Upcoming
March 12
The Exploding Girl
SuicideGirls Must Die!
Tapes from the Script
March 17
Once More...
A friend I just spoke to was under the impression I was half-and-half on WALL*E. Not in the least, I said. I'm an unamibiguous admirer top to bottom and start to finish. It's a masterpiece of its type. It's going to win the Best Animated Feature Oscar. I understand the impulse on the part of director Andrew Stanton to call it a robot love story and leave it at that, but it's a lie, of course -- a disinforming of pig-trough moviegoers who might think twice about going to a "green" movie that satirizes their lie-around, fat-ass lifestyle.
The plan seems to be working because WALL*E is going to make a lot of money this weekend. Between $52 and $57 million, according to Fantasy Moguls' Steve Mason.
A sweet, amusing and reasonably profound save-the-earth parable, WALL*E's reliance on 85% visual, mostly dialogue-free storytelling (which makes it a kind of silent film) recalls the artistry of Charles Chaplin, Harry Langdon, Jacques Tati and other others whose style of performance art has been dormant for so many decades. It lives again.
Of course, not everyone is going to understand how good this film is. A woman who saw it with me said to a young publicist on the way out, "It's nice but I was bored." So beware -- some are going to say it's not...whatever, snappily entertaining enough according to current popcorn-munching standards. Anyone who says this, trust me, is a plebe and a moron in terms of their cinematic taste buds.
Six months into 2008 and WALL*E is one of the two or three best so far, if not the best of the year. It's a major film and an occasion for enormous pride on Pixar's part.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on June 26, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Essentials
comment #1
Unison
says ...
For all I know Wall-E is amazing, but there's also a new Miyazaki film coming this year, so the Oscar could possibly be lost.
Posted by Unison
at June 26, 2008 12:31 PM
comment #2
aquaon23rd
says ...
I think the words "sweet" and "amusing" give the impression of a pretty good--not good or great--movie
Posted by aquaon23rd
at June 26, 2008 12:33 PM
comment #3
Alan Cerny
says ...
"It's a masterpiece of its type."
I'm glad you said it, I've been telling people that for the past two weeks and getting funny looks. But I hold to it regardless. I loved WALL*E.
Posted by Alan Cerny
at June 26, 2008 12:44 PM
comment #4
swhitty
says ...
A beautiful, beautiful movie -- and I wasn't knocked out by "Ratatouille," and was really underwhelmed by "Cars." Great work, Pixar.
Except what does it say about Hollywood that the year's best movie romance is a cartoon about a guy who looks like a forklift and a gal who looks like an Ikea trashcan?
Posted by swhitty
at June 26, 2008 12:56 PM
comment #5
mjn
says ...
Over at Phil Villareal is currently being excoriated for posting the sole "rotten" rating for WALL-E.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/wall_e/comments.php?reviewid=1737210
Posted by mjn
at June 26, 2008 1:09 PM
comment #6
LauraReeling
says ...
I appreciated the message of WALL*E but thought the movie began to seriously drag once WALL*E left Earth. Too many missed opportunities for Pixar's wonderful wit and visual gags. And will someone please explain how photosynthesis could occur in a refrigerator that had been shut for 700 years? And if John's hand touching Mary's was such a revelation to those two, where did all those babies on board come from?
Posted by LauraReeling
at June 26, 2008 1:26 PM
comment #7
le corbeau
says ...
We need a drinking game based on how long Wells can write thoughtfully about Wall-E before he starts slamming fatasses again.
Posted by le corbeau
at June 26, 2008 1:34 PM
comment #8
Chris Willman
says ...
So these two things are certain: (1) Wall-E will, like most Pixar movies, be one of the two or three best-reviewed films of the year. (2) Its chances of being nominated for a best picture Oscar will, again, be zero.
Posted by Chris Willman
at June 26, 2008 1:56 PM
comment #9
Terry McCarty
says ...
Chris Willman wrote:
So these two things are certain: (1) Wall-E will, like most Pixar movies, be one of the two or three best-reviewed films of the year. (2) Its chances of being nominated for a best picture Oscar will, again, be zero.
I'm going to guess otherwise on (2).
Given Disney booster Charles Solomon's recent resurfacing today in THE LOS ANGELES TIMES to condemn Ralph Bakshi, it wouldn't surprise me to see Solomon write copious priase of WALL-E between now and the announcement of Oscar nominations.
Posted by Terry McCarty
at June 26, 2008 2:16 PM
comment #10
arentin
says ...
Great post nice info, thank you for post it
Cerita Campur Aduk Arentin
Posted by arentin
at February 1, 2010 12:26 AM
comment #11
Valentinus
says ...
Given Disney booster Charles Solomon's recent resurfacing today buy generic levitra to condemn levitra bayer Ralph Bakshi
Posted by Valentinus
at February 6, 2010 2:44 AM
comment #12
davehogan78
says ...
I like this sweet, amusing and reasonably profound save-the-earth parable, WALL*E's reliance on 85% visual, mostly dialogue-free storytelling .. The Data Recovery Company
Posted by davehogan78
at February 11, 2010 1:26 PM
comment #13
davehogan78
says ...
I purchased the DVD yesterday. This is already the 4th time I watched this great show.. :)
Harlan Kilstein
Posted by davehogan78
at March 15, 2010 11:32 AM
Post a comment