July 2
July 3
July 4
Diminished Capacity
Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson
We are Together
July 9
July 11
August
Eight Miles High
Journey to the Center of the Earth
Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
July 18
A Very British Gangster
Before I Forget
Felon
Lou Reed's Berlin
Transsiberian
July 22
July 23
Do Democratic primary voters in Pennsylvania or Indiana care about the political endorsements of celebrities -- even working-class icons like Bruce Springsteen? I wonder. Springsteen will probably stage a bunch of concerts- slash-Obama rallies in the fall. He did this for Kerry in '04, of course, and look what happened. Maybe he has a certain influence. Not with the serious Pennsylvania dumbasses (i.e., the racist flannel-shirt rubes in the "Alabama" sections of the state) but maybe with the 50-something middle-classers who bought his records and cassettes in the '70s and '80s.

"At the moment, critics have tried to diminish Senator Obama through the exaggeration of certain of his comments and relationships," Springsteen said on his website. While these matters are worthy of some discussion, they have been ripped out of the context and fabric of the man's life and vision, so well described in his excellent book, Dreams From My Father, often in order to distract us from discussing the real issues: war and peace, the fight for economic and racial justice, reaffirming our Constitution, and the protection and enhancement of our environment."
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on April 16, 2008 at 05:31 PM
comment #1
says ...Just checking in with an update from PA. We used to respect Springsteen for his working class NJ roots. But then in 1996 we figured out what "Born in The USA" really meant and that was that. There's only one celebrity whose opinion we could trust, Number 5, The Intimidator. But once Dale died, we try not to think about the complex issues. We just pray and shoot our guns.
Posted by MDOC
at April 16, 2008 07:20 PM
comment #2
says ...Springsteen for Senate used to be a joke. Now it's not. He needs to do something he's absurdly eloquent for a person of his type. Usually they're wishy-washy and inarticulate about their art but he's wham-bam and tells it like it is.
I'm also interested to hear more about Springsteen describing Obama as having a vision of America he described in his music.
Posted by BurmaShave
at April 16, 2008 07:30 PM
Posted by Mgmax
at April 16, 2008 07:32 PM
comment #4
says ...Is there really somebody going to a Springsteen concert who doesn't know that he's going to support any Democrat running? Are there real people in the world who have been holding out this long, only to be overwhelmed by the sheer rhetoric power of Bruce Springsteen's endorsement?
Depending on Bruce Springsteen to win over the working class.. has that ever worked for the Democrats?
Posted by Richardson
at April 16, 2008 07:40 PM
comment #5
says ...Mgmax,
Considering Pennsylvania has voted Democrat in the last 4 presidential elections, the state should probably be of some use to the folks here. But since they are leaning towards the wrong Democrat, the state is full of rubes and idiots. Forget PA Obama supporters, it was a done deal from the start, mainly due to the enormously popular Govenor Ed Rendell's early support for Clinton and demographics (PA's huge elderly population). Don't forget, Hillary's dad played football for Penn State, plus he was a Republican. So don't nuke us please, Jeff will be singing our praises come general election time as we do our part to stop the villainous John McCain.
Posted by MDOC
at April 16, 2008 07:45 PM
Posted by iamanerd
at April 16, 2008 08:02 PM
Posted by iamanerd
at April 16, 2008 08:02 PM
Posted by corey3rd
at April 16, 2008 08:34 PM
Posted by alynch
at April 16, 2008 08:39 PM
Posted by Zimmergirl
at April 16, 2008 08:51 PM
comment #11
says ...These people are dumbasses for not being weak-willed enough to be influenced by what a singer has to say? This is an outrageous statement to make. Perhaps it's because I just woke from a nap and haven't put on my prescription-strength cynicism-ignoring glasses.
If someone has a substantive, seriouis reason for not wanting to support Sen. Obama, then they're a rube and a dumbass? And I've read on this site that the Clinton campaign has been called a venomous, vicious collection of vipers. How is this attitude any different?
Posted by MrClever
at April 16, 2008 09:05 PM
Posted by Craptastic
at April 16, 2008 09:22 PM
Posted by Jeremy Smith
at April 16, 2008 09:38 PM
comment #14
says ...Jeffrey Wells - the one-man living, breathing example of how Democrats manage to lose presidential elections.
"If we're going to win back the White House, we really need to make a stronger effort to win the votes of those gun-toting, bible-waving, pickup truck-driving rural hayseeds".
Posted by Walter Sobchak
at April 16, 2008 11:17 PM
Posted by Craptastic
at April 17, 2008 12:09 AM
Posted by christian
at April 17, 2008 01:22 AM
Posted by thegreatmags
at April 17, 2008 05:16 AM
comment #18
says ...Springsteen supporting Obama, not that big a surprise. MDOC, who gives a shit about nascar? Why do you watch cars go around in a circle? I'd rather watch the grass grow. Pennsylvania will go to Hillary, unfortunately. Obama just can't win the the 'Alabama' part of the state. Springsteen's endorsement won't equal too many votes.
Posted by Movie Watcher
at April 17, 2008 05:53 AM
Posted by Movie Watcher
at April 17, 2008 05:55 AM
Posted by Mgmax
at April 17, 2008 06:19 AM
comment #21
says ...Sometimes I wonder which outcome of the election would make this website more entertaining.
If McCain wins, Jeffrey will just chalk it up as Bush III and the triumph of Gorilla Nation and quickly lose interest. So that's no fun.
If Hillary wins, then Jeffrey will burst into flames and rage, rage against the dying of the light. But I think this will only last a couple months, unless Obama continues to act as the loyal opposition, in which case Jeffrey may stay interested a little longer.
The most interesting outcome would be an Obama victory. Because no matter how smart or prepared Obama is, we aren't heading into a "golden age" any time soon, and President Obama will be taking quite a bit of heat for at least the first year of his administration.
Will Jeffrey stay invested enough in his chosen one to actually stick by him and defend him? I'm sure he will take great offense to the first few media assaults, but how long will that last? And what if Obama actually does screw something up, if for no other reason than because his inexperience? Will Jeffrey admit the mistake, or try to pass blame?
Fascinating stuff for the denizens of HE.
Posted by Rich S.
at April 17, 2008 06:41 AM
comment #22
says ...Burma, the full implication of Springsteen's statement should be obvious -- "meet me in the land of hope and dreams". Springsteen has always written about the clash between reality and illusion that is distinctly embedded in the American way of life (particularly the "blue-collar" class), and Obama is the first candidate in a long time who has broached the idea of uniting the promises imbedded in political rhetoric with frank talk about the reality of our current state of affairs and what it's going to take to turn things around.
I seriously doubt this "endorsement" will affect a lot of votes, but Springsteen's agenda has always been to lead by example, and rational-minded political engagement, regardless of affiliation, is definitely something we need more of.
Posted by p.Vice
at April 17, 2008 06:42 AM
comment #23
says ...Wow, now that I know I am a "gun-toting, bible-waving, pickup truck-driving rural hayseed", I definitely will vote Democrat in November. I'll also tell all the people I grew up that still live in PA, who I assume are "gun-toting, bible-waving, pickup truck-driving rural hayseeds", to vote for Obama for sure now. Once I tell them that an elitist leftie insulted them, I'm sure they will see it the elitist left way.
Posted by chicbn872
at April 17, 2008 07:24 AM
comment #24
says ...Anyone that thinks Bruce Springsteen will effect anyones vote is delusional.
These Hollywood far lefty's live in a fantasy world where they think they can effect anything.
Really Boss? Thats your views on war, economy, healthcare? Seeing as you are really educated and give more than 50% of your wealth to charity we must believe u. LOL
Posted by Dave Polands Gut
at April 17, 2008 07:45 AM
comment #25
says ...Wells to Craptastic & Walter Sobchak: Only on HE discussions do guys like you say, "Whoa...did you just coarsely and bluntly describe the racist leanings of the Pennsylvania knuckle-dragging lunchbucket set...the ones who live in the working-class towns in the center and western regions of the state? Wow...how could you do such a thing, even if they exist?" Lots of people out there have called a spade a spade. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said "there are some folks in our state who are going to have trouble voting for a black candidate." SNL's Tracey Morgan said, "We live in a racist country...the end." But the news show chatterers never just SAYTHIS, and after a while we get to thinking it's about this, that or the other thing. It's not always adult or admirable to mince words and tapdance around the truth of the matter. But only on HE talkbacks do people say, "My God...you can't say that about Pennsylvania's working people!" Trust me, there are such things as blind spots, as people who have not developed themselves with higher education, as things like resentment, rigid thinking, dipstick tribalism and, yes, bitterness.
Posted by gruver1
at April 17, 2008 08:01 AM
Posted by bb
at April 17, 2008 08:09 AM
Posted by alan
at April 17, 2008 08:48 AM
Posted by Fred Mounts
at April 17, 2008 08:53 AM
Posted by Rich S.
at April 17, 2008 09:03 AM
Posted by Josh Massey
at April 17, 2008 09:05 AM
comment #31
says ...PVice basically hit the nail on the head.
For those uninitiated with Mr. Springsteen's writing, suffice to say that remarkably few American artists of the past 25 years have addressed the notion of exploring the ideals that form the foundation of our country vs. the realities that individuals and our communities actually go through. His is as unique and fascinating an American vision as I've seen in my adult lifetime. Certainly his work has earned him the right to throw in his two cents on the election.
Somewhere up in this thread a couple people inquired about what Springsteen meant when he said that Obama has "the vision of America" that Springsteen has described in his music. I'd just say that the evidence of this is explicit in a majority of the records that Springsteen has released throughout his career, and that if you're interested you would undoubtedly discover those similiarities if you ever decided to give his work a listen or two.
Peace!
Posted by goodvibe61
at April 17, 2008 09:16 AM
Posted by SaveFarris
at April 17, 2008 09:19 AM
comment #33
says ...Digging the Brucelove from p.Vice and Goodvibe61.
Until 2004 Bruce's "vision" was always implicit rather than explicit--until finally he had enough. The Vote for Change move failed in terms of ousting Bush and to that extent I'm not sure why Springsteen felt compelled to throw his hat in the ring this time.
That said, he has been consistent in what he believes America can be, as others have already said here, and I think he's earned the right to say, "I think this guy can make it happen."
Can I paste a quote to prove it? Yeah, I can:
My father said "Son, we're lucky in this town,
It's a beautiful place to be born.
It just wraps its arms around you,
Nobody crowds you and nobody goes it alone
You know that flag flying over the courthouse
Means certain things are set in stone
Who we are, what we'll do and what we won't"
It's gonna be a long walk home...
Posted by DavidF
at April 17, 2008 09:26 AM
comment #34
says ...As someone who currently resides in the greater Philadelphia area, I'd have to say Wells' Alabama generalization is undeniably true.
Forget everyone inbetween Philly and Pittsburgh - I'm of the opinion anyone in the Pittsburgh area also has just as much of a rube-like inclination.
Shit, there are too many people in the Philadelphia area that fit this mold for my taste. I went to Penn State and it's a relatively small liberal college town of about 10 square miles, completedly surrounded for hundreds of miles in every direction by the most back-country weird ass bumpkin folk you're liable to meet anywhere in this country. Needless to say, you don't venture very far from town unless you have a really humorous reason for doing so.
There's just nothing out there but woods, mountains, farms, and the occasional Walmart.
Posted by bents75
at April 17, 2008 09:28 AM
comment #35
says ...The most prejudiced and closed-minded people are always the first to accuse others of being prejudiced and closed-minded.
Posted by Josh Massey
at April 17, 2008 09:37 AM
comment #36
says ...Robert Scheer attempts to counteract the view of Bay Area liberals as condescending snobs who think the flyovers are too stupid to understand their own interests:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/15/EDHF1060SL.DTL
Posted by Mgmax
at April 17, 2008 09:42 AM
Posted by Rich S.
at April 17, 2008 10:12 AM
comment #38
says ...It's time Jeff answers for his unflinching hatred for the common man. I can see the Digg headline now "LA blogger hates white people". That should get a nice run-up to the front page, no?
I'm sure Jeff will delete this quickly, but I might as well put it out there...
I may not know you personally, Jeff, but you can add me to the list of people who've written you off for good. Ask yourself, how many times has this happened in the past few years...how many people have you alienated? Do you think that's normal? Ever question the commonality in all of your shattered relationships?
You are a walking, talking contradiction. You call yourself liberal, but you hate the common man. You call yourself an environmentalist, yet you drive a CO2 producing beast from the stoneage because what it really comes down to is behaving however you like while convincing yourself you're a good and thoughtful person.
I can't really say if you're a good person in real life, but if your blog truly is a window to your soul then you're nothing but a bitter, narrow-minded , wannabe aristocrat. Bigot and hypocrite are adjectives that go without saying.
Those quotes you display at the top? They read like awkward entries in a yearbook from someone who didn't really like you but wanted to say something nice. Nearly everyone of them has a qualifier...it's very sad. Why are you so unhappy?
I used to recommend you as one of the most interesting and insightful places on the web...that stopped when you ceased being a journalist and became a whiner and gossip monger. Now this is just a place for you to rant and regurgitate your vile outlook on life.
For the past year or so there's been nothing compelling beyond my own sentimentality and the strength of your commenters that makes this site worth reading...these forces are not enough to overcome the repetitive, rote misery that now exists in everything you write.
Thanks for banning me, Jeff, and waking me up. I sincerely hope you start living and stop stewing in your little mousehole. You've become the underground man, the caricature that Dostoevsky invented 150 years ago. Congratulations.
Ciao.
Posted by rocco_d
at April 17, 2008 10:21 AM
Posted by christian
at April 17, 2008 10:37 AM
comment #40
says ...Meanwhile, back in the reel world, Dave Kehr and his followers take Tom O'Neil to task for daring to be a moron:
http://www.davekehr.com/
Posted by T. S. Idiot
at April 17, 2008 10:56 AM
comment #41
says ...O'Neil proved himself to be a genuine fool with his bizarro diss of SUNRISE. But then, a guy who puts TITANIC and PEGGY SUE GOT MARRIED in his top ten list might not get SUNRISE. Of course, Coppola would.
Posted by christian
at April 17, 2008 10:59 AM
comment #42
says ...Wells is right about the gun totting, Nascar loving people in the main. But it's not just in Pennsylvania. It's in my native Ohio, and here in suburban Phoenix. It's the "What's the matter with Kansas" phenomenon with powerless people or even middle class citizens voting against their own self-interest.
I have attended several Springsteen concerts, one in Pennsylvania, and even met the man briefly. But in 2008, Springsteen's music is irrelevant, especially to young people, and I find that the long, epic songs do not age well. Some songs like "Bad Lands" and "Promised Land" I still like very much, but they are exceptions.
I thought during the Kerry campaign he was inefficacious. Maybe that had more to do with Kerry. However, I think the real problem is that Springsteen did more playing than talking about issues.
I think if he buttressed "Promised land" with addressing the candidate and the issues, like he did on his website, that might be effective.
What Bruce needs to do is to rehearse his campaigning, if he is going to do any effectively, i.e., do some calculated, anecdotal rhetoric about Obama, and then launch into an impassioned song, like he does in his stage act.
The military is about to come apart at the seams from overwork in Iraq, and that will surely happen if some foreign power becomes aggressive. The subprime meltdown will cause a deep recession or worse. The dollar is worth less than it ever has. There is evidence of global warming, and a comity of nations who believe the truth of it. Oil is $110 a barrel, with a concomitant global food shortage that has real lifestyle consequences for the breadbasket of America and outward.
This all happened during a Republican watch. The emperor has no clothes. The wizard is a feckless, craven man behind a screen. America as we know it no longer exists. The neocons, mainstream conservatives and the Republican Party did this. Why this is not patently evident to both the dipsticks and educated people, I don't know.
I think neither Obama nor Mrs. Clinton have all the answers. However, the modus operandi of the country has to change, or people and events outside this country are going to mandate changes on us.
John McCain's idea to pander a gasoline tax cut to encourage us to buy more of the terrorist's resource does not herald progressive thinking.
Posted by Arizona Joe
at April 17, 2008 11:07 AM
Posted by Edward
at April 17, 2008 11:24 AM
comment #44
says ...Christian, if you couldn't see how my comment fit into this discussion, I'm not going to hold your hand and explain it to you.
Posted by Josh Massey
at April 17, 2008 11:48 AM
comment #45
says ..."But only on HE talkbacks do people say, "My God...you can't say that about Pennsylvania's working people!" "
I'm guessing that has more to do with the fact that, other than posting here, you only interact with people who have their head buried up Hollywood's ass and, thus, don't think there's anything wrong with being condescending towards people like that.
Posted by Richardson
at April 17, 2008 01:30 PM
comment #46
says ...Regarding the way that Mr. Springsteen's art reflects the ideals of Mr. Obama, one of the things that clicked to me was a performance Bruce gave a few years back.
You might remember it. It was about 10 days or so after the towers fell. It had been announced there was gonna be a benefit, put on by movie stars and rock stars, for the people directly devastated by the attacks. I remember thinking about the potential for this "event" to be a bunch of self serving garbage.
The evening of the show my family and a bunch of friends sat down to watch it. When the show started, there was no intro, no opening explanation of what the show was gonna be. All that happened was there was the black screen changing to a shot of the twin towers and the statue of liberty, then it cut to the darkened soundstage. The lights came up, and it was Springsteen, who performed this, which as I've watched the campaigns develop this winter I've thought is an excellent example of why Mr. Obama has sighted Mr. Springsteen on the campaign trail:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zld2cSIVUO4
The sense of utter loss, combined with the idea of a rebirth, or a rising up from the ashes. It was, is, and will continue to be a message that I believe we'll always hear from these two guys..
Posted by goodvibe61
at April 17, 2008 01:59 PM
Posted by christian
at April 17, 2008 02:07 PM
Posted by rr3333
at April 17, 2008 02:17 PM
Posted by Mgmax
at April 17, 2008 02:38 PM
Posted by Mgmax
at April 17, 2008 02:39 PM
comment #51
says ...Sobchak to Wells:
With some due respect, I'm fairly certain you missed my point. What I meant to do was point out the electoral difficulties faced by a group of people, (such as yourself and many "liberals") who have the attitude, "we really need to win over and gain the support and enthusiasm of people who are stupider and less sophisticated than we are....we've got to befriend the hayseeds!"
BTW,
Tracey Morgan also said "My name is Brian Fellows!" That doesn't make it true.
Posted by Walter Sobchak
at April 17, 2008 03:24 PM
comment #52
says ...So the inhabitants of Planet Burma Shave are dreaming of Bruce Springsteen running for Senate. Given Burma thought that the failure of Hudson Hawk was down to the end of the cold war, what will be the boss's policy on Iraq? To bombard Baghdad with DVDs of Striking Distance?
Posted by tommysunshine
at April 17, 2008 04:07 PM
comment #53
says ..."Raised in Alabama, so I'm pretty sure Jeff meant the "Mississippi" part of Pennsylvania!"
I think Ed Rendell described some of the rural areas as being like Alabama, probably where Gruver got that.
I like Springsteen, but not his music, I need a bigger visceral punch from rock music. His support isn't gonna do Obama any good, I mean seriously. In defense of 'regular guys', it's pretty hard to be smart in a country in which you have a media engaged in a relentless campaign to keep this country mired in stupidity. Last night's debate is example # 1,0034,401.
Posted by Titus Pullo
at April 17, 2008 04:23 PM
Posted by lawrence20086
at April 17, 2008 05:44 PM
Posted by Spicer
at April 17, 2008 09:50 PM
comment #56
says ...Sobchak says: "What I meant to do was point out the electoral difficulties faced by a group of people, (such as yourself and many "liberals") who have the attitude, "we really need to win over and gain the support and enthusiasm of people who are stupider and less sophisticated than we are....we've got to befriend the hayseeds!""
I think you've got Jeffrey all wrong. He doesn't want to win over or befriend the hayseeds. He wants the Democrats to repudiate the "bubbas" in the red states completely, at which point all the elitists in the blue states will feel proud that the Dems have finally spoken the truth about the racist droolers and get out there and win the election without any red-state help.
Posted by Jimmycrackcorn
at April 17, 2008 11:51 PM
comment #57
says ...Jimmycrackcorn, you're almost there. I don't have the time to find the post, but at one point, Wells was half-seriously advocating the secession of the "Blue States." He does not care a whit about the "regular guy." He wants to create some kind of progressive Democrat utopia with Obama as its god-emperor.
Posted by Rich S.
at April 18, 2008 05:26 AM
Posted by Josh
at April 18, 2008 07:54 AM
comment #59
says ...Spicer says ...
I am a moderate, a registered independent
Honestly, moderate? A moderate to what exactly? Is it because you dont have the stones to actually think for yourself and take a position?
Find me next time you're at Barnes and Noble the book "Best Moderates in American History"
Posted by Josh
at April 18, 2008 07:58 AM
Posted by Mgmax
at April 18, 2008 08:12 AM
Posted by bozance
at April 18, 2008 10:05 AM
Posted by bozance
at April 18, 2008 10:06 AM
Posted by bozance
at April 18, 2008 10:07 AM
Posted by bozance
at April 18, 2008 10:07 AM
Posted by bozance
at April 18, 2008 10:09 AM
comment #66
says ...Sorry to see you go, rocco. But I feel your pain.
And any voter who would go from Nader to McCain is not one who has a real clue. Even "moderate" Dems who would for McCain and keep the disastrous GOP policies in motion are operating under some whacked priorities.
Posted by christian
at April 18, 2008 12:52 PM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)