July 2
July 3
July 4
Diminished Capacity
Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson
We are Together
July 9
July 11
August
Eight Miles High
Journey to the Center of the Earth
Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
July 18
A Very British Gangster
Before I Forget
Felon
Lou Reed's Berlin
Transsiberian
July 22
July 23
Tony Scott's lame ideas for reconstructing Walter Hill's The Warriors is another case of a hip Hollywood guy (and his chortling corporate backers) showing obesiance before the power of street machismo, or the wild west factor in urban culture. Establishing a bond with all this links to a general connection with urban audiences and presumed loyalty down the road. In short, a good business move.

You homies are the shit and the style...predatory turf monsters with fierce expressions and shaved heads and big developed biceps, and you know how fast and cool I can be. (Check out Domino.) And I want to make a film that reflects and worships you and your hard culture (violence, bling, fast money, hot cars, ho's) to the hilt. Trust me when I say that no amount of grovelling or cinematic fellatio is beyond my bounds.
Scott money quote #1: "I really hate remakes, but the The Warriors is one of my all time favorite movies, and what I'm doing is kind of reinventing it. And rather than a gang it¹s going to be 30 guys who take on 3,000. It's Kingdom Of Heaven meets The Warriors. We're going to use the L.A. river bed as a major location."
Scott money quote #2: "I've been meeting all the [real] gang leaders, they¹re saying they¹ll sign this treaty for the duration of the shoot. I want this shot of 50,000 real gang members all on Long Beach -- tThe Crips, The Bloods, the Vietnamese, the Cambodians, the 18th Street gang... all there. It's going to be cool."
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on November 28, 2006 at 07:59 AM
comment #1
says ...Wow Jeff, you are begining to worry me
This sounds SO FUCKING COOL!!! what the hell is wrong with you?!?!?
The Warriors was a great-for-its-time action movie that plays out in extremely dated fashion by today's standards. Not to say that it's a bad action flick, as I love most of Walter Hill's output. But this is one flick that could stand a re-imagining, and I for one am just fuckin' giddy about the prospects of a completely balls-out Tony Scott style remake.
Jeff--what did you think of Deja Vu, or have you still not seen it yet?
And honestly man, what's going on with you lately? So much hate and bile and anger coming out of you....I love your site but it's been a turn-off the last few weeks...
Posted by actionman
at November 28, 2006 09:06 AM
comment #2
says ...no actionman, this sounds totally UNCOOL.
THE WARRIORS is an urban comic book and this "reimagining" is a shallow white dude's idea of street cred. you don't need to even see this just imagine it in your head: hear the ludacris beats! see the flash frame elliptical action scenes! behold the washed out orange glow of LA!
tony scott keeps it real!
Posted by christian
at November 28, 2006 09:31 AM
comment #3
says ...no actionman, this sounds totally UNCOOL.
THE WARRIORS is an urban comic book and this "reimagining" is a shallow white dude's idea of street cred. you don't need to even see this just imagine it in your head: hear the ludacris beats! see the flash frame elliptical action scenes! behold the washed out orange glow of LA!
tony scott keeps it real!
Posted by christian
at November 28, 2006 09:32 AM
Posted by christian
at November 28, 2006 09:32 AM
Posted by The Movie Man
at November 28, 2006 09:37 AM
Posted by Monument
at November 28, 2006 09:44 AM
Posted by actionman
at November 28, 2006 10:11 AM
comment #8
says ...50,000 gang members in one place....I want to be caught in that traffic jam.
There should just be a movie about this movie and what the hell goes wrong when somebody decides to get a bit of revenge on the set. The whole movie could be about Tony Scott trying to get his ass home and not get killed by gangbangers or beaten senseless by cops who are pissed at Tony's project. There's reimagining.
Posted by corey3rd
at November 28, 2006 10:41 AM
Posted by KunDunz
at November 28, 2006 10:45 AM
Posted by D.Z.
at November 28, 2006 11:15 AM
Posted by christian
at November 28, 2006 11:32 AM
comment #12
says ...I can see it now! Computer generated gangs! CG fights! CG Baseball Furies! CG explosions! CG Rogue-mobile! And that cool filter that makes the sky all orange no matter what time of day it is. And a cool CG scene where a six-year-old girl playing in her living room gets part of her head blown off by a stray bullet from a 9mm fired by one gang member at another because he dissed him! That'll be AWESOME!
Posted by Walter Sobchak
at November 28, 2006 11:42 AM
Posted by actionman
at November 28, 2006 12:06 PM
Posted by Walter Sobchak
at November 28, 2006 12:13 PM
Posted by actionman
at November 28, 2006 12:23 PM
Posted by siamesecat
at November 28, 2006 12:26 PM
Posted by actionman
at November 28, 2006 12:42 PM
Posted by Argen
at November 28, 2006 02:18 PM
Posted by actionman
at November 28, 2006 03:13 PM
Posted by donnyboy
at November 28, 2006 04:33 PM
comment #21
says ...True. But when you say "to coin a phrase" it means... oh, never mind.
To stay on topic, Scott can do what he wants with THE WARRIORS as long as he's not burning all remaining prints of the original. That way I can avoid his and watch the Hill version until I'm a very old man. It may be dated, but it is a piece of art.
Posted by Argen
at November 28, 2006 04:34 PM
Posted by corey3rd
at November 28, 2006 04:59 PM
Posted by donnyboy
at November 28, 2006 05:16 PM
Posted by actionman
at November 28, 2006 05:33 PM
comment #25
says ...Tony might actually have a few good ideas, but put them in a movie that isn't a 'Warriors' remake.
I have no need to see a bunch of slow-mo'ed half-wits trying to look tough and invoke the 'wack' natural of the original.
All I can figure is Tony is trying to ape some of the coolness that will result from Ridley's 'American Gangster' next year.
Posted by MPNeeb
at November 28, 2006 11:30 PM
Posted by Dave Polands Gut
at November 29, 2006 07:31 AM
Posted by actionman
at November 29, 2006 08:59 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)