Control's Sam Riley having won the Chicago Film Festival's Silver Hugo Best Actor award tells us three things. One, there are others besides myself who believe Riley's performance as Ian Curtis is not just phenomenal but award- worthy. Two, Chicago Film Festival voters are clearly too eccentric to influence industry thinking about '07's Best Actor finalists. And three, this "Chicago flake" factor will allow the Gurus of Gold and Envelope prognosticators to continue saying, "It's very nice that you admire Sam Riley's acting, Jeff, but c'mon, get real...we're talking likely winners here."

If a performance like Riley's is imbued with that special something (which it obviously is), nothing else should matter. Certainly not at this stage of the game. The only reason people are saying "Riley's too new" or "he's not a serious contender" is because the Weinstein Co. is seen as a precarious player these days and particularly because they're not spending big money to support Control and its makers.
Being new to the business doesn't matter if there's money behind you. Did people say 45 years ago, "Forget Peter O'Toole as a Best Actor contender for his Lawrence of Arabia performance...he's too young and too unknown"? No, and the reason they didn't is because Columbia Pictures was behind the Oscar campaign big-time, and so the industry sat up and showed obeisance before power and nominated O'Toole. It was that simple, and it's this simple here and now. Sam Riley is, in a manner of speaking, the wet-behind-the-ears Peter O'Toole of 2007. He just doesn't have big-studio pockets backing him up. That's the only real difference.
On top of which is my old saw about there being plenty of time to play the status-quo Oscar prediction game after Thanksgiving. Now is the time for prognosticators to stand up for people who deserve the awards-consideration attention. Right now, I say to hell with the Academy fuddy-duds. Wave away all those people who "don't know who Joy Division was and who will never see this movie."
If I were king with dictatorial powers I would have all the Academy know-nothings identified and marginalized, if not expelled. Every organization is only as brave and vibrant and visionary as the amount of deadweight in its midst. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Purge the slackers and deadheads and the fog will lift.
The Chicago Film Festival website says the fest ends tonight (10.17), but the festival awards were announced last Sunday (10.14) on Michael Phillips' Talking Pictures blog/column, which is found on the Chicago Tribune site, and yesterday on Adam Fendelman's HollywoodChicago site.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on October 17, 2007 at 8:37 AM
comment #1
jimjonesiii
says ...
good to see anton furst alive and kicking.
Posted by jimjonesiii
at October 17, 2007 10:19 AM
comment #2
nemo
says ...
I'm from Chicago, and this is the first time in my life I've ever heard anyone living in California describe anyone in Chicago as eccentric or flakes.
Posted by nemo
at October 17, 2007 10:23 AM
comment #3
gruver1
says ...
Wells to Nemo: Exactly. My point being that status quo thinkers will say anything in order to justify and fortify being status quo thinkers.
Posted by gruver1
at October 17, 2007 10:35 AM
comment #4
MiraJeffAICN
says ...
You're not the only one who thought Sam Riley's performance was The Shit.
www.theinsneider.blogspot.com
Posted by MiraJeffAICN
at October 17, 2007 10:44 AM
comment #5
iamjoe
says ...
I had no idea that we in Chicago were considered Film Flakes. The city of Ebert??? I'd be curious to find out how this originated.
Posted by iamjoe
at October 17, 2007 11:21 AM
comment #6
Zimmergirl
says ...
There are a lot of great performances this year. The question isn't whether or not he is amazing -- and certainly not a question of what the critics think. It's really about all of the other potential nominees. Sam Riley might just buried by the end of the year. The only chance he has is if he impresses his fellow actors, which would bring him along for the SAG.
Think about this, though, Jeff, since you're in the business of begging people to vote for him - what do you want to bet the globes will nominate him for the Musical/Comedy category - he'll stand way out in that group and thus have a much better at Oscar. It's really more about how much they loved the film - so if a bunch of boomer voters liked Control enough, well, there you go. But think of all of the even better actors who are going to shaft because it's so crowded this year - people like Viggo Mortensen, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Ethan Hawke, etc. It is a fiercely competitive year and you and whomever that person miraJeff pointed out are the only screaming about Sam Riley. But hey, it's a complete toss up how the race is going to go. We are only in October for god's sake.
Posted by Zimmergirl
at October 17, 2007 11:55 AM
comment #7
Karsten
says ...
As I think 'jimjonesiii' was trying to say... the director's name is Anton Corbijn, not ...Furst.
Posted by Karsten
at October 17, 2007 1:38 PM
comment #8
BurmaShave
says ...
Uh... well that and his film was LAWRENCE OF ARABIA.
Posted by BurmaShave
at October 17, 2007 9:27 PM