Young Stiffs

Achtung -- Spoiler Warning!: New York critic David Edelstein today described the documentary Dear Zachary as "another dead-child saga, among the most enraging I've ever seen, and while it's fine and heartfelt and I commend it to those of you with strong constitutions, it is the film that has finally broken me. Folks, I can't take this anymore. I know children suffer and die in this cruel world; I know we can never be too vigilant on their behalf. But the number of movies [with this theme] is simply disproportionate.

"Come awards season, dead children seem to factor in every other prestige picture, immeasurably ratcheting up their emotional stakes. In the past weeks, we've had Rachel Getting Married (which earns its anguish), Changeling (which doesn't), I've Loved You So Long (a psychological striptease with a cheat ending), The Boy in the Striped Pajamas (dead children plus the Holocaust); and, as I write, I see on my desk a DVD of this year's Israeli drama My Father, My Lord -- six-sevenths of which is subtle and poetic, until the boy protagonist ventures into the surf while his strict Orthodox rabbi father is too busy davening to look up."

Pile On<< previous | next >>Hathaway Bird Flip

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on October 31, 2008 at 11:55 AM

comment #1

Sabina E Author Profile Page says ...

of course. People always love a good tear-jerker film. as long as it's not over the top.

Posted by Sabina E Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 12:25 PM

comment #2

Edward Havens Author Profile Page says ...

IIRC, Dear Zachary is not a dead child saga but a dead parent saga. The child's not even born yet when the tragic occurrence which drives the narrative happens.

Posted by Edward Havens Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 12:28 PM

comment #3

Kim Voynar Author Profile Page says ...


It's also a dead-child film at the end, although Edelstein rather spoils that for people who haven't seen it and don't know what happens.

Posted by Kim Voynar Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 12:41 PM

comment #4

arteye Author Profile Page says ...

There's probably no human drama more engulfing and life-changing than a child's death. Our family finds it difficult to watch these "dead-child" movies because we have first-hand experience. Once you start filtering out "dead-child" titles the catalog of choices gets pretty thin.

Posted by arteye Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 1:00 PM

comment #5

bmcintire Author Profile Page says ...

Well, fuck. Not that there should be a spoiler dividing line between fiction and documentary, but that just sucks. The trailer tried its best to keep that little fact hidden, so my thanks to fucking crybaby David Edelstein for letting this particular cat out of the bag.

Posted by bmcintire Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 1:14 PM

comment #6

Drew Author Profile Page says ...

Jeff, take this item down, or rename it and add some MOTHERFUCKING SPOILER WARNINGS.

Jesus Christ, the arrogance of this... on your part and Edelstein's. Do you know how hard the filmmakers worked in the publicity materials and trailers to keep one particular narrative turn quiet? It's pretty much the cornerstone of their campaign. "What happens next, no one could believe..." And yet it's your headline, and it's Edelstein's key thesis to his rant.

You must truly hate your audience and/or this movie to sabotage it so thoroughly. Shame on you.

Posted by Drew Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 1:42 PM

comment #7

Edward Havens Author Profile Page says ...

Well, see... I didn't know the ending. I haven't seen the film yet. So there we are. Spoiled again.

Posted by Edward Havens Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 1:59 PM

comment #8

EricDSnider Author Profile Page says ...

Agreed -- that's a terrible spoiler to throw out there. Edelstein shouldn't have done it, and Wells shouldn't have repeated it. The less you know about this film going in, the better.

Posted by EricDSnider Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 2:02 PM

comment #9

p.Vice Author Profile Page says ...

Edelstein has long been a pussy but I'm surprised to see him wear it so openly on his sleeve. Let's hope by "broken" he means he'll never write another review again.

Posted by p.Vice Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 2:07 PM

comment #10

crsryan Author Profile Page says ...

If a filmmaker wants to pull the rug out from under us, I agree that as a critic its best to err on the side of not spoiling that, but this film is incredibly emotionally manipulative, and even moreso by setting itself up as something more straight-forward than it is. I'd like to see a documentary that scrutinized the makings of 'documentaries' like American Teen and Dear Zachary very closely.

Posted by crsryan Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 2:27 PM

comment #11

lonniechung Author Profile Page says ...

It never bothered me until I became a father a few years ago. The first time it bit me was Syriana - and that one hurt. Not the death as much as the awkward kid trying to fit in. Either way, I've grown an unanticipated thin skin when it comes to kids in movies. Once you these become realistic fears, it puts the whole idea of art into perspective. I have real anxiety now that can only be stoked by a movie like Snow Angels (which I was impressed by, none the less), but I no longer need that experience; it is better left unknown. And come on you fucking crybabies - enough with the spoiler alert stuff. The comment was essential to the article, not a cat-out-of-the-bag non sequitor.

Posted by lonniechung Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 2:50 PM

comment #12

lonniechung Author Profile Page says ...

man i need an editor

Posted by lonniechung Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 2:51 PM

comment #13

gruver1 Author Profile Page says ...

Wells to Drew: I haven't yet seen Dear Zachary yet, so I didn't know it was a spoiler. Oh, well, cat's out of the bag now! Okay, I'll put a spoiler warning up.

Posted by gruver1 Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 3:23 PM

comment #14

EricDSnider Author Profile Page says ...

And come on you fucking crybabies - enough with the spoiler alert stuff. The comment was essential to the article, not a cat-out-of-the-bag non sequitor.

Yes, it was essential to the article -- and the article itself was a spoiler. If Edelstein wanted to focus on that particular element of the film, he should have started by warning the reader that he was going to have to spoil part of the movie in order to make his point. Talking about a huge twist in a movie's plot that occurs in the second half and that has intentionally been kept hidden is unfair to the viewer.

Posted by EricDSnider Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 3:24 PM

comment #15

bmcintire Author Profile Page says ...

lonnie - How essential was Edelstein's crybaby article? Not at all. It served him in that he is able to flaunt the fact that he could talk (too much) about three films the general public by and large has not yet had an opportunity to see.

crsryan - Unless you've got documentation to back your claims up, I'm not buying it. The filmmaker set out to make one film, and time and fate turned it into something very much different. It may seem a bit manupulative to exploit this occurrence, but it was evidently no set-up on his part.

Posted by bmcintire Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 3:27 PM

comment #16

Glenn Kenny Author Profile Page says ...

I have nothing meaningful to say about the film, but would just like to throw my hat into the "David Edelstein is a pussy" ring, adding "hear, hear" and "you don't know the half of it."

Posted by Glenn Kenny Author Profile Page at October 31, 2008 4:42 PM

comment #17

D.Z. Author Profile Page says ...

"Folks, I can't take this anymore. I know children suffer and die in this cruel world; I know we can never be too vigilant on their behalf. But the number of movies [with this theme] is simply disproportionate."

Jeff should probably avoid Battle Royale.

Posted by D.Z. Author Profile Page at November 1, 2008 1:26 AM

comment #18

Erik Childress Author Profile Page says ...

And David Edelstein joins Lou Lumenick in the running for this year's Bag O' Douche winner. Dear Zachary wasn't made in hopes of awards (which can't be said of some of those other titles.) It started as a memorial and became a fight against Canada's justice system. Incidentally, if the film isn't on the shortlist for Best Documentary in a few weeks, and then nominated and then WINS the award this year, then that committee has less credibility than the ratings board. Completely unprofessional to spoil the film like that. What a little turd Edelstein is.

Posted by Erik Childress Author Profile Page at November 1, 2008 6:42 AM

comment #19

Howlingman Author Profile Page says ...

Remember way back when critics would help keep secrets in film? The twists, the turns? Remember the veil of secrecy around THE CRYING GAME and THE SIXTH SENSE? Remember when critics were so surprised or shocked or moved by a film they did their best to keep the secret in the bag, so the movie going public could experience what they experienced in that darkened theater?

Whatever happened to those guys?

Posted by Howlingman Author Profile Page at November 1, 2008 8:17 AM

comment #20

Hallick Author Profile Page says ...

"Whatever happened to those guys?"

They started competing with blogs and message boards and IMs and the like. They think the existence of the internet means there aren't any secrets anymore. Which is a fair assumption, save for the fact that one still needs the manners to preface their pieces with a warning for people who've managed to avoid the spoilers.

Posted by Hallick Author Profile Page at November 1, 2008 10:46 AM

comment #21

alatefy Author Profile Page says ...

Great post. Thank you. I visit this site العاب قص شعر | العاب | العاب بنات | العاب مكياج

Posted by alatefy Author Profile Page at November 27, 2010 8:18 AM

comment #22

janee Author Profile Page says ...

Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability disaster recovery

Posted by janee Author Profile Page at May 18, 2011 7:08 AM

comment #23

woing Author Profile Page says ...

Afghan officials say 7 people these louis vuitton handbags have been wiped out and eight other people wounded in the Taliban assault over a luxury motel in spite of the reality that in the capital, Kabul, Tuesday night.

The officials stated earlier Wednesday the figure do not consist of no much under 6 suicide lv sunglasses who both blew by themselves up or have been wiped out by safety forces. They cautioned the passing away toll could nevertheless rise.

Interior Ministry spokesman Siddiq Siddiqi declared the five-hour siege belonging for that Intercontinental motel over earlier Wednesday, saying Afghan safety autos and ambulances have been removing the lifeless and wounded in spite of the reality that in the building.

A spokesman for that NATO-led coalition in Afghanistan stated earlier two of its helicopters fired near to the lv shoes belonging for that motel in which three militants experienced used up positions, effectively eliminating them. The NATO operation arrived louis vuitton wallet to possess ended the standoff between the insurgents and safety forces.

Mickey Slaven, nine, said: 'It was brilliant, specifically when my trousers developed away from plastic material bin liners ripped in spite of the reality which i experienced been near to the catwalk.' Carl Beard, director of operations for that lab, lv belts there remains to be no launch of radioactive or hazardous components to the surroundings and there is no instant danger to local community safety, "even in these severe conditions, discount luxury goods in http://www.luxuryoline.com welcome to get them.

Posted by woing Author Profile Page at June 29, 2011 12:32 AM

Leave a comment