Discland
edited by Jonathan Doyle
Mafioso (The Criterion Collection, 3.18.2008) Nino Badalamenti is a supervisor in a car manufacturing plant who hasn't taken a vacation in over two years. On his way out the door to visit his beloved childhood hometown of Sicily -- with his blonde wife and daughters -- Nino is handed a package by his boss and asked to deliver it to a powerful and influential Sicilian gangster named Don Vincenzo. Once in Sicily, Nino has a hoot seeing friends and family, but his wife has trouble fitting in and is unfairly dismissed as a snob by Nino's family. Even more worrisome, Nino finds himself entangled in an intricate web of secret mafioso dealings and is eventually sent on an unexpectedly... elaborate errand. (continued)

Upcoming


July 2

Hancock

July 3

The Whackness

July 4

Diminished Capacity

Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson

Holding Trevor

Kabluey

We are Together

July 9

Full Battle Rattle

July 11

A Man Named Pearl

August

Eight Miles High

Garden Party

Harold

Hellboy II: The Golden Army

Journey to the Center of the Earth

Meet Dave

Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired

The Stone Angel

July 18

A Very British Gangster

Before I Forget

The Dark Knight

The Doorman

Felon

Lou Reed's Berlin

Mad Detective

Mamma Mia!

Space Chimps

Take

Transsiberian

July 22

Two Tickets to Paradise

July 23

Boy A




 

Real Reason

So the Daily Mail's Baz Bamigboye went to the Vanity Fair party at the Hotel du Cap last Saturday night, and learned from an "executive" that Vicky Cristina Barcelona costar Scarlett Johansson didn't make it to Cannes because of "scheduling issues," as Woody Allen put it the other day in a press confernce, but because she was being an ego-monster in terms of perks. She demanded an out-of-town villa ("way out in the sticks, some 25 to 30 miles away") and insisted on a 5,000 euro-per-day makeup consultant, Bamigboye reports.

Two Lovers<< previous | next >>Bush Swat

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on May 20, 2008 at 06:01 AM

comment #1

erniesouchak [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

If she'd insisted on acting lessons, I hope they would've relented.

Posted by erniesouchak [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 07:19 AM

comment #2

Jimmycrackcorn [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Have you heard Scarlett's new album of Tom Waits songs? Hoo boy.

Posted by Jimmycrackcorn [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 08:26 AM

comment #3

Wrecktum [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Hey, I like the Scarlett Waits video.

Also, never conflate a star's "demands" with their actual needs. How many times has a manager or agent made crazy, unreasonable demands simply because they know they can get them?

Of course, I'm a Scarlett apologist, so you can ignore me.

Posted by Wrecktum [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 10:00 AM

comment #4

Krazy Eyes [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

While you can certainly argue that the concept of ScarJo covering Tom Waits was a woefully misguided idea to begin with, the actual album is a lot better than it had any right to be. She may not have a good voice (though I find her husky voice fairly unique) or even much chops in the singing department but that's never held Waits back. It could have been *a lot* worse and you have to respect her for not doing a straight up pop album which would have been a disaster.

I think she's also do well with some sultry old-school burlesque-style tunes.

Posted by Krazy Eyes [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 10:18 AM

comment #5

Richardson [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

"While you can certainly argue that the concept of ScarJo covering Tom Waits was a woefully misguided idea to begin with, the actual album is a lot better than it had any right to be."

You know, once you get kicked in the balls once, the later hits don't hurt so bad. So one might say that getting kicked in the balls multiple times is better than it has any right to be, because it doesn't hurt as exponentially as it should based on how much the first kick hurts.

... Come to think of it, even by those standards, this album is still not better than it has a right to be.

Posted by Richardson [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 12:38 PM

comment #6

Ogami Itto [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

You know, once you get kicked in the balls once, the later hits don't hurt so bad. So one might say that getting kicked in the balls multiple times is better than it has any right to be, because it doesn't hurt as exponentially as it should based on how much the first kick hurts.

Eloquently expressed, sir.

So is Scarlett a worse singer or actor?

Posted by Ogami Itto [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 01:08 PM

comment #7

Rich S. [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

My favorite crazy star demand was Van Halen's venue contract that specified that their dressing room was to have a bowl of M&M's with all the brown ones removed. When asked why, I think David Lee Roth explained, "because brown M&M's are bullsh*t. You eat M&M's for the flavor, the crunch and the color. It's like brown M&Ms have a clear shell. You get cheated out of 1/3 the experience!"

Years later, Roth explained the real reason. It was to insure that the venue had actually read the contract. They didn't really want the M&Ms removed; it was enough if the venue reps just asked, "do you really want us to do that?"

That doesn't sound like ScarJo's problem, though.

Posted by Rich S. [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 01:23 PM

comment #8

bfm [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

The articles also says that it's a sparkling return to form for Woody. So is anything in it credible?

Posted by bfm [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 02:56 PM

comment #9

fielding [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

Actually, bfm, if you actually relied on more than just Wells' columns for info, you'd know that Vicky Cristina Barcelona will probably end up being the best-received film at Cannes. By the way, Jeff, when you were mentioning the scattered boos you heard at the end of the screening of VCB, why didn't you also mention the huge STANDING OVATION it got?

Posted by fielding [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 20, 2008 05:10 PM

comment #10

nemo [TypeKey Profile Page] says ...

"Years later, Roth explained the real reason. It was to insure that the venue had actually read the contract. They didn't really want the M&Ms removed; it was enough if the venue reps just asked, "do you really want us to do that?""

Very clever! I heard a similar story about John McCarthy, a computer science pioneer at Stanford who was famous for never reading any doctoral thesis by his students. To test this, one of his students put in the middle of his thesis a paragraph reading: "50 bucks if you read this, John." McCarthy never collected.

Posted by nemo [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2008 08:07 AM

Post a Comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?