as an iphoner and a film lover i obviously agree with mr. lynch here. but when i'm on the subway and plowing through a season of the west wing... i'm convinced that it's a lovely means of watching most (but not all) television.
Well a lot of TV, until recently at least, was designed for smaller sets etc...not everything had HBO budgets etc...so I don't see a problem with watching some shows on smaller screens. The point gets across, and it's not like everything has clues creeping from every which way like Lost, which benefits from a bigger TV screen.
If anyone has seen Dennis Hopper's interview on the Blue Velvet disc in which he discusses Lynch's aversion to saying 'that word' in the script, "fucking telephone" is a great quote and delivery.
It's interesting. There's actually two arguments in play at the moment. There's Lynch's, which is that movies designed to play on a big screen should not be watched on a small display, because the experience will be diminished. The other argument posed recently by Spielberg was that if online and mobile filmmaking takes off as a legitimate format, it will decimate film language -- he foresees a situation worse than TV, where because of the small player sizes, filmmakers will only be shooting in close-up with no medium or wide.
Lynch is off base here. Sure watching Lawrence of Arabia on an iPhone is not the way to go. However smaller scale films and documentaries are very watchable on a 3.5" screen. When viewed a foot away from your face, the screen is roughly the same size as watching a 27" tv from across the room. Not the best way to watch a feature though. Lynch himself has promoted short films. I actually think the intimate nature of watching something like The Grandmother on an iPhone might be better than being heckled for watching it in the accompany of others.
Well, bad filmmakers maybe. But I don't know that that's any worse than directors in the old days who shot everything in masters like it was a stage play.
I use plenty of wide shots in my pieces. I love well-composed wides. I think it comes down to the filmmaker and his understanding of film language. You can make any shot work for any format, so long as you know what you're doing.
I don't know how long anyone's battery really lasts for, but I'd be surprised if it would last the length of a feature film anyway, as playing video files probably uses up the most energy.
I don't necessarily think the size of the screen is the problem, it's just all the other shit you're doing instead of absorbing the movie-- riding the subway, for example, watching for your stop, and god, she's cute, oh and that crazy person is doing something, and take a sip of your coffee, did I miss my stop, how many to go, did I get a transfer? So much getting lost in the moment.
The only way to watch a movie is on Super 8 through a tiny viewfinder on an editing/splicing device. Or, failing that, on 16mm running through one of those old Moviolas from the 1940s. That is true cinema!
comment #1
Aguirre
says ...
as an iphoner and a film lover i obviously agree with mr. lynch here. but when i'm on the subway and plowing through a season of the west wing... i'm convinced that it's a lovely means of watching most (but not all) television.
Posted by Aguirre
at January 5, 2008 3:27 PM
comment #2
Dan Revill
says ...
Well a lot of TV, until recently at least, was designed for smaller sets etc...not everything had HBO budgets etc...so I don't see a problem with watching some shows on smaller screens. The point gets across, and it's not like everything has clues creeping from every which way like Lost, which benefits from a bigger TV screen.
Posted by Dan Revill
at January 5, 2008 3:52 PM
comment #3
Craptastic
says ...
That is one of the best things this site has ever posted.
HAZZAAAAA!
Posted by Craptastic
at January 5, 2008 3:55 PM
comment #4
AJW
says ...
If anyone has seen Dennis Hopper's interview on the Blue Velvet disc in which he discusses Lynch's aversion to saying 'that word' in the script, "fucking telephone" is a great quote and delivery.
("That word" is not 'telephone'.)
Posted by AJW
at January 5, 2008 4:24 PM
comment #5
mutinyco
says ...
It's interesting. There's actually two arguments in play at the moment. There's Lynch's, which is that movies designed to play on a big screen should not be watched on a small display, because the experience will be diminished. The other argument posed recently by Spielberg was that if online and mobile filmmaking takes off as a legitimate format, it will decimate film language -- he foresees a situation worse than TV, where because of the small player sizes, filmmakers will only be shooting in close-up with no medium or wide.
Posted by mutinyco
at January 5, 2008 5:01 PM
comment #6
D.Z.
says ...
mutiny: Don't they already shoot in close-ups?
Posted by D.Z.
at January 5, 2008 5:37 PM
comment #7
mutinyco
says ...
Who? Theatrical filmmakers or online?
Posted by mutinyco
at January 5, 2008 6:11 PM
comment #8
MathewM
says ...
Lynch is off base here. Sure watching Lawrence of Arabia on an iPhone is not the way to go. However smaller scale films and documentaries are very watchable on a 3.5" screen. When viewed a foot away from your face, the screen is roughly the same size as watching a 27" tv from across the room. Not the best way to watch a feature though. Lynch himself has promoted short films. I actually think the intimate nature of watching something like The Grandmother on an iPhone might be better than being heckled for watching it in the accompany of others.
Posted by MathewM
at January 5, 2008 7:08 PM
comment #9
D.Z.
says ...
mutiny: Theatrical filmmakers.
Posted by D.Z.
at January 5, 2008 7:25 PM
comment #10
Josh Massey
says ...
Those 30 seconds make up for Inland Empire.
Well, almost...
... OK, not even close, but it was great.
Posted by Josh Massey
at January 5, 2008 7:33 PM
comment #11
mutinyco
says ...
Well, bad filmmakers maybe. But I don't know that that's any worse than directors in the old days who shot everything in masters like it was a stage play.
I use plenty of wide shots in my pieces. I love well-composed wides. I think it comes down to the filmmaker and his understanding of film language. You can make any shot work for any format, so long as you know what you're doing.
Posted by mutinyco
at January 5, 2008 7:58 PM
comment #12
lazarus
says ...
I don't know how long anyone's battery really lasts for, but I'd be surprised if it would last the length of a feature film anyway, as playing video files probably uses up the most energy.
Posted by lazarus
at January 5, 2008 8:34 PM
comment #13
christian
says ...
I heart Lynch.
Seeing him on the corner of Hollywood and La Brea next to a cow might just be my favorite Los Angeles moment.
Posted by christian
at January 5, 2008 9:47 PM
comment #14
PokeyJones
says ...
I don't necessarily think the size of the screen is the problem, it's just all the other shit you're doing instead of absorbing the movie-- riding the subway, for example, watching for your stop, and god, she's cute, oh and that crazy person is doing something, and take a sip of your coffee, did I miss my stop, how many to go, did I get a transfer? So much getting lost in the moment.
Posted by PokeyJones
at January 6, 2008 6:51 AM
comment #15
Chicago48
says ...
The directors and producers should be on strike against Iphones!
Posted by Chicago48
at January 6, 2008 1:20 PM
comment #16
bluefugue
says ...
The only way to watch a movie is on Super 8 through a tiny viewfinder on an editing/splicing device. Or, failing that, on 16mm running through one of those old Moviolas from the 1940s. That is true cinema!
Posted by bluefugue
at January 6, 2008 5:04 PM
comment #17
Terry McCarty
says ...
I love it, especially with the Mark Mothersbaugh Mac/PC ad jingle underscoring Lynch.
Posted by Terry McCarty
at January 7, 2008 1:36 AM