Steven Spielberg has told N.Y. Times reporter Laura M. Holson that he "insisted, contractually, on autonomy for DreamWorks if I was going to continue under the Paramount and Viacom funding arrangement. So I take exception when the press is contacted by our friends and partners at Paramount, who refer to every DreamWorks picture as a Paramount picture. It is not the case."
Spielberg and DreamWorks production chief Stacey Snider, who also talked to Holson, are clearly irritated with Paramount chairman Brad Grey's tendency to try and take credit for as much stuff as he can. I don't know if the term "credit hog" fully applies, but Grey does seem to be so inclined And now Spielberg is saying to Grey in a public forum, "Back off, chill...we're feeling threatened in terms of our identity."
There's definitely been an impression since early last year that Paramount is so entwined with DreamWorks that neither fully exists on its own, brand-wise -- that they are in fact a new mingled entity called Dreamamount. That's been my impression, at least. It's much simpler to just say "Dreamamount" than to sort it all out every single time you write about a movie that DreamWorks has developed and produced but Paramount is distributing, blah, blah.
"The best marriage is when the husband and wife are always open to compromise, and the most important thing is dialogue," Spielberg tells Holson. "I think this marriage is going to be dependent on a healthy amount of dialogue."
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on February 5, 2007 at 6:57 AM
comment #1
vansmith
says ...
Sumner will have the last word on this and it will be, "we own dreamworks steven.."
Posted by vansmith
at February 5, 2007 7:35 AM
comment #2
EDouglas
says ...
The new Shrek 3 trailer has a prominent "Distributed by Paramount Pictures" logo, not at the beginning but towards the end, although most of my former Paramount contacts have done more to promote and sell the DreamWorks films than ones they developed themselves. Case in point is the upcoming Disturbia, which had two-night previews with a great dinner afterwards... none of my former DreamWorks contacts were even there (they no longer work for the company). If it's really such a separate entity than why didn't DreamWorks keep its New York staff? You go to the Paramount offies/screening room and you're just as likely to see the DreamWorks movies postered all over the place than any of their own movies.
Posted by EDouglas
at February 5, 2007 7:49 AM
comment #3
donnyboy
says ...
Hey, Spielberg: keep your company financially solvent and you'll get to run it exactly he way you want to.
Posted by donnyboy
at February 5, 2007 7:52 AM
comment #4
AH
says ...
I think this is a way for Spielberg, and his group, to support Snider, she has made the company better, and to cut Grey down. Going out on a limb here by saying that it seems like Gray's days are numbered.
Posted by AH
at February 5, 2007 8:02 AM
comment #5
D.Z.
says ...
I don't see why Stevie would want to be credited for a string of uninspired comedies and b-movies, but that's his call.
Posted by D.Z.
at February 5, 2007 8:44 PM
comment #6
maria
says ...
Tom Cruise laughing out loud!
Posted by maria
at February 6, 2007 10:48 AM