December 31
January 2
Cargo 200
January 7
Silent Light
January 9
How About You
Yonkers Joe
January 16
Cherry Blossoms
January 21
Of Time and the City
I suggested yesterday that Envelope columnist Elizabeth Snead should have attempted an explanation why the Sex and the City is blowing off a big-ass debut screening at the Cannes Film Festival in favor of one in London, especially since Sarah Jessica Parker said Cannes was a possibility in a Snead article that ran on 3.14.
Today Snead ran a portion of an interview with an anonymous Warner Bros. insider, who offered at least a partial answer to the London-not-Cannes question. "A WB insider who refused to go on record told me, 'One word: recession,'" Snead wrote,. "[The source added] that movie studios were feeling the pinch of a devalued U.S. dollar and that a Cannes fete done right would be far more costly than a red carpet event in London."
I don't believe this is the entire reason for one shaved millisecond. There's no doubting the fact that Cannes is going to be horrifically expensive for everyone this year, but London is no cheap deal either. Everything hurts when you're in London. I was there last March and I know. It's just as bad as France. So if you ask me the "London is cheaper" explanation is at least partly bullshit.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on April 22, 2008 at 1:11 PM
comment #1
Terry McCarty
says ...
Given the look of the trailer, I'm guessing that Time Warner would rather have a London opening since the British press might go easier on the film than the assembled critics at Cannes.
I'm sure the brickbats THE DA VINCI CODE received at Cannes is a major factor.
Posted by Terry McCarty
at April 22, 2008 2:09 PM
Post a comment