Discland
edited by Jonathan Doyle
Mafioso (The Criterion Collection, 3.18.2008) Nino Badalamenti is a supervisor in a car manufacturing plant who hasn't taken a vacation in over two years. On his way out the door to visit his beloved childhood hometown of Sicily -- with his blonde wife and daughters -- Nino is handed a package by his boss and asked to deliver it to a powerful and influential Sicilian gangster named Don Vincenzo. Once in Sicily, Nino has a hoot seeing friends and family, but his wife has trouble fitting in and is unfairly dismissed as a snob by Nino's family. Even more worrisome, Nino finds himself entangled in an intricate web of secret mafioso dealings and is eventually sent on an unexpectedly... elaborate errand. (continued)

W casting calls

HE reactions to Oliver Stone's casting choices on W, his about-to-shoot Dubya drama which will star Josh Brolin. Elizabeth Banks, 34, seems too young to play First Lady Laura Bush, who was just shy of 50 when her husband became the Texas governor and 54 when he was inaugurated as President on 1.20.01. James Cromwell as George H.W. Bush -- perfect, but he'll have to be de-aged. Ellen Burstyn as Barbara Bush -- fine.

Finding the right guy to portray Dick Cheney will be a make-or-breaker. It'll be more of a matter of someone who can get the voice right -- "So?" Richard Dreyfuss?

Stone wrote the screenplay with his Wall Street co-writer Stanley Weiser. W "is expected to be ready for distribution possibly by the November presidential elections and certainly before Bush leaves the White House in January," Variety's Michael Fleming wrote yesterday.

Shine a Light<< previous | next >>Devil in the Details

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on March 27, 2008 at 07:57 AM

comment #1

George Prager [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Cheney? I guess David Huddleston is too old.

Posted by George Prager [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:39 AM

comment #2

chicbn872 [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Has anybody read this thing? Does it just completely put W on a skewer or what? I get the feeling that Oliver may actually be fair and impartial here. After all, he was when he made "Nixon".

Posted by chicbn872 [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:42 AM

comment #3

mizerock [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I'm still trying to figure out why this movie needs to be made. What is it going to add to the public conversation? What can be shown that hasn't already been discussed, ad nauseum, for the past 8 years? I'm willing to believe that Stone is going to try and make his depection "fair", but that actually makes things worse. Republicans will hate it for being too harsh and biased, Democrats will hate it for pulling too many punches.

This concept would only work as a movie-of-the-week impersonation spectacle. If that. Am I missing something here? Is this for everyone that never read a blog or an Op-Ed piece, and yet still pays attention to movies? Recent Oliver Stone movies, no less? Maybe I'm underestimating the size of the intended demographic.

Posted by mizerock [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:43 AM

comment #4

tjfar67 [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Cheney? Philip Seymore Hoffman? Just a thought...

Posted by tjfar67 [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:43 AM

comment #5

tjfar67 [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Cheney? Philip Seymore Hoffman? Just a thought...

Posted by tjfar67 [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:43 AM

comment #6

Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Here, I have some other suggestions in line with Stone's approach:

Donald Rumsfeld:
http://tinyurl.com/36ov5q

Paul Wolfowitz:
http://tinyurl.com/35btkr

Lewis "Scooter" Libbey:
http://tinyurl.com/32o92n

Posted by Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:47 AM

comment #7

Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Damn, sorry that last one didn't work. You get the idea.

"I get the feeling that Oliver may actually be fair and impartial here. After all, he was when he made "Nixon"."

He was somewhat less than condemnatory, but he was always totally bonkers, taking the comic highlight of the Nixon administration (that time he went and talked football at the Lioncoln Memorial with student protesters) and turning it into some weird conspiratorial shit about how "they" forced him into war (presumably the same they who planned the assassination of the Vietnam peacemaker Kennedy).

I don't expect him to reach those heights of coherence on the subject of the current president.

Posted by Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:51 AM

comment #8

Geoff [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Prince Philip and George H.W. Bush.

Posted by Geoff [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:51 AM

comment #9

Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Sorry, meant to say "also totally bonkers," not "always" which is not true, much of the film is straightforward presentation of familiar scenes very similar to various TV movies on the same subject.

Posted by Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:52 AM

comment #10

UnChien [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I really don't know what to expect from this film. Stone's last truly great film was Nixon (though I like U-turn alot), and World Trade Center was really embarassing (when Jesus revealed himself holding a bottle of water me and my fellow audience broke down in a hysterical laughterfit). Anyway, here's hoping for a return to form.

As for Cheney-casting; too bad Lawrence Tierney is already dead.

Posted by UnChien [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 08:57 AM

comment #11

Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Not really OT: good, not especially partisan piece on post-9/11 filmmaking and the obsession with the 70s in Hollywood at The Atlantic:

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200804/iraq-movies

Posted by Mgmax [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 09:27 AM

comment #12

rr3333 [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Stone's washed up ....

I dont expect anything close to greatness.

Sad, but true.

Posted by rr3333 [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 09:51 AM

comment #13

SmilingPolitely [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I cast my vote for William Hurt as Cheney.

As for Banks, that's definitely not an obvious choice. She must have had a some kind of fucking great screen test with Brolin, and she just couldn't be denied. For a young Laura Bush, as far as appearances are concerned, her resemblance is fine. I guess a good chunk of the movie will focus on Bush and Laura in their 20's,30's, and 40's which would make the casting of Banks make some sense.

I'm rooting for Stone, and I'm hoping the patriotic and conspiracy-free WTC afforded him a chance to start making the sort of rabble-rousing movies that he's best at.

Posted by SmilingPolitely [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 09:58 AM

comment #14

115thDreamer [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Dreyfuss as Cheney would work. He certainly played a Rove/Cheney type of advisor in John Sayles' "Silver City", but hardly anyone saw that, so I think he could do it again. One of the few bits I remember from the flick is Dreyfuss & another character sitting in a balcony, listening to Dreyfuss' politician boss rehearsing a speech. The boss is outlining some policy but speaking in vague terms, and the guy sitting w/ Dreyfuss doesn't understand, and when he asks Dreyfuss "What does that mean?", Dreyfuss bluntly responds "No Handouts for Homos".

Posted by 115thDreamer [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 10:05 AM

comment #15

JChasse [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Stone cast Joan Allen, who I always thought to be very attractive, as Pat Nixon. It kind of threw me to see a Pat Nixon that made me want to do to her what Nixon did to the country.

Posted by JChasse [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 10:14 AM

comment #16

Rob [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I think William Hurt as Cheney is a great idea.

I hope they dramatize Laura's high school hit-and-run incident. With Banks in the part, it could be like something out of a John Waters movie.

Posted by Rob [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 10:26 AM

comment #17

shepherd12345 [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

You know who would have been a lights-out, kickass, dead-perfect Dick Cheney: J.T. Walsh.

RIP.

Posted by shepherd12345 [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 10:31 AM

comment #18

BurmaShave [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I'm afraid this is turning into something insane. As in Val Kilmer as King Phillip snarling in an Irish accent insane.

Posted by BurmaShave [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 10:39 AM

comment #19

frankbooth [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Elizabeth Banks?!! Why not just cast Adriana Lima or Angelina Jolie?

Most ridiculous casting ever, unless they bring in Rick Baker to do major prosthetics.

Posted by frankbooth [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 10:52 AM

comment #20

Dzayson [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Anyone out there watch 24? That guy that plays Mike Novick is a dead ringer for Cheney.

Posted by Dzayson [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 10:54 AM

comment #21

Geoff [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Dzayson, I agree completely. It will make me laugh extremely hard at first though.

Posted by Geoff [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 11:06 AM

comment #22

chicbn872 [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Jude Ciccolella is the guy from 24 and he does look like him.

I agree with what most folks are saying here. I think it's Olliie Stone's weak attempt at grabbing some relevance. "Alexander" is a disgrace and "World Trade Center" made a few bucks but it's also quite lame. If he was really interested in making a movie about W, it wouldn't be fast-tracked like this in hopes of getting it in theaters in time for November. That is just insane. Instead, why not have a movie in the theaters while some folks are already in a political mood?

Posted by chicbn872 [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 11:07 AM

comment #23

oakling [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Good gravy, how can anyone be too old to play Cheney?
I hope they show all his drug use and drunk driving and.... (Bush's, not Cheney's. As far as I know.)

Posted by oakling [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 11:28 AM

comment #24

Mumbleboy [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I've heard elsewhere (ie Chud) that they're going after Robert Robert Duvall for Cheney.

Although I wholeheartedly agree with 24's Mike Novick. Not the actor, but the character.

Posted by Mumbleboy [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 11:32 AM

comment #25

Dzayson [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Cheney's actually got TWO DUIs. TWO!

Posted by Dzayson [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 27, 2008 05:51 PM

comment #26

TL [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Too soon! We still don't know the extent of Bush's crimes to make a judgment on his presidency on celluloid.

Posted by TL [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 1, 2008 08:21 AM

Post a Comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?