"If we are to believe that the Golden Globe nominations will have a direct effect on Academy (and Guild) voting patterns, then it must be said pictures like World Trade Center, The Good German, The Good Shepherd, Children Of Men, The Prestige, The Illusionist and The Painted Veil...have been voted off the island," writes Hollywood Wiretap's Pete Hammond in his just-up Globe nom reaction piece.

"Annette Bening, an early favorite would seem to be a dark horse now despite a Globe comedy nomination. Will Smith is the only thing keeping the high hopes of Pursuit of Happyness. Peter O’Toole, the sentimental favorite is now an underdog to emerging front-runner Forest Whitaker. In fact, Whitaker’s Last King and Helen Mirren’s Queen look like good bets to become Oscar royalty as well and have pretty much run the board proving critics, like Academy voters, are duly impressed when actors play well-known real life figures.
"In the battle of the 9/11 films, World Trade Center was dissed while Universal has steered United 93 into position with significant notice from N.Y., D.C., L.A. and S.F. critics groups, a mention on the AFI list and a BFCA nom but the lack of Globe nominations might be troubling in going forward to Oscar. United 93 boosters should take heart from The Thin Red Line which was completely shut out in the Globes but went on to 7 Oscar noms including Best Picture in 1998.
"But will the many reluctant Academy members who have resisted popping their screeners into their DVD players feel they have to watch now? The jury is out but at least one member told us that while he has given it some renewed thought he still has no interest in seeing the movie, critical acclaim or not."
queen2
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on December 14, 2006 at 9:33 AM
comment #1
kyle21
says ...
...and we know Academy members feel NO OBLIGATION to watch nominated films, and so it goes. Another year..."crash"ing down
Posted by kyle21
at December 14, 2006 10:11 AM
comment #2
Mike Schaefer
says ...
I realize Supp Actor was a crowded field, but it's interesting they bypassed Michael Sheen (despite showing love for The Queen) and Stanley Tucci (while deservedly nominating Emily Blunt) in favor of Affleck and Wahlberg.
Posted by Mike Schaefer
at December 14, 2006 10:50 AM
comment #3
tholl-yung
says ...
Wha?, no Daniel Craig?
http://hollywood.outsidethebeltway.com/category/hunks/daniel-craig/
Posted by tholl-yung
at December 14, 2006 11:08 AM
comment #4
dre
says ...
I'm surprised about Sheen being passed also..though I completely spaced out in our recap article today (http://ropeofsilicon.com/news.php?id=4882). what a dummy. Love the whalberg nomination
Posted by dre
at December 14, 2006 11:10 AM
comment #5
Fudge Ripple
says ...
I would guess that, having thrown Emilio Estevez a bone with the "Bobby" nom, the voters felt they had done enough for the Sheens.
Yes, I'm joking.
Posted by Fudge Ripple
at December 14, 2006 12:28 PM
comment #6
Dave Polands Gut
says ...
The Bobby nom is an embarrassment.
On par with Pia Zadora.
Posted by Dave Polands Gut
at December 14, 2006 12:38 PM
comment #7
thatmovieguy
says ...
"The Bobby nom is an embarrassment. On par with Pia Zadora."
Agreed. When I saw BOBBY, the audience began snickering about 20 minutes into it and never stopped. The Globe voters must have been too stunned by the big names in the cast to pay attention to the soppy screenplay. Noble intentions, mediocre results.
Posted by thatmovieguy
at December 16, 2006 8:53 AM