Youth in Revolt
January 15
January 22
Drool
The Girl on the Train
The AP's David Germain is reporting that "about 15 newspapers and several TV stations and cable channels" are refusing to run ads for Kevin Smith's Zack and Miri Make a Porno because they find the word "porno" objectionable. "Commercials for the film during Los Angeles Dodgers games on Fox Sports were dropped at the team's request," says Germain, "after some viewers complained."

If my six-year-old kid asked, "Dad, what's 'porno' mean?," I'd say "a porno is a dumb movie made by people with no talent who take their clothes off and roll around and make noises." Simple.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on October 15, 2008 at 1:30 PM
comment #1
actionman
says ...
Stupid puritanical belief systems still at large in the U.S. Very weak. IT'S A F'ING MOVIE!
Posted by actionman
at October 15, 2008 1:40 PM
comment #2
bildeaux
says ...
Daddy, what does WAR mean?
Posted by bildeaux
at October 15, 2008 1:42 PM
comment #3
MikeSchaeferSF
says ...
And yet I saw an absolutely hideous promo for yet another VH-1 bitches-and-hos hip-hop "reality" show the other day, and it was shown right in the middle of... SpongeBob SquarePants!
Posted by MikeSchaeferSF
at October 15, 2008 1:46 PM
comment #4
televisiontears
says ...
If my six year old kid asked me, "Dad, what's 'porno' mean?", I'd say "Pornos are awesome movies made by stupid people with no talent that helped Mommy and me love each other long enough to make you and your sister. And when Mommy doesn't "love" Daddy anymore, Daddy can watch one and feel much better." Simple.
Posted by televisiontears
at October 15, 2008 1:48 PM
comment #5
lazespud
says ...
I'd always assumed that they made the title with assumption that some conservative outlets would refuse the advertising, then they'd get a resulting bunch of free advertising because of this on places like HE, and for those original outlets they'd resubmit the ads as simply "zack and miri".
It just seemed like they'd titled the movie with the assumption that it could be cut down if certain outlets complained...
By the way, I saw my first commercial for it last night and when they said "Miri", I thought they'd made a mistake. No matter how many times I've read the title, I dyslexically saw "Mira" and not "Miri".
And what kind of a name is "Miri" anyway?
Posted by lazespud
at October 15, 2008 1:51 PM
comment #6
p.Vice
says ...
I'd say it takes more talent to be in a porno than it does to be in a Kevin Smith movie.
Posted by p.Vice
at October 15, 2008 1:51 PM
comment #7
MikeSchaeferSF
says ...
And while we're at it... Major League Baseball has been promoting Viagra for years -- Viagra is (or was) "an official sponsor", fer chrissakes. Now all of a sudden sex makes baseball teams like the Dodgers uncomfortable?
Posted by MikeSchaeferSF
at October 15, 2008 1:58 PM
comment #8
corey3rd
says ...
Porno is something daddy did because he's hung like a horse and worshipped in Brazil. I still love your mommy although sometimes its nice when mommy gets a little help with some of her friends.
Posted by corey3rd
at October 15, 2008 2:00 PM
comment #9
televisiontears
says ...
p.Vice - George Carlin, Chris Rock, Ben Affleck, Matt Damon, Alan Rickman, and yes, Seth Rogen.
I'm not the biggest Kevin Smith fan, but I'll never understand the insane levels of hate some have for him. He's probably the least pretentious big name filmmaker out there, and he makes the films he wants. You like them or you don't. It's not as if he's destroying American culture with his micro-sized productions.
Posted by televisiontears
at October 15, 2008 2:04 PM
comment #10
bluefugue
says ...
Elizabeth Banks looks pretty hot in that billboard.
Posted by bluefugue
at October 15, 2008 2:32 PM
comment #11
Aris P
says ...
Miri = Star Trek Episode 12, 1967.
Posted by Aris P
at October 15, 2008 2:40 PM
comment #12
Cadavra
says ...
It could also be short for Miriam.
Posted by Cadavra
at October 15, 2008 2:55 PM
comment #13
Mark
says ...
Actually Kevin Smith demanded that ads be removed from MLB games. He needed the press that comes with controversy.
Posted by Mark
at October 15, 2008 2:59 PM
comment #14
RDP
says ...
So we haven't really evolved as a country at all in the twenty five years since my local newspaper wouldn't accept ads for the James Bond movie "Octopussy".
Posted by RDP
at October 15, 2008 3:03 PM
comment #15
Gordie Lachance
says ...
This sort of reminds me of the Janet Jackson SuperBowl thing a few years back.
As a guy, watching the game with your kids, you're SUPPOSED to oogle the cheerleaders with your son, and say "Look at her pom-poms", you know, to make sure your kids not a fag or anything, but GOD FORBID you see an almost bare metallic-covered tit, and it's the end of the world.
Am I supposed to be turned on by breasts? Morally outraged? It's no wonder Viagra / Cialis were the 2 biggest Superbowl ad buyers. We're all a bunch of confused nervous limp dicks.
Posted by Gordie Lachance
at October 15, 2008 3:14 PM
comment #16
Mark
says ...
I'll attempt to rationalize the insane levels of hate for Kevin Smith. He hasn't made anything watchable since the second act of Chasing Amy. Yet he can fill out any film-school auditorium, rehash old inside stories, and everyone laughs nonstop like he's Chris fuckin Rock.
So there's definitely a playa-hating aspect to this. Great casts + endless green lights + fawning blowjobs + unwatchable movies = insane hate.
In the end, his ability to make whatever movie he wants is undeserved.
Posted by Mark
at October 15, 2008 3:21 PM
comment #17
Gordie Lachance
says ...
I'm going to see one of those "Evening Withs" in North Jersey in a couple of months. He's a great speaker, and if there were any other filmmakers who could tell a story like him, they'd be doing it (because it pays well). But there aren't, and they don't.
His ability to make movies is governed largely by his ability to sell (and re-sell) special edition dvds. Maybe if guys like Woody Allen or the Coen brothers would get off their asses and record a simple dvd commentary track, they wouldn't have to go to England to get funding.
Posted by Gordie Lachance
at October 15, 2008 5:02 PM
comment #18
Rev. Slappy
says ...
Bluefugue: I'm with you. It's amazing how much that stick figure looks like Banks.
Posted by Rev. Slappy
at October 15, 2008 5:39 PM
comment #19
Nick Rogers
says ...
If you're a dad watching a Dodgers game with your young son, you have to explain the word "suck," so why not "porno"?
Posted by Nick Rogers
at October 15, 2008 5:42 PM
comment #20
D.Z.
says ...
They hate to use the word porno in an ad for a movie title, but don't mind mentioning it in ads for Jerry Springer and Jenny Jones episodes? Hell, if it bothers them that much, why did they advertise "Freddy Got Fingered" or "South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut"?
Posted by D.Z.
at October 15, 2008 8:23 PM
comment #21
DavidF
says ...
Surely there are many academics making careers out of the messed up American dichotomy where 1/2 the country freaks out if they see Janet Jackson's tit or sees the word "porno" while the other half produces most of the world's pornos and wants to see as many tits as they can.
Your whole country needs to go on Dr. Phil.
Posted by DavidF
at October 16, 2008 6:45 AM
comment #22
dinther
says ...
It's not the word "porno" they should ashamed of, it's "Kevin Smith."
Television tears, the problem with Smith - other than his movies - is that he disses as "pretentious" other serious filmmakers who take chances and aspire to make ambitious films, but has made his career off of safe, point-and-shoot comedies that, if anyone dislikes them, he says, "don't take it so seriously."
Smith is a coward - afraid to try anything beyond shake-n-bake films because if he tried something ambitious, he couldn't pull it off.
Posted by dinther
at October 16, 2008 10:45 AM
comment #23
televisiontears
says ...
dinther, I agree he coudn't pull off anything with ambition, but I wouldn't say he's a coward, only that he's a filmmaker of very limited range. I guess my original point is that his films are so inconsequential, that it seems like overkill to express such disdain for him. It only gives his cult ammo to label him as misunderstood.
It's comparable to reactions to Wes Anderson films. Some people love every one of them like their mothers, which leads people who don't particularly enjoy them to inflate that disinterest into utter contempt. Then the Anderson fans need to overcompensate, and sometimes become apologists.
Posted by televisiontears
at October 16, 2008 11:57 AM
comment #24
storymark
says ...
And here we have, in Mark and dinther, two key examples of Smith haters - guys who really, really, really wish they could do what he did - and are pissed because they know they never will.
Posted by storymark
at October 16, 2008 1:04 PM
comment #25
DavidF
says ...
What storymark said.
I've never heard Kevin Smith call another film "pretentious."
I don't think there's anyone more aware of his limitations (which I think he has exceeded over the years) than Kevin Smith.
Go up to his face, tell him he makes the same movie over and over and has no style and he'll smile and agree. Then try it with Paul Thomas Anderson.
I happen to like most of what he does (though I wish he'd go a bit outside the box - I was really hoping he'd get to do Fletch) but, as televisiontears says, I don't understand the point in hating him unless (as Storymark says) you're a bitter clerk who thinks you coulda done what he did and fuck him for being succcesful.
Posted by DavidF
at October 16, 2008 1:44 PM
comment #26
lazespud
says ...
DavidF says:
"Go up to his face, tell him he makes the same movie over and over and has no style and he'll smile and agree. Then try it with Paul Thomas Anderson."
What... what? PTA acquired this rep of making "the same film" based on two movie; Boogie Nights and Magnolia, which definitely shared a altman-type structure. But Hard Eight, Punch Drunk Love, and There Will Be Blood are as different as different can be.
My favorite quote along these lines was when a critic accused Angus Young of AC/DC recycling his music for each album:
"I get really pissed off when people say I’ve recorded the same album twelve times. In fact, I’ve recorded the same album THIRTEEN times!”
Posted by lazespud
at October 16, 2008 2:12 PM
comment #27
dinther
says ...
Televisiontears, I see your point; my disdain from Smith emerges less from his work product, and more from his derision of those who, unlike him, aspire to do something big.
And Storymark, you gave me the giggles --thanks for that. Yes, I suppose if I aspired to make movies of the caliber of Smith, I would first need a giant chip on my shoulder.
Posted by dinther
at October 16, 2008 7:16 PM
Post a comment