July 2
July 3
July 4
Diminished Capacity
Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson
We are Together
July 9
July 11
August
Eight Miles High
Journey to the Center of the Earth
Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
July 18
A Very British Gangster
Before I Forget
Felon
Lou Reed's Berlin
Transsiberian
July 22
July 23
A major disagreement is shaping up over The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (Warner Bros., 9.21), and it'll break wide open next Tuesday morning (9.4), which is when the trades and certain web columnists will be running their reviews. (Me included.) I'm a friend of this film -- a big one. Two journalists I've spoken to this morning (one of them being CHUD's Devin Faraci) feel the same way. But I've also heard that a certain guy hates it. This strikes me as somewhere between deranged and blasphemous by the standards of the Church of the Good Movie Lover. (A friend who attended last Tuesday night's screening says this guy seemed to be in a state of discomfort as Jesse James unspooled, looking around every so often and eyeballing other viewers as if to say "you're actually absorbed in this thing?") Father, forgive anyone who trashes this film without reservation or qualification. Because I won't.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on August 30, 2007 at 01:22 PM
Posted by actionman
at August 30, 2007 02:37 PM
Posted by PerfectTommy
at August 30, 2007 02:42 PM
Posted by Rothchild
at August 30, 2007 02:44 PM
Posted by Mike Schaefer
at August 30, 2007 02:46 PM
Posted by alynch
at August 30, 2007 02:47 PM
Posted by Ishmael
at August 30, 2007 02:47 PM
Posted by gruver1
at August 30, 2007 02:52 PM
comment #8
says ...moralmovies.blogspot.com - Now that is truly worthwhile. As a Christian with a sense of humor -- which probably puts me right up there with overweight Hispanics on this website -- this is brilliant. Dismiss it all!
Jesse James looks great...I'm wondering which pauper thinks the emperor has no clothes...
Posted by J. Huff
at August 30, 2007 02:54 PM
comment #9
says ...Saw it last night with Jeff. It was very good. Not great. Certainly not a masterpiece. Looked gorgeous. I'd dare say Deakins wins an Oscar for his cinematography. Pitt was very good, Casey was great, but I don't see a nomination for either of them unless WB can get the Academy to buy Casey as a supporting actor, even though it's very much his movie. Thing's too long. No other way around it. Needed a good 15-20 mins shaved. Score is fantastic, no surprise since it was Nick Cave. Drags a bit in the middle. And I'd also venture to say that this is not a western. It's set in the West but thematically it's very different than most Westerns. I'll review it in the next couple weeks, got lots else to get to...
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 02:54 PM
Posted by Rothchild
at August 30, 2007 02:59 PM
Posted by jeffmcm
at August 30, 2007 03:05 PM
comment #12
says ...It could only be either Poland, or maybe Roger Ebert. Nobody else would matter.
Gotta be Poland if it's one of those two. Ebert's review won't show up until the movie opens, so he'd have no role in a fight breaking out next Tuesday.
Posted by Brian
at August 30, 2007 03:15 PM
Posted by Devin Faraci
at August 30, 2007 03:23 PM
comment #14
says ...Jesus what, Devin. The movie was very good. Maybe it was great. But it was no masterpiece, come on... you can't ignore the fact that it dragged a bit in the middle (when Casey is offscreen for a period long enough for me to have noticed it and write it down in my notes) I thought most of it really worked but there was some unnecessary drama in there with the Jim Cummings stuff... they played it up like Paul Schneider would be a major character and then he gets lost in the second half, so the stuff I'd cut out, Rothchild, besides a few seconds here and there to tighten it up, would've been some of the comedic moments at the beginning- all well written but I feel like the story drifted a little away from Casey and over to the Dick Liddel and Wood characters... I just don't see it as a Best Picture nominee. It didn't have that one scene that made me sit up and go WOW! Elah, despite its problems, had that scene. Casey Affleck was pretty damn good though. He really changes throughout the movie, as a character should when they have 2 hrs and 45 mins to develop...
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 03:34 PM
comment #15
says ...Stop pimping yourself, MiraJeffAICN. It's tacky. If you have something to say, the say it, but keep the self-promotional stuff to yourself. I don't come to this site so that I can find out what's going on with your career. I come to this site to make stupid fucking comments, read what JEFF has to say, and read what other people have to say vis a vis what Jeff writes and what other people write in the comments section. Hasn't that facile, remedial sit you write for gotten enough attention already?
Posted by MilkMan
at August 30, 2007 03:39 PM
Posted by Noah
at August 30, 2007 03:40 PM
Posted by MilkMan
at August 30, 2007 03:41 PM
Posted by jeffmcm
at August 30, 2007 03:42 PM
comment #19
says ...Okay, MiraJeff. You're right. It's not a masterpiece because you wrote:
"Casey Affleck not in movie right now confused"
in your notes? And no "wow" scenes? I'll try not to spoil anything. In no particular order:
1) The opening train scene
2) _______'s death
3) _______'s death
4) _______'s death
5) _______'s death
6) The "crying into the saddle" scene
7) The stars
8) The opening ten minutes
9) The midnight confession
10) The snake
Actually, I could do that all day. I'll just say it's a "wow movie."
Posted by Rothchild
at August 30, 2007 03:48 PM
Posted by jimjonesiii
at August 30, 2007 03:51 PM
Posted by Geoff
at August 30, 2007 03:53 PM
Posted by abraham
at August 30, 2007 03:57 PM
Posted by abraham
at August 30, 2007 03:57 PM
Posted by T. Holly
at August 30, 2007 04:01 PM
comment #25
says ...Damn. MirraJeff dares say why he didn't think it was a masterpiece (but still said it was great), only after being asked to elaborate, and the knives come out.
Must evey movie be reduced to "masterpiece" or "poece of shit?"
he's the one from AICN, and ya'll are acting like a bunch of "talkbackers".
Posted by storymark
at August 30, 2007 04:04 PM
Posted by actionman
at August 30, 2007 04:04 PM
comment #27
says ...Milkman, what the hell are you talking about? Pimping myself? Because I posted my thoughts on the film and said if you want to read more, check AICN in a couple weeks? I suppose that's some form of self-promotion but you've surely gotta be kidding me, right? Is this not a forum to discuss movies? If you don't want to read what else I have to say about the movie, or understand what I've already written in the context of the film, then don't read my full review on AICN. And yes, Noah, a movie needs to WOW me to be considered great. There were a bunch of good scenes, especially the train robbery and the opening and closing 10 minutes, but there was nothing that really got to me on an emotional level. It's a cold film. Dominik tries to inject some emotion at the end with Mary-Louise Parker but because she's barely in the movie up until that point, I wasn't completely sold on it. Rothchild, masterpiece is a word I reserve for actual masterpieces, not Brad Pitt movies (as much as I like the guy), and MilkMan, you're just an idiot whose comments are completely unfounded and unwarranted. Next time you offer up an opinion I'll be sure to tell you to stop promoting yourself you solipsistic nit, whatever the hell that means. Are you British by any chance, because no self-respecting heterosexual American male would ever call another dude that. Yikes, you guys are embarassing yourself over a very good movie that one guy (me) just didn't think was that great. Relax. Everyone's so quick to start name-calling on these boards. You don't see Ebert and Roeper calling each other "nits" when they disagree, do you? I bet MilkMan hasn't even seen the movie...
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 04:04 PM
comment #28
says ...And Abraham, so now awards equals relevancy? So I guess the next time I offer up Crash's Best Picture as proof that THAT is a masterpiece, it will be the end of the discussion in your mind? And Actionman, you make a VERY good point. People are so quick to say 'masterpiece' or 'shit'. A film can achieve varying degrees of success. If you stripped away all the fat from Jesse James, it would probably be a masterpiece. At it's heart, the film is about jealousy, betrayal, the desire to be remembered, and one man's fascination with another man. I just felt like there were some additional sequences that were unnecessary because they didn't move the story of Ford forward. Like I said, pacing issues and a little bit too much Paul Schneider and Jeremy Renner are my only gripes with the film. You say one bad word about Jesse James and his cinephile posse jumps all over you. Yeesh.
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 04:12 PM
comment #29
says ...See, it's all about you, MiraJeff. "I'll review it in the next couple of weeks..." Who cares? And yes, I do happen to have been born and raised in Cornwall, where the word solipsistic isn't met with your type of righteous ignorance. Get this: I don't want to read your "full review" on AICN, and more importantly, I don't want to be reminded that you do write for AICN. That's the point. I'd like to read Jeff's full review, which is why I come here. And I could care less whether or not you didn't think the movie was that great. You may be right. What I care about is you coming on someone else's sight and pointing everyone in your direction. And the next time I promote myself will be the first, because I have nothing to promote. I'm a garden-variety working class slob. By the way, since you don't know what a nit is, I have to ask: Do you know what a twat is?
Posted by MilkMan
at August 30, 2007 04:14 PM
Posted by jeffmcm
at August 30, 2007 04:23 PM
Posted by MilkMan
at August 30, 2007 04:26 PM
Posted by T. Holly
at August 30, 2007 04:29 PM
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 04:29 PM
Posted by actionman
at August 30, 2007 04:38 PM
Posted by actionman
at August 30, 2007 04:39 PM
Posted by MilkMan
at August 30, 2007 04:39 PM
comment #37
says ...I am a complete actionman, I meant MiraJeff was most rational, but should save his thunder. You can't be a... you know the rest.
Sorry MilkMan, I still think about you spraying your shorts, but I can't always be on your side. I think I'm supposed to respond to the Wall Street/Godfather post above. Anyone have any ideas?
Posted by T. Holly
at August 30, 2007 04:54 PM
comment #38
says ...No on would jump on you, Mirajeff, if you quit posting. Easy solution, everybody wins.
I WAS looking forward to this. I thought Chopper was great, I like offbeat westerns like The Proposition, and the involvement of Mr. Cave is a plus. But it sounds slow and confusing and lacking in giant robot action, so now I'm not so sure.
Posted by frankbooth
at August 30, 2007 04:56 PM
Posted by wayne76
at August 30, 2007 05:04 PM
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 05:10 PM
comment #41
says ...Funny thing here is that MiraJeff was subtlely self-promoting, and then, when he's called on it (maybe too enthusiastically by MilkMan, but whatever), proceeds to namedrop AICN twice in his next post, as if to say "here's how you self-promote, buddy!"
Here's the text:
"Because I posted my thoughts on the film and said if you want to read more, check AICN in a couple weeks? I suppose that's some form of self-promotion but you've surely gotta be kidding me, right? Is this not a forum to discuss movies? If you don't want to read what else I have to say about the movie, or understand what I've already written in the context of the film, then don't read my full review on AICN. "
I love the redundancy of repeating that your full review will be on AICN, in case we didn't get that from earlier in that post, your previous posts, MIlkMan's previous posts, or your FUCKING USER NAME.
For the record, you never see Tapley doing that either here or on The Hot Blog.
Posted by lazarus
at August 30, 2007 05:45 PM
Posted by christian
at August 30, 2007 05:56 PM
Posted by Jay T.
at August 30, 2007 06:01 PM
Posted by DarthCorleone
at August 30, 2007 06:01 PM
Posted by Nick A.
at August 30, 2007 06:11 PM
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 06:22 PM
Posted by christian
at August 30, 2007 06:32 PM
comment #48
says ...Is that how they punish you over at Harry's house?
Judging from what you've said about other films in the past, your taste is pretty suspect, and I imagine there are others who have noticed this.
Forgive me if I forgo your full review and check out Jesse James without your cautionary words.
Posted by lazarus
at August 30, 2007 06:37 PM
comment #49
says ..."Wells to Ishmael: I'll try this one final time. If there's an emotional susceptibility or some kind of detectable vested interest on the part of a critic, you can't trust the review 100%."
So, by Jeffrey's own admission, all of his reviews are suspect.
P.S. I'm blowing MiraJeff tonight in a bathroom. You can read my review of it on this site tomorrow. It's only a blow job, so there won't be some kind of detectable vested interest on the part of this critic.
Posted by Aunt Sassy
at August 30, 2007 06:51 PM
comment #50
says ...Here's the thing: I think that saying 'You could make it shorter' is the worst, laziest criticism of this movie possible. Yes, I could EASILY go through and shave thirty minutes off this movie while retaining the narrative, but I would kill the movie. This is a film that lives in long takes and languid pacing. Casey Affleck does amazing work in thee long shots that linger on his face, and while you could trim those, you'd lose the magic that Dominik has accomplished.
Yes, movies can be too long, but they can also be too short. This is a film that needs room to breathe, and it's paced perfectly for that. Is it a masterpiece? I don't know - it's too easy to throw a word like that around and regret it in a couple of years, but it is a serious accomplishment. It's a film that, if not actually capital G Great, is certainly in the same zip code.
Posted by Devin Faraci
at August 30, 2007 07:51 PM
comment #51
says ...Devin, I totally understand what you're saying. Eastern Promises for example, was too short. And I loved some of the lingering close-ups of Casey. I loved how drenched in mood and atmosphere the film was. I wasn't suggesting that the problem with the film is that Dominik doesn't know when to cut and move on. There is magic up on that screen. What I was trying to say is that parts of the story seem shoehorned in, or just aren't all that necessary to begin with, particularly the early focus on Dick Liddel, Renner's Wood character and the Jim Cummings talk. Believe me, I know it's lazy to say too long, too short, too whatever. But there's no way you can tell me this movie is the perfect length, because it isn't. It wouldn't kill the film if it was 10 minutes shorter. I bet you wouldn't even notice what went missing. If you could EASILY shave off 30 mins, then would it really kill you to cut 10 mins, and yes, those 10 mins DO make a difference because once the audience starts getting restless you've lost them. Now the movie didn't lose me, but I have more patience than the average filmgoer. A movie's running time doesn't scare me off, personally, but it is a major detriment to others, especially folks older than you and I, the same group of folks this movie is targeting, the folks who grew up with Westerns and played Cowboys and Indians and who actually know who Jesse James is. I don't think I could get my parents into a nearly 3 hour movie, and my mother is the biggest Brad Pitt fan alive. Again, the length didn't kill it for me, it doesn't take away from the accomplishments of the film, but it certainly impacts the theatrical experience as a whole when you're sitting there 80 minutes in realizing you're only at the halfway point in the film.
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 30, 2007 08:04 PM
comment #52
says ...Wow, ok. I'm late to the party. Saying this has grown repetitive since the cart-wheeling test screening reviews from months ago now and that's that I love everything I know thus far about this film and everything that I've heard thus far about this film. Jeff Wells and Devin Faraci like it, that's great to hear but I'm ready as-hell to watch this thing.
Posted by source188
at August 30, 2007 08:38 PM
Posted by lazespud
at August 30, 2007 08:38 PM
comment #54
says ...can't wait for this movie. mirajeff, I don't think you meant any malice by it, and it's not that big a deal, but I can definitely see where people are coming from about pointing them elsewhere/promotion. Like the Old West, if you want to talk here, just say what ya gotta say, no one really needs to know what you're going to say in a week. but, do keep talking here, because I am interested in your opinion, and you help make quality threads!
As for Devin, don't get cocky or nothin, but keep up the work, you and Wells are the two online critics i generally trust, now get back to work!
Posted by Mr B
at August 30, 2007 09:08 PM
comment #55
says ...MiraJeff, I understand where you're coming from and I won't criticize your opinion of the film since I haven't seen it. However, I completely disagree when you say that older people are less inclined to watch longer movies. I think it's the exact opposite. The younger people are the ones who are always getting nervous about long running lengths.
Posted by alynch
at August 30, 2007 11:09 PM
Posted by christian
at August 30, 2007 11:41 PM
comment #57
says ...I guess it goes both ways, ALynch. Way too many kids my age don't have the patience to watch a 3-hour film, or a subtitled film for that matter, which is truly a shame. But I don't expect to see too many 50+ folks standing in line for a 2 hr 45 min film that screens anytime after 7pm.
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at August 31, 2007 05:06 AM
comment #58
says ...Milkman - you're being a prick. End o' story.
What is it with the catty bitchiness of these boards?
Good lord, let people have their own opinions and stop thinking your views are somehow more important or valid than they are - important mainly to YOU. THESE ARE JUST MOVIES. Go outside, do something.
Posted by Geo B
at August 31, 2007 07:52 AM
Posted by T. Holly
at August 31, 2007 08:40 AM
comment #60
says ...Here's the HOLLYWOOD REPORTER's Kirk Honeycutt on the picture, calling it a long, pretentious yawn with mumbling, incomprehensible dialects.
At the heart of "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" lies an obsessive, destructive relationship between two disparate yet oddly similar men. One will eventually kill the other. Yet this fascinating relationship gets smothered in pointlessly long takes, repetitive scenes, grim Western landscapes and mumbled, heavily accented dialogue.
The self-indulgence begins with director Andrew Dominik and infects much of the cast, who deliver meandering, unstable performances. Instead of contemplating the moral dimensions of novelist Ron Hansen's portrait of outlaw paranoia and obsession, a viewer can only think of waste -- the waste of good material and themes, a talented cast and, most crucially, the viewer's own time.
Coming from the production companies of the film's star, Brad Pitt, and Ridley and Tony Scott and based on Hansen's well received novel, the film's pedigree probably means a solid opening week, However, word of mouth may kill the movie faster than Robert Ford killed Jesse James.
For the record, Ford, played by Casey Affleck, doesn't shoot Pitt's James until 132 minutes into the 160-minute running time. Strangely, what happens afterwards is at least as interesting as what leads up to the murder. So the film also suffers from an imbalance: Too much time is lavished on the inevitable and not enough on its aftermath.
In 1881, Jesse James, age 34, is at the height of his fame as an outlaw. Bob Ford, 19, is the restless country rube and younger brother of one of James gang. He has read every nickle novel written about the infamous gang and is drawn to the scary, charismatic Jesse, who heads the gang along with his older brother Frank (Sam Shepard, who's barely in the film despite being third billed).
Most gang members are wary if not frightened of the moody Jesse and his explosive, often murderous temper, but Robert is irresistably drawn to him. It's never clear to either man whether Robert wants to be like Jesse or destroy Jesse or, somehow, become him. The film is nothing if not a meditation on a fan's obsession with a celebrity, a phenomenon now called stalking.
But Dominik, who also wrote the script, drags out this poisonous courtship with protracted scenes either virtually empty of significance or redundant. Clouds roll swiftly over western skies. The weeds flap in the breeze. Men grunt and spit and stare at one another in mockery or fear.
Then there are those accents. Whether they accurately reflect the country rube-cracker speech of 19th century Missouri or not, they frequently land on 21st century ears as unintelligible sounds. Couldn't this have been cleaned up on the ADR stage?
The film grimly -- but no doubt accurately -- portrays one of the most famous outlaw gangs in history as a collection of hicks, petty thieves and psychopathic murderers. Pitt's Jesse is a born killer who sometimes covers up his brutality with nasty humor and bursts of generosity. He's naturally paranoid and shoots anyone he suspects, whether he has reason to or not. If Robert didn't kill Jesse, Jesse surely would have killed him and his brother Charley (Sam Rockwell).
Affleck's Robert is the most interesting character here. Affleck does something to his voice that makes him whiny. He talks in a whimper, and his body moves in odd, halting angles. He is handsome but doesn't seem to know it. He alternately exudes great enthusiasm or sulks. He is a man forever auditioning for a role but uncertain exactly what it is. Then he finds his role -- and learns to hate himself and the act that made him famous.
Charley is a lackey, but after the killing turns morose, hateful and suicidal as the two tour the country in a stage show where they re-enact the killing, with Charley playing Jesse. Meanwhile, two gang members, played by Paul Schneider and Jeremy Reener, carry on a feud that proves lethal for both. The women in the lives of these men, Mary-Louise Parker as Jesse's wife and Zooey Deschanel as a sympathetic friend acquired during his "stage career," are barely glimpsed.
Missouri circa 1880 in this Canadian-shot production is a raw, untamed land of rough beauty and mean accommodations. One thing of note is Nick Cave and Warren Ellis' music. They have produced a languid, often mournful score that is almost a durge. Cave, the Australian singer-songwriter, also appears in a saloon scene to sing a well-known song from that era about Jesse and Robert.
Posted by Ian Sinclair
at August 31, 2007 12:17 PM
comment #61
says ...Bored people are boring. If static shots and silence and still faces and bodies in repose make you uncomfortable then it's probably because they make you self-conscious, gently suggest that you become an active participant in the story, which is what a large portion of moviegoers - professional "reviewers" included - are loathe to do, seeing as how going to the movies has become an excuse for people to satiate their buffet gene and acquire masturbatory images for use at a later place and time. So far the complaints leveled against this movie sound exactly like something I would hear from a high school student. "It's too slow." "I was bored." "They talked funny." I'm sure this movie has many faults, but I haven't read an intelligent rendering of them yet. I guess I'll have to wait for MiraJeffAICN to chime in. Only a few more days until his hotly anticpated review goes up underneath a link to behind-the-scenes photos from the making of Iron Man. I, for one, am waiting with baited breath.
Posted by MilkMan
at August 31, 2007 03:56 PM
Posted by Ian Sinclair
at August 31, 2007 04:02 PM
comment #63
says ...Sir, if you need to resort to proofreading to think you've proven a point, then by all means, go ahead. That extra "i" really sends the whole house of cards tumbling down. Your level of discourse is as childish as your take on the movie.
By the way, you forgot to hit the return button between the sentences "killed Jesse James." and "For the record." In the future, if I were you, make sure you proofread your own before pointing out the mistakes in others.
Posted by MilkMan
at August 31, 2007 04:29 PM
Posted by BurmaShave
at August 31, 2007 05:51 PM
Posted by BurmaShave
at August 31, 2007 05:54 PM
Posted by christian
at August 31, 2007 06:44 PM
comment #67
says ...Fuck you, B.S. I'm kind of [sick] of people who don't realize that quoting Rodney King stopped being funny like back in 1999? It's now the detris of sitcoms and Jamie Kennedy dreck.
Actually, I'm just fucking with. A lot of posters round here seriously do seem to be on the rag this week, though. Like a 3-Midol adult-sized bangeroo.
Posted by MickTravis
at August 31, 2007 06:45 PM
Posted by MickTravis
at August 31, 2007 06:48 PM
Posted by Ponderer
at September 1, 2007 01:01 PM
comment #70
says ...Honeycut's review clearly says 'accents', not 'dialects'. If you want to be really pedantic, you should have said 'abated breath' since 'to bate' is archaic English.
So Poland's review is out. Let it be said, for all Jeff Wells' flaws as a person, that he usually has better taste in movies than Poland.
Posted by jeffmcm
at September 1, 2007 01:19 PM
comment #71
says ...og+couple+sexe">blog+couple+sexe
alexia+blog+sexe
sexe+amateur+blog
blog+gay+sexe
blog+photo+sexe+amateur+bretagne
sexe+gratuit+blog
blog+sexe+photo+amateur
blog+sexe+venal
amateur+sexe+blog
blog+pipe+sexe
blog+porno+sexe+gratuit
blog+tres+sexe
blog+sexe+vieille
liste+blog+sexe
prive+blog+sexe+hard+porno
blog+sexe+amateur+gratuit
blog+sexe+webcam
blog+video+femme+sexe
blog+voyeur+sexe+amateur
sexe+over+blog
blog+amateur+sexe+porno
blog+libertin+sexe
photo+sexe+blog
blog+couple+perso+sexe
blog+porno+x+amateur+sexe
blog+sexe+beurette
blog+voyeur+amateur+sexe
webcam+video+sexe+blog
blog+gratuit+sexe
blog+rencontre+sexe
blog+string+sexe
copine+blog+photo+sexe
blog+amateur+sexe+gratuit
blog+and+and+sexe
blog+histoire+sexe
blog+sexe+string
blog+sexe+voyeur
blog+webcam+sexe
sky+blog+sexe
blog+j+m+sexe
blog+sexe+etudiante
blog+sexe+mans+femme
blog+sexe+porno+amateur
hot+blog+sexe
sexe+and+blog
webcam+blog+sexe
blog+adulte+sexe+avec+real+player
blog+annuaire+sexe
blog+sexe+homo
blog+video+sexe+amateur
amatrice+blog+sexe
annuaire+blog+amateur+sexe
blog+clip+sexe
blog+image+sexe
blog+perso+hard+sexe
blog+sexe+femme+mure
blog+sexe+video+amateur
sexe+hard+blog
blog+perso+sexe+cul
blog+sexe+amateur+video
blog+sexe+black
sexe+photo+gratuit
sexe+gratuit+photo
photo+sexe+amateur+gratuit
galerie+photo+sexe+gratuit
photo+de+sexe+de+femme+gratuit
photo+gratuit+sexe
photo+and+sexe+and+gratuit
photo+sexe+gay+gratuit
photo+gratuite+sexe+gratuit
gratuit+photo+sexe
annuaire+photo+sexe+gratuit
video+et+photo+sexe+gratuit
photo+amateur+sexe+gratuit
photo+gay+gratuit+sexe
photo+sexe+gratuit+cul+gratuit
photo+sexe+hard+gratuit
photo+sexe+zoophile+amateur+gratuit
photo+video+sexe+gratuit
sexe+photo+amateur+gratuit
gratuit+sexe+photo
photo+sexe+gratuit+amateur
sexe+and+photo+and+gratuit
photo+et+video+sexe+gratuit
photo+gratuit+galerie+tgp+sexe
sexe+gratuit+photo+video
photo+sexe+crade+gratuit
sexe+amateur+photo+gratuit
sexe+photo+penetration+gratuit
gay+sexe+photo+gratuit
blog+photo+sexe+gratuit
photo+gay+sexe+gratuit
photo+sexe+gratuit+des+femme+mure
photo+enceinte+sexe+gratuit
photo+sexe+black+gratuit
photo+de+sexe+mature+gratuit
sexe+photo+video+gratuit
video+est+photo+sexe+gratuit
photo+and+de+and+sexe+and+gratuit
photo+femme+sexe+gratuit
photo+porno+video+porno+gratuit+sexe+sexy+porno+cul+marie+jalouse+elle+match+pantouze+charme+webcam+hard
sexe+and+amateur+and+gratuit+and+photo+and+video
amateur+de+photo+sexe+gratuit
photo+sexe+denise+gratuit
sexe+amateur+gratuit+photo+video
sexe+and+gratuit+and+photo
sexe+photo+brune+gratuit
sexe+amateur+gratuit+photo
ici+photo+sexe+gratuit
photo+gratuit+de+sexe+amateur
photo+hard+sexe+gratuit
photo+jeune+sexe+gratuit
x+gratuit+photo+sexe
photo+sexe+anal+gratuit
sexe+amateur+photo+extraordinaire+gratuit
photo+sexe+asiatique+gratuit
des+photo+du+sexe+bizarre+gratuit
photo+sexe+gratuit+photo+jour
photo+sexe+porno+gratuit
photo+sexe+arabe+gratuit
sexe+gratuit+photo+amateur
video+and+photo+and+sexe+and+amateur+and+gratuit
video+photo+sexe+amateur+gratuit
galerie+photo+gratuit+sexe
photo+sexe+homme+gratuit
sexe+gratuit+video+photo
sexe+hard+photo+gratuit
femme+sexe+photo+gratuit
ici+photo+gratuit+sexe
photo+amateur+gratuit+sexe
photo+porno+sexe+gay+gratuit
photo+video+amatrice+sexe+gratuit
photo+and+sexe+and+amateur+and+gratuit
photo+charme+sexe+gratuit
photo+porno+sexe+gratuit
photo+sexe+extreme+gratuit
sexe+hard+gratuit+photo
photo+cul+sexe+gratuit
photo+galerie+sexe+gratuit
photo+sexe+de+femme+enceinte+gratuit
sexe+femme+poilue+photo+gratuit
sexe+vraiment+gratuit+photo
photo+sexe+gratuit+galerie
photo+sexe+gratuit+gay
photo+sexe+nu+gratuit
photo+sexe+poilu+gratuit
photo+sexe+salope+berettes+gratuit
rencontre+sexe+gratuit+avec+photo
sexe+femme+poilue+photo+gratuit+france
sexe+gratuit+photo+brune
photo+and+video+and+sexe+and+amateur+and+gratuit
photo+sexe+amateur+zoophile+gratuit
photo+sexe+gratuit+baise
photo+sexe+gratuit+gay+beur
photo+video+sexe+amateur+gratuit
sexe+gratuit+avec+photo
annuaire+sexe+gratuit+photo
gay+sexe+photo+beur+gratuit
photo+d+un+sexe+feminin+gratuit
photo+sexe+totalement+gratuit
femme+sexe
sexe+femme+mure
sexe+grosse+femme
photo+sexe+femme
sexe+femme+mature
sexe+femme+enceinte
femme+mure+sexe
femme+et+sexe
photo+sexe+femme+gratuit
sexe+femme+nu
sexe+vieille+femme
sexe+femme+gratuit
femme+sexe+lesbienne
femme+enceinte+sexe
sexe+femme+noire
sexe+entre+femme
femme+nu+sexe
sexe+femme+poilue
grosse+femme+sexe
femme+mature+sexe
rencontre+femme+sexe
sexe+femme+photo
photo+femme+sexe
femme+manque+sexe
femme+noire+sexe
sexe+vieille+femme+gratuit
femme+ronde+sexe
sexe+gratuit+vieille+femme
vieille+femme+sexe
sexe+femme+poilu
sexe+jeune+femme
femme+sexe+gratuit
sexe+et+femme
photo+sexe+femme+nu
photo+sexe+femme+mure
sexe+femme+grosse
sexe+gratuit+femme+mure
sexe+femme+black
sexe+gratuit+femme
femme+exhibitionniste+libertin+aimant+sexe
sexe+femme+mure+gratuit
blog+femme+sexe
femme+aimant+sexe
sexe+femme+agee
sexe+femme+porno
sexe+avec+femme+mure
sexe+femme+arabe
jeune+femme+sexe
sexe+homme+et+femme
photo+sexe+vieille+femme
sexe+tres+vieille+femme
sexe+femme+africaine
femme+sexe+video
gros+sexe+femme
femme+qui+aime+sexe
sexe+and+femme
sexe+femme+fontaine
sexe+femme+mature+gratuit
sexe+and+and+femme
photo+sexe+femme+mature
sexe+homme+femme
video+sexe+femme
sexe+femme+et+homme
femme+sexe+poilu
sexe+femme+homme
femme+chaude+sexe
femme+cherche+sexe
image+sexe+femme
sexe+femme+forte
grosse+femme+et+sexe
sexe+femme+noir
sexe+gratuit+femme+mature
femme+arabe+sexe
femme+libertin+exhibitionniste+aimant+sexe
video+sexe+femme+mure
exhibition+femme+sexe+nord+france
femme+fontaine+sexe
femme+nu+et+sexe
belle+femme+sexe
femme+echangiste+aimant+sexe
sexe+femme+ronde
femme+and+sexe
femme+mure+sexe+gratuit
sexe+femme+naine
femme+sexe+nu
photo+sexe+femme+gratuite
sexe+femme+rase
femme+amatrice+sexe
femme+mariee+arabe+sexe
femme+black+sexe
rencontre+femme+mature+sexe+rhone+alpes
sexe+femme+mur
sexe+femme+obese
femme+echangiste+libertin+aimant+sexe
femme+mure+sexe+xxx+gratuit
femme+sexe+poilue
photo+gratuite+sexe+femme
sexe+lingerie+femme
sexe+photo+femme
sexe+histoire
histoire+de+sexe+gratuit
histoire+de+sexe+gratuite
histoire+and+de+and+sexe
histoire+sexe+zoophile
histoire+sexe+gay
histoire+and+sexe
histoire+sexe+ado
histoire+sexe+hard
annuaire+histoire+de+sexe
histoire+de+sexe+net
hds+histoire+de+sexe
histoire+sexe+amateur
histoire+sexe+cocu
histoire+de+sexe+chaude
sexe+gratuit+histoire
histoire+sexe+avec+bete
histoire+erotique+sexe
histoire+gay+sexe
histoire+sexe+epile
histoire+gratuite+sexe
histoire+de+sexe+.net
histoire+sexe+erotique
histoire+sexe+en+famille
histoire+vraie+de+sexe
histoire+delire+sexe
histoire+coquin+sexe
histoire+erotique+sexe+gay
histoire+rasage+sexe
sexe+bi+histoire
histoire+hot+de+sexe
histoire+sexe+scatologique
histoire+amateur+de+sexe
histoire+de+sexe+vecues
blog+histoire+sexe
hds+histoire+sexe+lesbien
histoire+drole+de+sexe
histoire+erotique+porno+sexe
histoire+de+sexe+free
histoire+sexe+illustree
histoire+sexe+sm+soumise
recit+histoire+de+sexe
collant+perso+histoire+sexe
histoire+coquin+sexe+confession+recits
histoire+hard+cul+sexe
histoire+piercing+sexe+levres
histoire+sexe+entre+jeune+gay
histoire+sm+sexe
newsletter+sexe+histoire
sexe+histoire+gay
histoire+and+piercing+and+sexe+and+levres
histoire+de+sexe+au+bureau
newsletter+and+sexe+and+histoire
transforme+femme+sexe+histoire
confession+histoire+sexe+sm
histoire+ado+sexe
histoire+de+femme+sexe
histoire+sexe+epiles
histoire+sexe+porno
sexe+amateur+histoire
sexe+histoire+gratuit
gay+sexe+histoire
histoire+chaude+de+sexe
histoire+de+sexe+cochon
histoire+de+sexe+pour+femme
histoire+sexe+illustre+gratuite
histoire+sexe+scato
histoire+sims+sexe
page+perso+histoire+sexe
histoire+sexe+cul
recit+et+histoire+erotique+sexe+gay
femme+histoire+sexe
forum+histoire+torture+sexe+sadique+gore
histoire+and+sexe+and+gratuit
histoire+gratuite+sexe+sans+tabou
histoire+hard+sexe
petite+histoire+de+sexe
ado+sexe+histoire
blog+sur+histoire+sexe
charme+sexe+histoire+erotique+gratuite
histoire+erotique+sexe+porono
histoire+et+recit+erotique+sexe+gay
histoire+intime+sexe
histoire+petit+sexe
histoire+vacances+sexe
sexe+and+histoire
sexe+gay+histoire
sexe+histoire+famille
ado+histoire+sexe
confession+histoire+sexe
gratuit+sexe+histoire
histoire+erotique+sexe+groupe
histoire+erotique+sexe+intime
histoire+illustree+de+sexe
histoire+promenade+nu+sexe+epile
histoire+sexe+avec+fermiere
histoire+sexe+entre+homme
histoire+sexe+extreme
histoire+sexe+homme+nu
video+gratuite+sexe
sexe+video+gratuite
extrait+video+sexe+gratuite
video+and+sexe+and+gratuite
extrait+video+gratuite+sexe
video+sexe+amateur+gratuite
sexe+entre+race+video+gratuite+diaporama
video+sexe+gratuite+a+telecharger
video+gratuite+sexe+amateur
video+and+gratuite+and+sexe
video+and+de+and+sexe+and+gratuite
video+sexe+gratuite+extrait
video+sexe+porno+gratuite
video+gratuite+sexe+gogo
longue+video+sexe+gratuite
voir+des+video+gratuite+de+sexe
sexe+video+gratuite+de+lesbienne
video+sexe+gratuite+amateur
petite+video+sexe+gratuite
video+gratuite+amateur+sexe
video+sexe+totalement+gratuite
telecharger+video+sexe+gratuite
grosse+video+sexe+gratuite
video+amateur+sexe+gratuite
video+sexe+gratuite+yasmine
demo+de+video+de+sexe+gratuite
sexe+video+amateur+gratuite
video+gratuite+sexe+extrait
video+gratuite+sexe+suceuse
video+sexe+gratuite+vieille
video+sexe+entierement+gratuite
sexe+amateur+video+gratuite
telechargement+de+video+de+sexe+gratuite
video+et+photo+sexe+gratuite