July 2
July 3
July 4
Diminished Capacity
Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson
We are Together
July 9
July 11
August
Eight Miles High
Journey to the Center of the Earth
Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
July 18
A Very British Gangster
Before I Forget
Felon
Lou Reed's Berlin
Transsiberian
July 22
July 23
Dreamgirls will have roughly a $40 million cume by Monday night (1.1.07), but can it reach $100 million over the next four weeks? Big financial earnings in all sectors are seen as an indicator of Oscar potency, after all. And let's face it -- between now and the end of January (or early February) is the peak earning time for this DreamWorks musical. If it cleans up in the Oscar nominations (which are being announced on Tuesday, 1.23), its hand will obviously be strengthened. But by how much?
It reportedly made $4.7 million yesterday (Friday) compared to $8.7 million on opening day last Monday (12.25). To hit $100 mill by it needs to take in another $60 million over the next four weeks, but I'm guessing (tell me if I'm wrong) that it's not looking at much more than a $12 to $14 million haul next weekend, tops...perhaps less.
Bottom line: if it doesn't score with multi-Oscar nominations across the board three weeks and three days from now, Dreamgirls will stall somewhere south of $100 million. Can it still win the Best Picture Oscar with only a respectable (as opposed to astronomical) box-office tally? Sure -- if people want it to win, it'll win. But won't this make it a tad harder?
Chicago ended up with $170,687,518 domestic, yes, but maybe it's not fair to expect a musical with a somewhat restricted demographic (if I explain what it is I'll be called a racist homophobe, right?) to make $100 million-plus. I don't know. You tell me. Some feel it's bad form to bring up racial matters in discussing box-office potency, but it's a fact of American life. It's nice to think we're all clever, classless and free, but the lyrics from Randy Newman's "Rednecks" still apply in some areas, sorry to say.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on December 30, 2006 at 09:44 AM
comment #1
says ...Didn't Chicago go into the Oscar nominations with something like $50 million in grosses? If Dreamgirls has, say, $75 mil in the bank by the time the nominations are announced -- and even if it doesn't wind up winning Best Picture, it'll at the very least score nominations for picture, director, supporting actress, and some song noms, as well as a slew of technical nominations, allowing it to brag that it's been "nominated for 7 Academy Awards" or what-have-you -- I have a hard time imagining it won't drag its way across the $100 million line. (My bet would be on at least 8 noms -- picture, director, supporting actor for Murphy, supporting actress for Hudson, original song for "Listen", costumes, cinematography and set design.)
Posted by TKC
at December 30, 2006 10:50 AM
Posted by vansmith
at December 30, 2006 10:56 AM
comment #3
says ...To say that this movie only appeals to black people and gay men at this point is preposterous. If it were a present-day, hip-hop thing, then maybe. But a movie with a '60s-Motown backdrop and a (possibly) Oscar-nominated Eddie Murphy? That's baby-boomer catnip, especially as it's being sold as an "event". $100M easily.
Posted by Mike Schaefer
at December 30, 2006 11:05 AM
comment #4
says ...According to IMDB, "Chicago" only grossed $50,631,500, by January 31st, so "Dreamgirls" is well ahead of the game, if we are going by "Chicago" numbers. Chicago didn't hit $100 million until the last week in February. Actually Oscars noms helped "Chicago" gain most of its box office gross, so noma will only aid "Dreamgirls" by broadening its audience even more.
Posted by kmoore
at December 30, 2006 11:20 AM
comment #5
says ...Saw this last night in Vancouver, Canada, crowd was 18-34 demographic, 3/4 packed theatre. Sad to say the audience was laughing during some of the musical performances ("We are Family;" Hudson's stand-out "Aint going nowhere" song). Also seemed like there was a sense of dread that any musical number was starting up after the hour/hour and half mark. Performances were solid (who knew Eddie Murphy could be devaastating) and the movie was fun, but i'd suggest my opinion was the minority.
Posted by lastmanback
at December 30, 2006 11:33 AM
Posted by kmoore
at December 30, 2006 11:43 AM
Posted by kmoore
at December 30, 2006 11:46 AM
Posted by Dixon Steele
at December 30, 2006 06:49 PM
Posted by Matthew Lucas
at December 30, 2006 11:34 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)