Wanting in on the Eddie Murphy smackdown, The Envelope's Tom O'Neil is recalling some some righteous/conten- tious thoughts that Murphy passed along at the Oscar podium exactly 20 years ago (which would be....uhm, 1987). Murphy "told the audience that he originally planned to refuse the Oscars' request to present the award for best picture," O'Neil writes, "because 'they haven't recognized black people in the motion picture industry' -- noting that only three African-Americans had won an acting award over the past 60 years.
"I'll probably never win an Oscar for saying this," Murphy remarked. "Actually, I might not be in any trouble because the way it's been going, it's about every 20 years we get one, so we ain't due until about 2004."
I don't see how this throws any kerosene on the fire, frankly. More like water. I respect Murphy for standing up and saying what he did -- anybody would. But that was then and this is now.
It may be pointless to try and further explain myself, but I've just been saying what any veteran of this town would acknowledge and then chuckle about at a party, buzzed or sober. Murphy is a pissed-off, guarded, obviously gifted comic performer who has never laid it on the line in terms of heavyweight acting, and there's no absolutely way he's laying it on the line in Dreamgirls. Like Peter Howell said, he's doing his SNL James Brown shtick. Plus the part isn't written with any third-act payoffs. It's one of the most bizarre and groundless acting nominations in Oscar history.
It's not just the calibre of a performance -- substantial character construction and some kind of semi-meaningful arc (or journey) have to be there also. And the writing in the Dreamgirls script that would accomplish this just isn't there. James Thunder Early is an amalgam of famous black performers -- barely a character, and certainly not a character with any intriguing turns, deepenings and/or crescendo moments -- this is who I am, what I want, what I need, please love me, I don't care if you love me...anything along those lines.
The Oscar nom is much more of a referendum on Murphy himself -- some half-assed notion of a career comeback, his likability in the early to mid '80s, his current asshole-ishness (see the Razor item), the p.c. positiveness that comes with giving an Oscar to any person of color, etc. And in that light, the thought of him winning the Oscar almost gives me indigestion. I'm serious...I can feel the turbulence building in my stomach as I write this. And the Oscar goes to....Norbit!
Anyway, O'Neil's thing works for today, there's the New York Post story (allegedly) coming out tomorrow...but then what? Burnout, most likely.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on February 3, 2007 at 8:37 AM
comment #1
bipedalist
says ...
Oh so he once was a good guy? Egg on face, Wells, egg on face.
Posted by bipedalist
at February 3, 2007 9:29 AM
comment #2
Alex
says ...
It's another case of rewarding the right actor for the wrong movie. If when you say, Murphy hasn't done any "heavyweight" acting, you mean he hasn't had any serious, deep, Oscar-bait roles, then that is fine, but he has done some excellent acting.
The scenes in "The Nutty Professor" and "Coming to America" where he portrays 4 to 5 different characters in one scene completely flawlessly, with uniqueness and humor in each character is some of the greatest comedic acting ever.
I'd like to see Forest Whitaker or Will Smith do that.
Posted by Alex
at February 3, 2007 9:52 AM
comment #3
EDouglas
says ...
This is becoming the best perpetual motion NON-story on the web since that Zyzzyx Road story on CHUD.
BiP: Looks to me like Tom O'Neil's Oscar memory has helped back-up Jeff's reasoning for thinking Murphy might buck the odds and be snubbed by the Academy... though I don't think anyone in the Academy has as good a memory as Tom. (Actually, I guess Jeff isn't saying Murphy won't win as much as that he shouldn't win, for other reasons which have little to do with the performance on screen.)
Posted by EDouglas
at February 3, 2007 10:06 AM
comment #4
christian
says ...
jerry lewis had it half-right when he said there were a thousand guys that could do his part in KING OF COMEDY but nobody could do THE NUTTY PROFESSOR. of course, murphy was brilliant in his version and should have received his best oscar nom right there. watch the scene where's he's insulted by the club comic and later walks forlornly from his date's door. beautiful.
we don't need to see eddie murphy doing shakeespeare. if he stuck to smarter comedies, five minutes of which his SNL time is funnier than ten of his films, then i'd be all for him.
but come on jeff. let's get back to somethin' important.
Posted by christian
at February 3, 2007 10:44 AM
comment #5
Mcflyboy
says ...
I believe Rick Baker was right, when he, in his recent interview with Entertainment Weekly, said that he saw Dreamgirls and Eddie was great, but he was nowhere near as good as he was in Nutty Professor 1 and 2. Regardless of how you feel about those films, Jeff, he was brilliant. He gave every chraacter a different personality with great little nuances. That's the kind of acting that will NEVER be acknowledged by the Academy and its a damn shame.
Eddie may be a standoff-ish asshole but I honestly have no problem with him getting an Oscar as a career award rather than a single performance one. And I am looking forward to Norbit. That "i'm slidin" line in the trailer gets me everytime.
Posted by Mcflyboy
at February 3, 2007 3:19 PM