshot
at September 29, 2006 07:23 AM
Posted by Doug
at September 30, 2006 04:18 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)