July 2
July 3
July 4
Diminished Capacity
Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson
We are Together
July 9
July 11
August
Eight Miles High
Journey to the Center of the Earth
Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
July 18
A Very British Gangster
Before I Forget
Felon
Lou Reed's Berlin
Transsiberian
July 22
July 23




Posted by Jeffrey Wells on May 19, 2008 at 07:37 AM
Posted by diesel
at May 19, 2008 09:06 AM
Posted by breadlymoore
at May 19, 2008 09:09 AM
comment #3
says ...I was just thinking that critics are full of it, when they argue that the 80s was a more culturally stifling decade to cinema, compared to the 90s. No one would have funded "Blade Runner", "Blue Velvet", or the "The Last Temptation of Christ" in the 90s, I can tell you that. Any sci-fi which didn't look as dumb as "Soldier" or "The Fifth Element" would have been "unmarketable"; "Blue Velvet" would be considered politically incorrect; and movie chains would refuse to handle any movie with Jesus in the marquee. If Spielberg tried to do films like "Empire of the Sun" and "The Color Purple" in the 90s, they'd be ghettoized to HBO.
Posted by D.Z.
at May 19, 2008 09:25 AM
comment #4
says ...Oh, and the teaser for Oklahoma, er Australia, is up at http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2008/0-9ABC/Australia/trailer.php
Posted by D.Z.
at May 19, 2008 09:31 AM
comment #5
says ...I'm really trying to see what inspired that, and I just don't see a connection. Interesting though, D. MANHUNTER, THE STUNT MAN and ATLANTIC CITY would be other good examples of what you're talking about.
At the same time, the indie and foreign film explosion in the '90s really did at least begin to balance the scales. Plus NATURAL BORN KILLERS and ROMEO IS BLEEDING, two of the craziest things I've ever seen, I recall fondly in the cinemas of the early '90s. And your lumping FIFTH ELEMENT in with SOLDIER just makes me really sad.
Posted by BurmaShave
at May 19, 2008 09:35 AM
comment #6
says ...Wells to Deisel: Hmmm...why is that, do you think? Could it be because there's tons of stuff to do each day (screenings, interviews, press conferences, late evening parties) and the time for posting is limited? When I'm home in LA I mainly just sit there and write all day, with occasional time-outs for midday interviews or what-have-you. Then I go to screenings in the evening. Sometimes...and sometimes not.
Posted by gruver1
at May 19, 2008 09:47 AM
comment #7
says ...I'm beginning to think that premiering a film as big as Indy at Cannes was a bad idea. Once that bridge was crossed, it seems like everyone lost interest. Once the critics found out that the internet buzz was off and they didn't have anything to savage, it was like all the air was let out of the balloon.
I'm still looking forward to hearing about the Che biopics, but as for the rest, eh.
Posted by Rich S.
at May 19, 2008 09:59 AM
Posted by T. S. Idiot
at May 19, 2008 10:14 AM
comment #9
says ...My god, those shirts on Redford and Pollack! Especially that shirt on Redford opening towards the navel with that gold chain. No wonder the older gentleman looks mildly shocked.
Redford and Pollack look like the inspiration for Steven Martin and Dan Ayckroyd's Wild and Crazy Guys routine. Looking for French foxes . . .
Posted by nemo
at May 19, 2008 10:33 AM
Posted by T. S. Idiot
at May 19, 2008 11:01 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)