I ran across a sloppily-written item that briefly piqued my interest because it ties into Emilio Estevez's Bobby (Weinstein Co., 11.17). L.A.-based culture journalist Dianne Bates Kenney (of Bates Rates News) tells about having met a commercial photographer named Eric Saarinen several years ago and hearing a fascinating story about footage he captured of the shooting of Robert F. Kennedy at the Ambassador Hotel on June 4,1968. At first the story gets you, then it drives you mad because of the details she ignores.
According to Saarinen, Kenney writes, he "and a friend were filming Kennedy and followed him after he exited the [Ambassador ballroom] podium. They captured Kennedy as he fell after being shot as well as the scramble of the people around him. They went back to the campus, made a copy of the film and locked the original in one of their lockers.
"Then, Saarinen said, both students, overwhelmed by what they had witnessed, 'sat on the street corner and proceeded to get very drunk.' They were approached by a strange man and while under the influence, told him what they had just seen and filmed. They assured him that the original film was safely locked in a locker. The next day, when they went to the locker, the film was gone."
Okay...so what happened to the copy Saarinen said they made? The original, the story suggests, was stolen by the "strange man" (strange in what way? was he oddly dressed?) who somehow knew which locker the original film was stored in. Did Saarinen and his friend tell this total stranger how to find it? They must have been awfully damn stupid on top of being dead drunk. In any case, the story clearly states that a copy was made, so where is it? And has this story ever been passed along to anyone before, and was the whereabouts of the copy ever investigated?
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on October 16, 2006 at 11:40 AM
comment #1
Loening
says ...
This sounds very fishy to me. A "strange man." Perhaps he was a drunken apparition. Sounds like someone just trying to get attention. The reality is there are so many theories about RFK's assination but none of them have ever played out (from Eugene Caesar being the second gunman to the "girl in the poka dotted dress" theory). Generally, if there is a conspiracy word gets out. It just human nature. It's why Nixon couldn't keep the lid on Watergate and why Clinton couldn't get away with never having "sexual relations with that woman." People like to blab. On top of that you've got Sirhan still sitting up in San Quentin. Surely after almost forty years in prison, he would blab. No it is as likely Sirhan acted alone just as it is likely Lee Harvey Oswald got of three lucky shots. You just can't contain a conspiracy. It goes back throughout human history... "Et tu Brute," baby...
Posted by Loening
at October 16, 2006 1:36 PM
comment #2
drturing
says ...
Not to mention it's near impossible to make a "copy of film" immediately.
Posted by drturing
at October 16, 2006 6:10 PM