Discland
edited by Jonathan Doyle
Mafioso (The Criterion Collection, 3.18.2008) Nino Badalamenti is a supervisor in a car manufacturing plant who hasn't taken a vacation in over two years. On his way out the door to visit his beloved childhood hometown of Sicily -- with his blonde wife and daughters -- Nino is handed a package by his boss and asked to deliver it to a powerful and influential Sicilian gangster named Don Vincenzo. Once in Sicily, Nino has a hoot seeing friends and family, but his wife has trouble fitting in and is unfairly dismissed as a snob by Nino's family. Even more worrisome, Nino finds himself entangled in an intricate web of secret mafioso dealings and is eventually sent on an unexpectedly... elaborate errand. (continued)

Upcoming


July 2

Hancock

July 3

The Whackness

July 4

Diminished Capacity

Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson

Holding Trevor

Kabluey

We are Together

July 9

Full Battle Rattle

July 11

A Man Named Pearl

August

Eight Miles High

Garden Party

Harold

Hellboy II: The Golden Army

Journey to the Center of the Earth

Meet Dave

Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired

The Stone Angel

July 18

A Very British Gangster

Before I Forget

The Dark Knight

The Doorman

Felon

Lou Reed's Berlin

Mad Detective

Mamma Mia!

Space Chimps

Take

Transsiberian

July 22

Two Tickets to Paradise

July 23

Boy A




 

Cusack in the Tank

As Defamer's sum-up points out, Jon Cusack's War, Inc. has gone into the tank after showing at the Tribeca Film Festival. Reviews from N.Y. Post critic Lou Lumenick, Spoutblog's Karina Longworth and the Hollywood Reporter's Frank Sheck are viewable for all to see. But HE reader Joseph Kay has something interesting to say besides.


Jon Cusack, Joan Cusack in War, Inc.

"Apologies if you've covered/couldn't care less about this, but John Cusack's War, Inc. silently crept into theaters here in Toronto this week, and I believe nowhere else," he writes. "The reason for the stealth, I'm guessing, having seen the film last night, is that it's pretty much an unmitigated disaster, messy and all-over-the-place and largely nonsensical

"But it does have a point-of-view (albeit very on-the-nose) and in a world where every third major release is seemingly about the romantic chemistry generated by the metaphor of street dancing, at least Cusack and his partners were trying to do something interesting and different.

"The big problem is they were shooting for the darkly comic impact of Dr. Strangelove, obviously an impossible target for anybody except maybe Charlie Kaufman, and also the film is very weirdly grafted onto the template for Grosse Point Blank , a strange decision which seems to have the mutual effect of hurting War, Inc. while you watch it and Grosse Point retroactively."

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on April 29, 2008 at 01:51 PM

comment #1

Josh Massey [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Just from the looks of the trailer, I bet the script started as Grosse Pointe II and became an original when a studio wouldn't sign on for a sequel.

Posted by Josh Massey [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 02:40 PM

comment #2

storymark [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

How long has this movie been in the can. I saw a trailer for it on some DVD at least a year ago, if not more.

Posted by storymark [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 02:42 PM

comment #3

storymark [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

There should be a question mark at the end of my first sentence.... (must remember to hit preview first).

Good call on the Grosse Point Blank 2 vibe. I thought (even hoped) it was that when I saw the trailer.

Posted by storymark [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 02:44 PM

comment #4

erniesouchak [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Charlie Kaufman couldn't make anything approaching "Dr. Strangelove" if he tried, tried and tried again.

Posted by erniesouchak [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 02:59 PM

comment #5

Edward [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Storymark, thanks for admiting you screw up when you use this damn comment box too. Crap, I have a masters degree and still can't use correct grammer or sentence structure. Preview, what a novel idea! Proofread? Me!

Posted by Edward [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 03:05 PM

comment #6

actionman [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Sounds like a low-rent Lord of War, which I think is one of the most underrated films of this decade.

Posted by actionman [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 03:06 PM

comment #7

Richardson [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

'Lord of War' is weird when you watch 'The Weather Man' anytime near it. I actually like both movies, but it seems like Cage forced changes on both to make his characters almost identical (albeit, they end up in different places).

Posted by Richardson [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 03:23 PM

comment #8

Jay T. [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

When I first saw the trailer, about 1/2 way through I said to my wife, "they made a grosse pointe blank sequel?" -- then it wasn't. Anyway, yeah, I think I'll skip this out of fear of it ruining my love for that film, although I doubt that would actually happen (The Two Jakes doesn't make me like Chinatown any less).

Posted by Jay T. [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 03:23 PM

comment #9

Arran [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

I love Cusack and would rather see an ambitious mess than another dance movie. I'll be seeing it regardless of what anyone says.

And nothing can possibly hinder my love of Grosse Point Blank - still one of my top 5 movies.

Posted by Arran [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 03:30 PM

comment #10

moviemaniac2002 [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

It may be that because Bush and Cheney are
such horrifying caricatures in real life, there's
no way to effectively lampoon them...(as in
the crash-and-burn of "American Dreamz")
We're already living in a country which, for
eight miserable years, has been in the grips of
Strangelov-ian characters come to life - an imbecilic president and a coterie of lunatic war-mongers who probably consider the 4000 U.S.
deaths as 'gettin' our hair mussed a little'.

Posted by moviemaniac2002 [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 04:02 PM

comment #11

Mr. Blood Vessel [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Posted by Arran at April 29, 2008 03:30 PM

It may be that because Bush and Cheney are
such horrifying caricatures in real life, there's
no way to effectively lampoon them...(as in
the crash-and-burn of "American Dreamz")
We're already living in a country which, for
eight miserable years, has been in the grips of
Strangelov-ian characters come to life - an imbecilic president and a coterie of lunatic war-mongers who probably consider the 4000 U.S.
deaths as 'gettin' our hair mussed a little'.

Bush isn't stupid, he just doesn't care.
which is much worse.

Posted by Mr. Blood Vessel [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 04:37 PM

comment #12

Undercover Brother [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Cusack wanted to make a sequel to GPB some time ago. I remember some interview with him stating as much and that he had started writing a script. Apparently his script washed out and he rejiggered it into this mess. It sounds terrible. I too saw the preview ages ago and was wondering why it all felt like a GPB sequel, but wasn't really.

I'm equally mortified that someone invoked the dreaded name of Southland Tales as something comparable. That's more than enough to send me screaming from the room. I'd rather force my hand into a meat grinder than watch that shit again.

Posted by Undercover Brother [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2008 05:23 PM

comment #13

val [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

That's too bad, the trailer was interesting and I was looking forward to it.

Posted by val [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2008 04:39 AM

comment #14

Richardson [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

'Southland Tales' is the most fascinating utter and complete failure I have ever seen.

Posted by Richardson [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 30, 2008 04:39 PM

Post a Comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?