Another brilliant, perfectly-cut video piece from Jamie Stuart, and a good quote to go with it: "I've never been a big fan of 'movie lighting' (where exactly does rim light come from anyway?), although some filmmakers do it in a way that works for me.

"Movie lighting -- and, by extension, photography lighting -- came about, in part, because film stocks in the past weren't fast enough to shoot in low light levels. At the dawn of the medium, electric lights weren't even bright enough, so the filmmakers created roofless sets that the sun could illuminate.
"Eventually, cameramen started to stylize their lighting and created a whole slew of affectations; it was exceedingly rare to see light fall in movies as it actually does in real life. Eventually, film stocks improved and filmmakers took their cameras out into the world from studios. Things changed."
Here's the location of the original article.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on May 2, 2008 at 11:12 AM
comment #1
lazarus
says ...
Pretty liberal use of the word "brilliant". Well shot, well cut, but it ain't exactly Wong Kar-Wai.
Posted by lazarus
at May 2, 2008 12:14 PM
comment #2
nemo
says ...
What he leaves out is the fact that most real-life lighting is pretty ugly and boring. Another reason for all the lighting "affectations" in photography and movies -- it just plain looks better.
Posted by nemo
at May 2, 2008 12:47 PM
comment #3
mutinyco
says ...
The quotes were from this: http://www.wonderlandstream.com/stream_blog.aspx?blog_id=415
Posted by mutinyco
at May 2, 2008 12:49 PM
comment #4
Mgmax, le Corbeau
says ...
Yeah, without rim lighting people look like they're pasted onto the wallpaper behind them.
Posted by Mgmax, le Corbeau
at May 2, 2008 2:42 PM
comment #5
nemo
says ...
All the lighting tricks of 20th century movies and photography can be found in Renaissance painting. Even lighting as striking and mannered as film noir. This guy just doesn't know his art history.
Posted by nemo
at May 2, 2008 5:47 PM