Discland
edited by Jonathan Doyle
Cloverfield [BLU-RAY] (Paramount Home Entertainment, 6.3.2008) Disguised under deliberately goofy, yet deliciously edible-sounding, aliases such as Cheese and Slusho, Matt Reeves' Cloverfield was produced and rushed into theaters under an equally appetizing shroud of secrecy. From last year's incredibly elusive Super Bowl ad to the film's viral marketing campaign, Cloverfield had everybody scratching their heads and drooling in anticipation. Aside from the as-yet untitled title and the Blair Witch-ian visual style, the film's biggest appeal was the enigmatic creature who was last (un)seen hurling the decapitated head of the Statue of Liberty onto the crowded streets of New York City. All we knew about the mysterious beast was that it was big and angry. Now that the highy-anticipated project has come and gone, one question has fortunately been answered: Cloverfield was a major success. (continued)

Upcoming


July 2

Hancock

July 3

The Whackness

July 4

Diminished Capacity

Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson

Holding Trevor

Kabluey

We are Together

July 9

Full Battle Rattle

July 11

A Man Named Pearl

August

Eight Miles High

Garden Party

Harold

Hellboy II: The Golden Army

Journey to the Center of the Earth

Meet Dave

Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired

The Stone Angel

July 18

A Very British Gangster

Before I Forget

The Dark Knight

The Doorman

Felon

Lou Reed's Berlin

Mad Detective

Mamma Mia!

Space Chimps

Take

Transsiberian

July 22

Two Tickets to Paradise

July 23

Boy A




 

Bear Sterns view of WGA strike

"From Wall Street's perspective, we estimate the impact of accepting the [writers'] proposal is largely negligible," Bear Stearns wrote in a report last week.

If the AMPTP gave the striking WGA everything its negotiators are asking for, the world-renowned banking, brokerage and investment firm estimates that "the $120 million figure would carry an average impact of less than 1% on annual earnings per share for the media companies.

"That does not factor in any concessions by the writers' side (the WGA), where the principal issue is a desire for a piece of ad dollars from new-media distribution. The potentially small financial impact suggests that studios (Alliance of Motion Pictures and Television Producers) are more concerned about setting a precedent in new-media revenue sharing."

According to Wikipedia, Bear Stearns had total capital of approximately $66.7 billion and total assets of $350.4 billion as of November 2006. According to the April 2005 issue of Institutional Investor magazine, Bear Stearns is the seventh largest securities firm in terms of total capital.

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on December 30, 2007 at 01:31 AM

comment #1

Gordie Lachance [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Thank you. This is exactly what I said yesterday in response to the Cieply article.

The writers got fooled in '88 when the AMPTP was "setting a precedent" regarding VHS residuals.

It's not going to happen again.

Posted by Gordie Lachance [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 03:24 AM

comment #2

Mumbleboy [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

That's not very surprising to me. From everything I've read, it never seemed that the writer's demands were that outrageous. Even if the studio's are being hardnosed with the writers to avoid setting a precedence, what's the worst that would happen if the SAG, DGA, and WGA all got similar deals. Less than 3% per share. And that's would keep me fat with new episodes of Lost and Jon Stewart. Sounds like the studios just don't want to share any of their pie. They're just the bakery, the pie is delicious without them.

First time poster. Long time lover... I mean reader.

Posted by Mumbleboy [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 03:30 AM

comment #3

Michael [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Well I feel better now, and so should the studios. I mean, Bear Sterns did such a good job with their handling of mortgage assets (read those reports for high comedy)...

Yet I still want the writers to win. But not because Bear Sterns said so.

Posted by Michael [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 07:25 AM

comment #4

Jay T. [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I have to say, I'm proud of the WGA for holding out this long. The studios and networks are really going to regret being so stubborn. All of this "we're willing to scrap the next entire TV season" is total bullshit and I think the WGA knows it and will call their bluff. Meanwhile, for those of us who publish on the web, it's "great" news because those ad dollars being pulled from television will need to go somewhere.

Posted by Jay T. [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 08:48 AM

comment #5

truefaith [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I just read in EW that the major Hollywood studios made over 1 billion dollars in just the foregin receipts alone! (WB made over 2 billion dollars and is looking to make more after I AM LEGEND has run its course). Hollywood has the money to pay the writers.

Posted by truefaith [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 11:06 AM

comment #6

christian [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

So who will go broke if a few pennies are tossed at the writers?

Posted by christian [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 11:40 AM

comment #7

Sean [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

So does this mean that Bear Stearns has proof that the studios are already making money off of the Internet?

Because if they aren't, then giving up a percentage of the Internet profits before they even start to make a profit wouldn't "cost" the studios anything; they wouldn't have lost anything which they already had (this press release is still shaping it as if the writers are trying to take money out of the studios pockets when they are merely trying to get a share of the money before it gets to the studio).

And if they are already making money off of the Internet, then that should be pointed out every time they publicly lie and say they can't figure out any way to make money off of Internet distribution.

Posted by Sean [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 12:33 PM

comment #8

delbomber [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Data from 2006 (or 2005!) is akin to prescribing drugs to a patient today based on his symptoms three years ago.

Bear Sterns is still very, very big, but anyone who owns a sliver of BSC will tell you this is NOT November of 2006.

Posted by delbomber [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 30, 2007 07:01 PM

Post a Comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?