As she writes about speaking with Into The Wild's Hal Holbrook, who is perhaps the lead contender for Best Supporting Actor at this stage by virtue of being the reigning old-guy veteran who finally deserves an Oscar after all these years (a.k.a., the Alan Arkin rationale), Awards Daily's Sasha Stone writes that "from the day your kids are born you can never do enough, never be enough, never give enough compared what your hopes and dreams for them are. And parenting is nothing but a long series of mistakes, with minor miracles here and there, that you hope amount to something good in the end."

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on November 4, 2007 at 3:03 PM
comment #1
T. Holly
says ...
Hal Holbrook could be Wells' dad.
Posted by T. Holly
at November 4, 2007 3:42 PM
comment #2
Hallick
says ...
And judging by this picture, Emile Hirsch could be singing "And I ran, I ran so far away..." somewhere outside a Cinnabon near you.
Posted by Hallick
at November 4, 2007 3:52 PM
comment #3
T. Holly
says ...
I mean, you read the whole piece and came away with that? Maybe you miss your family.
Posted by T. Holly
at November 4, 2007 3:53 PM
comment #4
T. Holly
says ...
A wang and a bun Hallick, isn't there some football you should be watching?
Posted by T. Holly
at November 4, 2007 4:01 PM
comment #5
Noel Murray
says ...
Jeff, when you get a chance, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY's Oscar predix in the Holiday Movie Preview issue, which seem a little off to me. I'm especially interested to know where you think AMERICAN GANGSTER stands after its blockbuster opening weekend and positive-but-not-ecstatic reviews. EW has it on their Best Picture front-runner list, in the same issue where they give the movie a "B."
I know you're still in the touting-what-you-love phase and not the guessing-what's-what phase (which believe me I appreciate, especially after I have you shit about your prognostication preoccupation last season), but do you think that the persistence of AMERICAN GANGSTER on all these prediction lists is, as it is with you, a case of people standing up for what they love, or is it the ol' college football rankings dilemma, where a team that started the preseason in the Top 5 has to take more than a knock or two before it drops off the charts?
Posted by Noel Murray
at November 4, 2007 4:09 PM
comment #6
Noel Murray
says ...
Jeff, when you get a chance, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY's Oscar predix in the Holiday Movie Preview issue, which seem a little off to me. I'm especially interested to know where you think AMERICAN GANGSTER stands after its blockbuster opening weekend and positive-but-not-ecstatic reviews. EW has it on their Best Picture front-runner list, in the same issue where they give the movie a "B."
I know you're still in the touting-what-you-love phase and not the guessing-what's-what phase (which believe me I appreciate, especially after I gave you shit about your prognostication preoccupation last season), but do you think that the persistence of AMERICAN GANGSTER on all these prediction lists is, as it is with you, a case of people standing up for what they love, or is it the ol' college football rankings dilemma, where a team that started the preseason in the Top 5 has to take more than a knock or two before it drops off the charts?
Posted by Noel Murray
at November 4, 2007 4:10 PM
comment #7
Hallick
says ...
"A wang and a bun Hallick, isn't there some football you should be watching?"
If wangs and buns were really my thing, then...well yeah, I guess I'd still be watching football.
Posted by Hallick
at November 4, 2007 4:33 PM
comment #8
christian
says ...
Go Hal!
Posted by christian
at November 4, 2007 6:22 PM
comment #9
Daviddb
says ...
What about Andy Griffith in "Waitress"? Another old guy who deserves an Oscar.
Posted by Daviddb
at November 4, 2007 7:03 PM
comment #10
nemo
says ...
If you want a job that takes all your time and energy for a couple of decades, and every step of the way you feel like you're doing it wrong, become a parent.
Posted by nemo
at November 4, 2007 7:12 PM
comment #11
EDouglas
says ...
I thought the rationale behind Alan Arkin was that Eddie Murphy had made Norbit.
Posted by EDouglas
at November 4, 2007 11:24 PM
comment #12
gruver1
says ...
Wells to Ed Douglas: That's true -- "Norbit" killed it for Murphy more than any other factor -- but everyone was also saying, "Give it up for Arkin... he's been at it for decades."
Posted by gruver1
at November 5, 2007 12:00 AM
comment #13
Spacesheik
says ...
He's a good actor, whether he's playing a slimy govt. official in CAPRICORN ONE or a campy Southern Colonel in FLETCH 2 - guys has done lots of flicks and is a solid, dependable elder statesman actor - the kind of guy you cast if you are making movies about US politicians and corrupt judges.
But to me, Hal Holbrook will always be 'Deep Throat.'
Posted by Spacesheik
at November 5, 2007 2:52 AM
comment #14
christian
says ...
And he even appeared in CREEPSHOW...
Posted by christian
at November 5, 2007 8:00 AM
comment #15
Jay T.
says ...
I always liked his scenes in Wall Street...
Posted by Jay T.
at November 5, 2007 8:16 AM
comment #16
Dave
says ...
RE: Creepshow, on a lark, my GF and I watched it off of FIOS On Demand about a month ago. It's still goofy fun, even though now that I'm older, much of it is obviously embarrassing. And I admit, I had *completely* forgotten that Ed Harris was in it (the first segment, Father's Day).
That said, the segment with Holbrook, Fritz Weaver and Adrienne Barbeau is still fantastic. Superb, and it really stands out against the rest of the film.
Posted by Dave
at November 5, 2007 8:45 AM
comment #17
Dave
says ...
As for Into the Wild, I *finally* saw it last week after making plans to see it since it opened.
I was extremely pleased. I felt it was pretty much perfectly balanced between engaging the audience to identify with McCandless and his motivations, and also being suspect of them. That the film made most of its points with so much restraint (especially with the Catharine Keener character) is a credit.
And the cinematography! Goodness, was that a beautifully-shot movie. I really didn't think Sean Penn had it in him to make a movie that glorious. Kudos to him.
As for Holbrook, he was excellent, but an Oscar for that performance is pretty much a gold watch. Nothing truly extraordinary, except that it's solid work from a man I thought was dead-- hell, I knew he was in the movie, and I barely recognized him, he looked a thousand years old. So old, in fact, that I was gripping the arms of my chair hoping that he wouldn't fall when climbing up the hill (seriously, I was waiting for him to break a hip, and waiting to blame Penn for endangering the life & health of an American icon ;-).
Outstanding film, glad I made time to see it on the big screen.
Posted by Dave
at November 5, 2007 8:53 AM