Discland
edited by Jonathan Doyle
Cloverfield [BLU-RAY] (Paramount Home Entertainment, 6.3.2008) Disguised under deliberately goofy, yet deliciously edible-sounding, aliases such as Cheese and Slusho, Matt Reeves' Cloverfield was produced and rushed into theaters under an equally appetizing shroud of secrecy. From last year's incredibly elusive Super Bowl ad to the film's viral marketing campaign, Cloverfield had everybody scratching their heads and drooling in anticipation. Aside from the as-yet untitled title and the Blair Witch-ian visual style, the film's biggest appeal was the enigmatic creature who was last (un)seen hurling the decapitated head of the Statue of Liberty onto the crowded streets of New York City. All we knew about the mysterious beast was that it was big and angry. Now that the highy-anticipated project has come and gone, one question has fortunately been answered: Cloverfield was a major success. (continued)

Upcoming

November 12

Slumdog Millionaire

November 14

A Christmas Tale

B.O.H.I.C.A.

Dostana

The Dukes

Eden

House of the Sleeping Beauties

How About You

Quantum of Solace

We are Wizards

November 21

The Betrayal

Bolt

Special

Twilight

November 30

Badland








Self-Hypnosis

All is well in Vicky Cristina Barcelona (Weinstein Co., 8.15) when Penelope Cruz's neurotic firecracker is on-screen and having her way, and particularly when she's arguing with Javier Bardem's compulsive seducer-slash-painter. These two provide the erotic blood-flow in this Woody Allen film, and thank the Movie Gods for that. VCB is certainly worth seeing for Cruz and Bardem alone, but if the film had been entirely about them I would have been 100% delighted.


As is, VCB is about a couple of American girls -- Vicky (Rebecca Hall) and Cristina (Scarlett Johansson) -- getting romantically involved with Bardem (and to a lesser extent Cruz) during a summer in Barcelona, and the hard fact is that Johansson and Hall are nowhere near as interesting as their Spanish-born costars.

And yet Vicky Cristina Barcelona played better at Monday's night's premiere screening in Westwood than it did for me in Cannes, and I'm trying to figure out why.

One reason had to do with mere suggestion, I suppose. The crowd at Westwood's Village theatre laughed heartily at just about every joke and visual inference, and the press people in the Grand Palais last May were much more subdued. Another persuader was the fact that I read David Denby's review of Allen's film just before the Village screening, and an observation of his had a surprising effect.

One of my beefs against Vicky Cristina Barcelona when I reviewed it on 5.16.08 was the incessant narration. I described it as "persistent, obnoxious and thoroughly unwanted" and said that it made "this story of overlapping, off-and-on love affairs in present-day Barcelona so on-the-nose and over-explained that I was feeling actively hostile less than 15 minutes in."


Denby, however, wrote the following: "Allen uses a narrator (Christopher Evan Welch) to explain who the women are, and, at first, it seems as if the director is just filling in backstory and telling us things we might have noticed ourselves. But this narrator does for Allen what narrators once did for Francois Truffaut -- he allows him to skip merely functional exposition and jump from highlight to highlight."

Truffaut! A light went on. Or rather, I found myself gradually succumbing to a cousin of the movie lover's "Russian Tea Room syndrome." Legendary critic Andrew Sarris described this back in the '80s as a willingness to not only accept but applaud speed-bumpy things in a foreign-language film (precious-sounding dialogue, say, or a clumsily-composed narrative) that an American viewer might reject outright if included in an English-language film, and especially a Hollywood-produced one.

An hour or so after finishing the Denby review (which I read while sitting at Jerry's Deli), the lights came down at the Village and I began watching Vicky Cristina Barcelona with the idea that it was, in fact, a French-language Truffaut film, and it played like a whole different animal. Not painful, not prickly. Not first-rate but a mostly agreeable thing.

I still preferred Cruz and Bardem's scenes to everything else, but the narration didn't get on my nerves because it was now the narration in Truffaut's Two English Girls or The Woman Next Door,and that was okay.


It still felt as if Allen was faintly mocking his own writing style and penchant for having his characters forever going to musuems, chatting in cafes and talking about artistic longings...aaah, I'm blathering. My basic point is that it played better the second time so do what you will. Odds are you'll have a pretty good time with it.

Of course, if you're under-25 you won't go at all because GenY audiences, to go by the box-ofice track record of Allen films over the last eight or ten years, are averse to the Allen sensibility.

I want to repeat one complaint from last May, which is Allen's no-naked-breast- shot rule. "He's telling a story that's swimming in mad erotic currents," I wrote, "and yet he's clearly decided against boob exposure -- not even a casual random glimpse. It's obviously unnatural and un-European. Presumably this was about avoiding an R rating, but the oddly prudish vibe works against the story and the general mood, so why even pick up the brush if you're afraid to paint a nipple?"

Count On It<< previous | next >>Carr Tube

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on August 6, 2008 at 8:54 AM

comment #1

berg says ...

I thought Rebecca Hall's character of Vicky reminded me of Mary Wilkie from Manhattan, there was a sense of "I'm from Philadelphia, we don't do things like that in Philadelphia" about her ... compare the breast shots in Truffaut's The Man Who Loved Women with the ones in Blake Edwards' remake. They trimmed the sex scenes in Man on Wire for the PG-13 release ...

Posted by berg at August 6, 2008 12:40 PM

comment #2

T. S. Idiot says ...

Penny C's boobs are on display in Elegy.

Posted by T. S. Idiot at August 6, 2008 12:41 PM

comment #3

snoop says ...

I agree with your general statement, but I'm under 25 and absolutely love Allen. That being said, Allen is pretty much a wait for DVD guy. His films are intimate, and (Match Point being an exception) I usually prefer to view them in an intimate setting. However, I say this having not been of age for many of his greatest films, so if I had been, I might think differently. I probably will when I'm in my 40s and I'm still one of the few people turning up every time for Wes Anderson and PTA.

Posted by snoop at August 6, 2008 1:07 PM

comment #4

p.Vice says ...

I'm right there with you Jeff -- my basic movie rating scale is as follows:

Boobies - THUMBS UP!

No Boobies - THUMBS DOWN!

I believe Roger Ebert uses this scale as well.

Posted by p.Vice at August 6, 2008 1:56 PM

comment #5

anti-sardine says ...

p.Vice, I thought that your basic movie rating scale was:

Films I loathed beyond reason - THUMBS DOWN!

Films I disliked or hated - THUMBS UP!

Posted by anti-sardine at August 6, 2008 2:46 PM

comment #6

Gaydos says ...

A movie that says here the choice you face in young adulthood: A) follow the rules even if you find that you probably will lose your shot at joy or B) search for authenticity in life/love even if it means bumping into walls and risking a couple of gunshots from maniac ex's and assorted loons along the way.

So of course, VCB is comfortably tucked into my list of top 3 films for the year so far.

Posted by Gaydos at August 6, 2008 2:54 PM

comment #7

EOTW says ...

Javier Bardem. Studly. Period.

Posted by EOTW at August 6, 2008 5:54 PM

comment #8

Terry McCarty says ...

snoop wrote:
I agree with your general statement, but I'm under 25 and absolutely love Allen. That being said, Allen is pretty much a wait for DVD guy. His films are intimate, and (Match Point being an exception) I usually prefer to view them in an intimate setting.

MANHATTAN, one of Woody's rare ventures into widescreen, is well worth seeing in a theater.

Posted by Terry McCarty at August 8, 2008 12:04 AM

Post a comment