It's sometimes unfair how certain stories or phrases or terms have a way of wrapping themselves around the neck of someone who's encountered press scrutiny. But fairly or not, newly hired Hollywood Reporter editor Elizabeth Guider is going to have to fend off the word "gizmos" -- a term that former colleague Tom Tapp says that she once used to describe "computers and Blackberrys" -- for some time to come.
I mean, my God, that's almost like calling them "contraptions" or "doohickeys"! Guider hasn't reportedly described persons conversant with the nuts and bolts of cyber journalism as "whippersnappers," but maybe Tapp was out of the room. It's hard not to regard anyone's use of the "g" word as a blade of grass that reflects on an entire universe of comprehensions as well as a regarding askance of the whole technological turnover that journalism is undergoing these days. Forward!
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on August 3, 2007 at 6:41 AM
comment #1
Zimmergirl
says ...
That was then. Women are fast learners. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Posted by Zimmergirl
at August 3, 2007 7:38 AM
comment #2
erniesouchak
says ...
I don't know. I'm not a moron about technology and I've occasionally used "gizmos" to refer to whole families of devices. It's a hell of a lot easier than trying to remember what all of them are called.
Posted by erniesouchak
at August 3, 2007 7:47 AM
comment #3
gruver1
says ...
Wells to zimmergirl: Be afraid of women because they're fast learners (what are you talking about?) or be afraid of Guider because she'll want to get back at Tom Tapp and myself for finding meaning in her use of that term? Wells to erniesouchak: so you're telling me certain terms DON'T connote yesteryear attitudes? You know that they do. It's obviously an eyebrow-raiser when a person like Guider, engaged front and center in a business that is changing over from ink and paper to digital 24 hour news cycles, conveys an attitude about new technologies that obviously indicates a lack of familiarity.
Posted by gruver1
at August 3, 2007 8:25 AM
comment #4
mutinyco
says ...
Maybe she's just a fan of Gremlins...
Posted by mutinyco
at August 3, 2007 8:29 AM
comment #5
Me
says ...
I tend to agree with erniesouchak on this one. I think there's a big distinction between "gizmos," which doesn't connote unfamiliarity in the same way as "contraptions" does. I could use gizmos with my friends to talk about iPods, blackberries, laptops, cell phones, etc. and they wouldn't think anything of it. It would just sound like I wasn't being very specific. If I used "contraptions" or "dohickeys," I'd get looks like I was way out of the loop.
Posted by Me
at August 3, 2007 8:37 AM
comment #6
drbob
says ...
Jeff is wrong. Gizmos is a perfectly acceptable term for all manner of electronic and digital devices. It has a sort of retro-hipster flair, and does not necessarily indicate technological incompetence.
Posted by drbob
at August 3, 2007 9:47 AM
comment #7
Joe Leydon
says ...
Well, I don't think it's quite fair to dis the lady for saying "gizmos" when she's referring to all those thingamabobs. I do it all the time. Well, except when I'm referring to one, specific gizmo. Then I say "dingus."
Posted by Joe Leydon
at August 3, 2007 9:48 AM
comment #8
Bocephus
says ...
I've been known to say "gizmos" and "dohickeys," as well as my favorite, "doomaflachie."
It's fun to use other words to describe objects. Try it some time! My friend used to call prostitutes "toots." Oh, how we laughed!
Besides, if we resign to using nothing but corporation-assigned words like "blackberry" and "iPod" aren't we simply succumbing to brand-name brainwashing?
Posted by Bocephus
at August 3, 2007 9:51 AM
comment #9
Gaydos
says ...
Sure I'm not objective since I'm a former colleague of Guider but you could also say I'm extremely well-informed: the woman knows more about more than you can imagine. Guider is one of the sharpest, best-informed (she knows there's a world outside Hollywood and America and spent many years working in London and Rome) and most sophisticated women in the town.
So what if she's casual and relaxed and flippant enough to call our sacred technologies "gizmos." Don't mistake flippancy for luddite tendencies. Quite the opposite in her case.
And I say this knowing full well she's gone to work "down the street," as we say!
Posted by Gaydos
at August 3, 2007 9:59 AM
comment #10
T. Holly
says ...
Great Gaydos, but my gizmo is still officially offended. Step one, include HR on-line with the cost of the print edition, like Variety does. Step two, go head to head with Screen International and open up that firewall.
Posted by T. Holly
at August 3, 2007 10:37 AM
comment #11
christian
says ...
gizmos is a perfectly acceptable word that you still hear in constant use across the media.
tho if your face and fingers aren't plugged constantly into these social-bore devices you're clearly not in the geek groove.
and what is your replacement word, jeff?
Posted by christian
at August 3, 2007 10:53 AM
comment #12
T. S. Idiot
says ...
A bigger annoyance is the thousands of people who name their fuzzy cats, dogs, hamsters, etc. Gizmo in honor of Gremlins. More imagination, people!
Posted by T. S. Idiot
at August 3, 2007 11:30 AM
comment #13
bmcintire
says ...
Crapnology
Posted by bmcintire
at August 3, 2007 11:32 AM
comment #14
Gaydos
says ...
I think Jeff is confusing "gizmo" with "thingamajig," which, incidentally, was Steve Jobs' original name for Apple.
Does anyone here remember when "plastic" was the evil word, not "gizmo?"
As the great poet, BobDylan/TwoPointOh said, "The times they are a-search-engine-optimizin'......"
Posted by Gaydos
at August 3, 2007 11:52 AM
comment #15
tommysunshine
says ...
I first met Tom Tapp at Cannes 2004. Even then I had a hard time taking him seriously and he was too earnest to pass off as satire.
Here he is dissing a former colleague who has just got a job he went for and didn't get. Apparently she uses the word 'gizmo'. Woodward and Bernstein can sleep easy tonight.
Posted by tommysunshine
at August 3, 2007 9:17 PM
comment #16
T. Holly
says ...
Wow.
Posted by T. Holly
at August 3, 2007 10:17 PM