In a Rachel Abramowitz/L.A. Times interview that ran yesterday, Revolutionary Road director Sam Mendes asserted that April Wheeler, played by Kate Winslet in the film, "is one of the great feminist heroines. She's the only person in the movie [who's] big enough to face the truth.

"You know well this is not a movie about a woman who wants to go to Paris," Mendes says. "It's a movie about a woman who wants her life back and can still remember the dreams she once had and is finally waking up, which a lot of people do in their 30s and 40s, who go, 'How did I get here? This is not what I wanted. But I never made the decision, this all happened in increments -- I had a child and I had to compromise and I had to do this and that and suddenly I've lost my way. Now I'm just like everyone else and I thought I was special.'"
April's lament is the secret (or not-so-secret) inner story of, I would guess, at least 85% or 90% of the U.S. populace right now. Probably a much smaller percentage back in the conformist '50s, I'm guessing. I'm also guessing that people of the present are sensing that Revolutionary Road is pushing a certain spiritual reckoning (i.e., the failure to live up to early dreams and ideals) that they'd rather not consider, especially with the continuing economic tremors out there. Hell, the collapse of the temple.
It used to be that people accepted their unexceptional but comfortable middle-classness. But ever since the '70s (i.e., the Me Decade), the goal of across-the-board self-fulfillment -- creative, professional, spiritual, sexual, economic -- has been the standard, and very few have measured up.
A lot of people have money and good jobs (or had, I should say), although the general sense of social instability out there is profound right now. (The one bright light is the prospect of gradual betterment offered by Barack Obama.) A decent percentage probably feel they're at least somewhat sexually satisfied (i.e., looking/hoping/in the game) and have a spiritual life that works for them to some extent.
But most people, I suspect, feel creatively unfulfilled to a large degree. In some cases not at all. And many feel, like April, that the main reason for this is that they caved in to conventional jobs and mass-market comforts too many times in their 20s and early 30s. Most people are probably semi-okay with this, or are telling themselves that they have a reasonably fulfilling life, but they don't want to be nagged about any failures of spirit.
I have many shortcomings and weaknesses, but I didn't cop out with a conventional job and go, as Al Pacino's detective put it in Heat, for a "regular-type life." And this may be one reason why Revolutionary Road works for me -- why, in fact, I think it's a near-great film. Because it's saying what I believe to be the real truth about middle-class conventional values, and about the general sense of diminishment that is always the dividend when you opt for safety above all. For me, "normal" has always been a four-letter word.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on December 15, 2008 at 6:18 AM
comment #1
erniesouchak
says ...
Regardless of whether the film works, reducing the Wheelers' conundrum to a choice between safety and fulfillment is a bit of an oversimplification. We all make decisions based on what feels right to us at a given time, and assuming we grow, as we grow, some of those choices come back to haunt us. On another note, I don't think anyone will come out of the movie seeing April as a feminist heroine because she isn't given enough dimension in the script. I was more often annoyed by the character and found her remote. I doubt anyone finished the book thinking of her as a feminist, either (I suspect Yates would've hated the thought), but at least the book gave us a sense of the unhappiness that pervaded her life before she met Frank.
Posted by erniesouchak
at December 15, 2008 7:56 AM
comment #2
joncro
says ...
I would bet that it's a lower percentage of the U.S. populace... maybe 60-70. Still a big chunk but not 90 percent.
I think a lot of people are happy enough with their jobs, cars, Playstations and whatever..... We grow up and learn that you can't have it all, and see that a lot of people who do have a lot are still screwed up, that the job we wished we had is unbearably stressful, whatever it is.
I haven't seen the movie but in the trailer, when he's talking about Paris, it made me laugh... Grow up a little and understand that some young people in Paris are probably wistfully wishing they could live in the Connecticut suburbs - people are so free there, not like here.
A great movie would have them move to Paris and hate it.
Posted by joncro
at December 15, 2008 7:56 AM
comment #3
vansmith
says ...
In the 50's coming out of the war, getting a wife and a house an kids was THE dream and once you were in it you probably realized it came with a sense of finality, thats why all the booze and smokes an affairs, the repression descended slowly and then all those marriages broke up in the 70's the me decade, now we have enough toys to keep us distracted from what dreams we may have and have'nt fulfilled.
Posted by vansmith
at December 15, 2008 8:15 AM
comment #4
Sabina E
says ...
happiness is an illusion anyway.
I dont think most Americans are ever really happy.
there's more to life than just having a good job, a pretty wife, and a nice house, but that's just my opinion, of course.
Posted by Sabina E
at December 15, 2008 8:16 AM
comment #5
btwnproductions
says ...
In the book, both characters are pretty dim bulbs. Turning April into a "feminist heroine" is a reductive cop-out. (Non-conformity didn't work out too well for Yates, either; he saw the trap in that, too, and was never at home anywhere.)
Posted by btwnproductions
at December 15, 2008 8:27 AM
comment #6
Bubyubb
says ...
1) Oh yeah, people accepted it back then and they're much more open and questioning now. That's why people drank so much more then, because they were HAPPY.
2) If Revolutionary Road really had balls it would have set it in the present day, instead of patting the audience on the head by setting it in the bad old 50s. More pandering from the maker of American Beauty.
Posted by Bubyubb
at December 15, 2008 8:57 AM
comment #7
DarthCorleone
says ...
There's no question I'm creatively unfulfilled and that it's going to be a major source of deathbed consternation (should I have a deathbed).
That said, if everyone gave into the lofty dreams of missed opportunities because the malaise of the path of least resistance was too much to handle, the wheels of society as we know it would grind to a halt fairly quickly. Many realize correctly that there does come a point at which compromises must be made to at least some degree. There also comes a point at which many correctly accept that they simply don't have the talent to fulfill that creative itch. Sometimes the trick is recognizing the pipe dream from the viable possibility and coming to peace with that distinction.
Posted by DarthCorleone
at December 15, 2008 9:40 AM
comment #8
YRG
says ...
To me, this is a comedy. I plan to see it and laugh.
I hope that someday we will look back on overly dramatic pieces like this and see them much like we now see the earnest commercials of the 50s-- as relics of a past long gone. The way this is being marketed-- I cannot identify with either character... too much yelling and shouting... too melodramatic. The cinematography is nice, though, and there are moments when Leo DiCaprio reminds me of Ray Liotta.
Posted by YRG
at December 15, 2008 9:48 AM
comment #9
AlgonquinRed
says ...
I see it as a comedy too, YRG.
The simplistic message that unless you've oh-so-wisely devoted your life to the creation of a respectable but middle-of-the-road movie blog site, or the creation of respectable but middle-of-the-road, overly-burnished Hollywood dramas (Mendes), you're wasting your life.
Posted by AlgonquinRed
at December 15, 2008 10:18 AM
comment #10
btwnproductions
says ...
I would add that it's best to embark upon these adventures in the self before acquiring a family. But we're not always gifted with the necessary foresight and introspection to do so.
Posted by btwnproductions
at December 15, 2008 10:29 AM
comment #11
Ethan
says ...
Is it too late for Sam Mendes to go back and insert "Once in a Lifetime" by Talking Heads over the end credits?
Posted by Ethan
at December 15, 2008 10:33 AM
comment #12
Gordie Lachance
says ...
Belloc
How could they set this story in the present day, when that would negate the 2 main points of the story? (ie. in the 50's, once you're pregnant, your life's over, and, if you don't conform to all the little polite social lies we all live with, you're condemned to a mental institution).
I never saw this story as being about creative unfulfillment. It's about never being able to know anyone else, or even yourself. The Paris thing was about getting away from all the stupid, empty, vapid drones in this country who are content with a night out at Applebees and a sit-com. It's still a better option in that regard.
Posted by Gordie Lachance
at December 15, 2008 10:46 AM
comment #13
Bubyubb
says ...
"How could they set this story in the present day, when that would negate the 2 main points of the story? (ie. in the 50's, once you're pregnant, your life's over, and, if you don't conform to all the little polite social lies we all live with, you're condemned to a mental institution)."
By taking the core of what it's about-- dissatisfaction with marriage, materialism, middle age-- and updating it. So it really gets under our skins by hitting us where we live, instead of letting us think that we're so much more self-realized than our parents or grandparents.
People will still be talking about the Fight Club rant about duvets, long after this is forgotten, in other words.
Posted by Bubyubb
at December 15, 2008 12:33 PM
comment #14
Bubyubb
says ...
"The one bright light is the prospect of gradual betterment offered by Barack Obama."
And Christ, if you think any of the stuff this is REALLY about has jack all to do with what politicians do, you're crazy. Tell me how the auto bailout is going to satisfy the dreams of lost youth. Tell me how universal health care is going to make your spouse understand you better. Jesus H. Christmas Tree.
Posted by Bubyubb
at December 15, 2008 12:35 PM
comment #15
Jay T.
says ...
"If Revolutionary Road really had balls it would have set it in the present day, instead of patting the audience on the head by setting it in the bad old 50s. More pandering from the maker of American Beauty."
I guess you're a believer in the "author doesn't exist" theory. He based the move on the fucking book - don't be ridiculous.
Posted by Jay T.
at December 15, 2008 12:41 PM
comment #16
Bubyubb
says ...
I'm so sorry, I didn't realize that.
Pretty impressive of Shakespeare to write Romeo and Juliet about Puerto Rican gangs in New York City, too.
Posted by Bubyubb
at December 15, 2008 1:01 PM
comment #17
jhollywood56
says ...
Finally just saw it last night. The big thing that stuck out to me was that it seemed too short. Like a middle portion of it was missing. Haven't read the book so I can't compare but, yeah, liked it. Wanted more.
Posted by jhollywood56
at December 15, 2008 2:13 PM
comment #18
MattyC
says ...
BL:
How must it feel to be so awesome?
I bet it feels pretty good.
R+J has been performed/filmed/seen probably more than any other piece of literature, so a reimagining nearly 400 years after its debut is hardly comparable.
Look for a Revolutionary Road more suitable to your modern sensibilities in 2408.
Posted by MattyC
at December 15, 2008 2:56 PM
comment #19
Bubyubb
says ...
MattyC, remind me which statute sets out exactly how old a piece has to be before you can change where it's set.
My point, which is plain enough, is that if you didn't want it to be a nostalgia piece which allows the audience to feel they don't share the characters' dilemmas but they belong safely to the past, then update the surface details and keep the central drama that really matters, which is surely as relevant to lives in 2008 as in 1958. An adaptation that says your world of surfing the web and inner city loft living and HDTV is empty would have been a lot ballsier than one that says your parents' world of suburbia and station wagons was.
Posted by Bubyubb
at December 15, 2008 7:00 PM
comment #20
TonyR
says ...
A comfortable environment where you can meet singles who understand that love has a language that transcends race.
***************INTERRACIALLOVING.COM*************** is an exclusive online community designed to help diversely ethnic singles meet new friends, make great dates, and build lasting interracial relationships. Meet like minded singles who are looking to date outside their race.
You are just seconds away from taking that first step towards the life you have been longing for. So sign up for your free profile now.
Posted by TonyR
at December 15, 2008 8:54 PM
comment #21
janee
says ...
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability network
Posted by janee
at May 19, 2011 4:44 AM