The Envelope "Buzzometer" is up and running...sort of. Only five or six of the ten contributors -- USA Today's Claudia Puig, Comingsoon.net's Edward Douglas, Newsday's Gene Seymour, myself, the Chicago Tribune's Michael Phillips, Hollywood Wiretap's Pete Hammond (one of the slackers), Rolling Stone's Peter Travers, Ebert & Roeper's Richard Roeper, and The Envelope 's Steve Pond and Tom O'Neil -- are there, but I guess everyone will be along by the end of the month.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on October 20, 2006 at 6:06 PM
comment #1
bipedalist
says ...
It looks and all (what a difference thousands of dollars, a team of designers and millions of readers can do, eh?) but Sienna Miller? Seems to me like that's a prediction, not taking the buzz temp of what's going on right now. Miller is a tabloid darling who refused to lose weight to play barfing Edie. What makes people think she's such a strong contender? Usually when their tabloid life overshadows their work AMPAS takes a pass.
Posted by bipedalist
at October 20, 2006 9:06 PM
comment #2
JET
says ...
Oscar nomination for Sienna Miller ??? NO WAY
I'm sorry but I still remember Sienna Miller, after last year's Academy Awards, trying to have public sex with Sean Penn at the bar of the Chateau Marmont Hotel on Sunset Strip, in full view of hundreds of Hollywood producers, directors, and other moguls.
In "Factory Girl" Sienna Miller attempts to portray Edie Sedgwick, who was a real life muse of PITTSBURGH'S Andy Warhol.
After Sienna Miller's RECENT crude comments and bizarre DIVA behavior in Pittsburgh during the filming of "The Mysteries of Pittsburgh", do you really think that the hundreds of producers, directors, actors and writers in Hollywood that were either born in Pittsburgh or attended College in Pittsburgh would ever vote for the idiot Sienna Miller ???
Harvey & Bob Weinstein, save your money instead of wasting it on a Sienna Miller campaign.
Posted by JET
at October 27, 2006 2:56 AM