So 20th Century Fox chief Tom Rothman has hosted 16 episodes of "Fox Legacy,"the Fox Movie Channel show, and there are no YouTube clips to embed? Today's N.Y. Times story by Brooks Barnes reports that Rothman "has developed a cult following for his historical monologues and self-deprecating style. He gets fan mail -- no less a viewer than Steven Spielberg recently dropped him a note -- and more episodes are on order."
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on July 7, 2008 at 10:12 AM
comment #1
FilmTurtle
says ...
Never heard of the show. But it's worth asking, if he's the host of a show called "Fox Legacy," why he's allowing the Fox Research Library to be shut down. The entire history of the studio is contained there. So much for the Fox "legacy." Argh...
Posted by FilmTurtle
at July 7, 2008 10:45 AM
comment #2
le corbeau
says ...
I'd love to watch this, if DirecTV didn't put FMC on a higher tier than all the other movie channels. It's no TCM, but it has some good things (if you get it, be sure to tivo Blood Money or Zoo in Budapest).
Posted by le corbeau
at July 7, 2008 10:47 AM
comment #3
MikeSchaeferSF
says ...
Mgmax: Comcast does the same thing -- I have a movie-centric tier that includes several dozen film channels including multiple Starz, multiple Encore, IFC, Sundance... but no FMC.
Posted by MikeSchaeferSF
at July 7, 2008 10:56 AM
comment #4
lesterg
says ...
Fox Movies, Hallmark and Sundance are inexplicably buried between Latin music channels, foreign language stations and obscure MTV spin-offs (Tr3s, VH1 Soul) on Connecticut's Cablevision. Can't imagine what their viewership must be around here.
Posted by lesterg
at July 7, 2008 11:18 AM
comment #5
Edward
says ...
One thing about cable and satellite that is annoying, at the very least, are all the channels you receive that you have no interest in. For me it would be the Hispanic channels (for obvious reasons), shopping and religious programming (although, I have to confess of watching religious programming on occasion), MTV, Disney, etc. The providers bitch about not being supportive of a la carte programming, but viewers should be allowed to pick and choose a block of programming that's of interest. What's the point in having 100's of channels when you only are interested in half of them.
Posted by Edward
at July 7, 2008 12:26 PM
comment #6
erniesouchak
says ...
I'm sure it's a really, really, REALLY big deal for Papa Steven to drop a note to a studio head. (yawn)
Posted by erniesouchak
at July 7, 2008 12:34 PM
comment #7
Rothchild
says ...
Tom Rothman is a soulless piece of shit. He's also retarded. He's like the exec version of D.Z.
Posted by Rothchild
at July 7, 2008 1:42 PM
comment #8
The Bandsaw Vigilante
says ...
His crimes while head of the studio are legion (forcing Bryan Singer off X-MEN 3, driving Connery into retirement, nearly making Proyas quit the filmmaking business altogether, et al).
But he, like, totally gets to fuck the star of SUSPIRIA, like, every night!
Dude even said so himself at the Saturn Awards.
Posted by The Bandsaw Vigilante
at July 7, 2008 1:55 PM
comment #9
Rothchild
says ...
You're not even touching the shit he pulls on writers.
Posted by Rothchild
at July 7, 2008 2:18 PM
comment #10
Richardson
says ...
"I'd love to watch this, if DirecTV didn't put FMC on a higher tier than all the other movie channels. It's no TCM, but it has some good things"
I don't know if they still do it, but I have caught them outright misframing "letterboxed" presentations. If 'Miller's Crossing' is on, chances are good I'll wind up watching it. I caught a good chunk of it on FMC, and was briefly pleasantly surprised to see it letterboxed -- most movie stations don't bother. But it soon appeared that this was by far the worst shot Coen brothers movie ever, badly misframed, until I checked it opposite my DVD and realized that they had done something wrong. I think they took an open matte copy and just applied the frame across it without checking or something, because the framing was awful. In a movie where hats are so important, the tops of people's heads matter.
Ever since then I've been wary of FMC, though I should say in their favor that they have also shown widescreen Robert Altman movies that *did* look properly aligned.
Posted by Richardson
at July 7, 2008 2:29 PM
comment #11
The Bandsaw Vigilante
says ...
"You're not even touching the shit he pulls on writers."
Quoted for truth.
Posted by The Bandsaw Vigilante
at July 7, 2008 3:46 PM
comment #12
le corbeau
says ...
Yeah, FMC is very indiscriminate about what prints they show. The virtue they have is that once in a blue moon one of those really good early Fox talkies, that you cannot see anywhere, turns up. Blood Money is astonishing, there's a real S&M angle to it that is quite shocking. Zoo in Budapest is a lovely allegory about teens in love and zoo animals in cages, really a beautiful film in that early 30s way that no other decade equals (silent poetry plus early talkie realism). There are a few others-- The Power and the Glory (Preston Sturges' proto-Citizen Kane), some of the better Will Rogers titles, etc.
Posted by le corbeau
at July 7, 2008 7:55 PM
comment #13
lipranzer
says ...
Rothman comes off as very pompous in the intros he does. I was particularly not happy with the one he did for GENTLEMAN'S AGREEMENT - while he understood the film wouldn't play the same way today it obviously did back then, he still came off as if he were lecturing us.
Posted by lipranzer
at July 7, 2008 9:51 PM
comment #14
T. S. Idiot
says ...
Zoo in Budapest is one of the most beautifully photographed, by Lee Garmes, films of the early 30s and deserving of Criterion treatment.
Posted by T. S. Idiot
at July 8, 2008 8:50 AM