The one-two punch of Eliot Spitzer and David Patterson, absorbed as a single act, is hilarious. It seems very wise of Patterson to have told all. He knows everyone is spent over the Spitzer scandal, and that most people in the press don't have the energy to do anything but sigh, chuckle or shake their heads.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on March 18, 2008 at 12:14 PM
comment #1
Fred Mounts
says ...
Not to mention that poor Jim McGreevey can't generate any interest in his stories of man-on-man-on-wife sex.
Posted by Fred Mounts
at March 18, 2008 12:36 PM
comment #2
CinemaPhreek
says ...
Just might want to correct your spelling - Paterson only has one "T"
Posted by CinemaPhreek
at March 18, 2008 1:39 PM
comment #3
Rich S.
says ...
Speaking of outrage, I'm wondering how Sean Penn can make Milk, which I would imagine is an appeal for understanding of tolerance and gay lifestyles, and then try to rile up a crowd of extras with the statement that "Sean Hannity [is] the butt boy of Rupert Murdoch."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/18/DDNDVJJHL.DTL
Sounds rather inconsistent to me.
Posted by Rich S.
at March 19, 2008 6:43 AM
comment #4
le corbeau
says ...
Another Paterson adultery story today-- he got her a state job in the process.
Oy. I'm glad it's not my state. In Illinois, nobody's fucking, they're too busy buying property next to Tony Rezko.
Posted by le corbeau
at March 19, 2008 7:45 AM
comment #5
D.Z.
says ...
Rich: He means butt boy as in ass-kisser, not butt boy as in "gays are evil".
Mgmax: "In Illinois, nobody's fucking, they're too busy buying property next to Tony Rezko."
Or they're Bush-appointed and using their power at HUD to get property for one of their wealthy lobbyist buddies.
Posted by D.Z.
at March 19, 2008 8:41 PM