Most Wanted
Email here for additions & corrections.

Ishtar
(May, 1987)
The Seven-Per-Cent Solution (OOP)
(Ross, 1976)
The Devils
(Russell, 1974)
The Pirates of Penzance
(Papp/Leach, 1983)
The Fortune
(Nichols, 1975)
-30-
(Webb, 1959)
Betrayal
(Jones, 1983)
Play It As It Lays
(Perry, 1972)
The Outfit
(Flynn, 1973)
Alex in Wonderland
(Mazursky, 1969)
The Legend of Lylah Clare
(Aldrich, 1968)
In The Cool of the Day
(Stevens, 1963)
That Cold Day in the Park
(Altman, 1969)
Thumb Trippin'
(Masters, 1972)
Midas Run
(Kjellin, 1969)
At Long Last Love
(Bogdanovich, 1973)
Brewster McCloud
(Altman, 1972)
Outcast of the Islands
(Reed, 1951)

Reader Submissions

1930's-1950's
The Moon's Our Home
(Seiter, 1936)
Sh! The Octopus
(McGann, 1937)
The Mating Season
(Leisen, 1951)
Bad for Each Other
(Rapper, 1953)
The Phenix City Story
(Karlson, 1955)
Run of the Arrow
(Fuller, 1956)
House of Secrets
(Green, 1956)
Saint Joan
(Preminger, 1957)
Macabre
(Castle, 1958)
The Fiend Who Walked the West
(G. Douglas, 1958
Five Gates to Hell
(Clavell, 1959)
1960's
Key Witness
(Karlson, 1960)
Summer and Smoke
(Glenville, 1961)
The Chapman Report
(Cukor,1962)
Bachelor Flat
(Tashlin, 1962) [on Hulu]
The L Shaped Room
(Forbes, 1963)
The Chalk Garden
(Neame, 1964)
A Thousand Clowns
(Coe, 1965)
You're a Big Boy Now
(Coppola, 1966)
The Whisperers
(Forbes, 1967)
Dark of the Sun
(Cardiff, 1968)
Skidoo
(Preminger, 1968)
Last Summer
(Perry, 1969)
The Comic
(C. Reiner, 1969)
1970-1974
The Revolutionary
(Williams, 1970)
The Landlord
(Ashby, 1970)
Diary of a Mad Housewife
(Perry, 1970)
Tropic of Cancer
(Strick, 1970)
I Never Sang for My Father
(Cates, 1970)
Sometimes a Great Notion
(Newman, 1971)
Marriage of a Young Stockbroker
(Turman, 1971)
The Music Lovers
(Russell, 1971)
Drive, He Said
(Nicholson, 1971)
The Steagle
(Sylbert, 1971)
The Last Movie
(Hopper, 1971)
Made For Each Other
(Bean, 1971)
The Day the Clown Cried
(Lewis, 1972)
Hickey & Boggs (OOP)
(Culp, 1972)
The Carey Treatment
(Edwards, 1972)
Pete 'n' Tillie
(Ritt, 1972)
Slither
(Zieff, 1973)
Man on a Swing
(Perry, 1974)
Open Season
(Collinson, 1974)
The Tamarind Seed
(Edwards, 1974)
Law and Disorder
(Passer, 1974)
Homebodies
(Yust, 1974)
Stardust
(Apted, 1974)
Celine and Julie Go Boating
(Rivette, 1974)
1975-1979
Rafferty and the Gold Dust Twins
(Richards, 1975
At Long Last Love
(Bogdanovich, 1975)
Hearts of the West
(Zieff, 1975)
Welcome to L.A.
(Rudolph, 1976)
W.C. Fields and Me
(Hiller, 1976)
Citizens Band
(Demme, 1977)
Twilight's Last Gleaming
(Aldrich, 1977)
Looking for Mr. Goodbar
(Brooks, 1977)
Girlfriends
(Weill, 1978)
Movie Movie
(Donen, 1978)
The Medusa Touch
(Gold, 1978)
American Hot Wax
(Mutrux, 1978)
Hot Stuff
(DeLuise, 1979)
Scavenger Hunt
(Schultz , 1979)
Players
(Harvey, 1979)
Rich Kids
(Young, 1979)
Nightwing
(Hiller, 1979)
Screams of a Winter's Night
(Wilson, 1979
When You Comin' Back Red Ryder?
(Katselas, 1979
1980's
Resurrection
(Petrie, 1980)
The Awakening
(Newell, 1980)
Simon
(Brickman, 1980)
God's Angry Man
(Herzog, 1980)
Fast-Walking
(Harris, 1982)
Twice Upon a Time
(Korty & Swenson, 1983)
Trouble in Mind
(Rudolph, 1985)
When the Wind Blows
(Murikami, 1986)
Housekeeping
(Forsyth, 1987)
The Glass Menagerie
(Newman, 1987)
Patty Hearst
(Schrader, 1988)
Drowning by Numbers
(Greenaway, 1988)
Haunted Summer
(Passer, 1988)
The Decline of Western Civilization Part II: The Metal Years
(Spheeris, 1988)
1990's
Old Times
(Curtis, 1991)
Prospero's Books
(Greenaway, 1991)
City of Hope
(Sayles, 1991)
The Baby of Macon
(Greenaway, 1993)
King of the Hill
(Soderbergh, 1993)
Dadetown
(Hexter, 1995)
SubUrbia
(Linklater, 1997)

Poison Tentacles

In one of his most stinging pans, Variety's Todd McCarthy has shown himself to be no jellyfish when it comes to zapping Gabriele Muccino and Will Smith's Seven Pounds.

Calling the 12.19 Sony release "an endlessly sentimental fable" that "aims at the heart at the expense of the head," being "unguided by rationality and intellect," he says it's considerably "off-putting for its manifest manipulations, as well as its pretentiousness and self-importance."

He also bitch-slaps Smith for embracing his character's "saintlike status...in a way so convincing that it proves disturbing as an indication of how highly this or any momentarily anointed superstar may regard himself."

The film "offers either seductive emotional appeal or indigestible mawkishness, according to taste. Along the way, there are references to a fatal vehicular accident, suggestions of [Smith's character's] deceptiveness and inscrutable imagery of a jellyfish which, you may be sure, all factor crucially in the denouement.

"Whether one entirely rejects the project's high-minded game-playing or falls right into the filmmakers' quasi-spiritual trap and is thereby helplessly reduced to a jellyfish-like state at the end, it's impossible to claim that Muccino and Nieporte lack the courage of their convictions, or faith in the moral value of their contrived little sacrificial fable."

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on December 17, 2008 at 2:24 PM

comment #1

CitizenKanedforChewingGum Author Profile Page says ...

I take it Wells didn't like it, then, as he's posting a negative review...

Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 2:56 PM

comment #2

Geoff Author Profile Page says ...

Oh yeah...that whole thing with the jellyfish.

Posted by Geoff Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 3:11 PM

Posted by Ray Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 6:38 PM

comment #4

Daniel Tayag Author Profile Page says ...

I hated, hated, hated, hated this film. And the jellyfish? UGH, I think I threw up a little in my mouth.

Posted by Daniel Tayag Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 6:39 PM

comment #5

Rod32303 Author Profile Page says ...

If the movie sucks, it sucks, but I've about had it with these MOVIE CRITICS talking about the self-importance of film actors taking roles in their choice of film...as if the films are a real depiciton of the actor. If the performance sucks, share why you weren't moved, not some psychoanalysis of the damn ACTOR. And what profession is more self aggrandizing than a fucking MOVIE CRITIC???

Also, the obvious Wells contempt for Smith is played out. WE GET IT, JEFF. Jesus. First Roberts, who doesn't mince words or kiss ass, then Murphy for some fucking reason, now Smith who just seems like a decent enough fellow with no legendary asstronics to, I guess, show he has flair or depth. Whatever. I am sure the film is tripe, but I am about to secretly hope it makes a trillion bucks just to enrage the fucking haters.

Posted by Rod32303 Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 7:05 PM

comment #6

dobbsy Author Profile Page says ...

Dare I ask for something resembling consistency from our critical and film fan brethren?

Consider this my Christmas wish:

Could we have two simple rules:

1) Don't slag a film for conventionality if you have just praised a ploddingly conventional film to high heavens.

2) Don't slag a film for being pretentious if you've sung the praises of a dozen unbearably pretentious films in the past year or so.

I know consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, but WTF people, WTF....

Posted by dobbsy Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 7:09 PM

comment #7

TVMCCA Author Profile Page says ...

Curious as to whether Smith and Muccino have any plans to remake Sidney Poitier's 1971 BROTHER JOHN--a contemporary Christ fable.

Posted by TVMCCA Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 7:45 PM

comment #8

ZayTonday Author Profile Page says ...

Will Smith plays the roles that he wants people to associate his own personality with. He wants you to think that this is actually him. He rewrites his roles and movies to show him in the best possible light and as the reviewer mentions, as a saint.

The whole thing is really getting old.

Posted by ZayTonday Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 8:51 PM

comment #9

EDouglasCS Author Profile Page says ...

And once again, Variety shits on the review embargoes the rest of us have to follow... probably DIGGed the review too because they know they're first and can do so. They really are a bunch of motherfuckers over there.

Posted by EDouglasCS Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 9:10 PM

comment #10

deadre Author Profile Page says ...

that embargo is asinine. it just makes the public think the movie is a dog, which it may or may not be. I'm glad there are finally some reviews before friday and if it's a dog, then public be warned. Otherwise all will follow the holy Will...blindly.

Personally, fingers crossed it makes less than anticipated... ...

Posted by deadre Author Profile Page at December 17, 2008 9:58 PM

comment #11

Daniel Tayag Author Profile Page says ...

I agree that the embargo is such bullshit. The movie is all over the torrents in DVD quality right now and they still want the embargoes to go on?

Posted by Daniel Tayag Author Profile Page at December 18, 2008 12:23 AM

comment #12

dobbsy Author Profile Page says ...

EDouglasCS, et al: Hollywood Reporter reviewed the movie online yesterday as well as Variety. For the record, THR's review by Kirk Honeycutt was a thumb's up.

Posted by dobbsy Author Profile Page at December 18, 2008 1:15 PM

comment #13

televisiontears Author Profile Page says ...

I had absolutely zero desire to see another Muccino/Smith manipulative trash bag, but this review from Portland's weekly made me think this might be a great film to have a cheap laugh on cable in a year. One of the funniest reviews I've read in quite a while. WARNING: Extremely spoiler heavy!

http://wweek.com/editorial/3506/11989/

Posted by televisiontears Author Profile Page at December 18, 2008 1:58 PM

comment #14

dobbsy Author Profile Page says ...

From Anne Thompson's blog:

"Scott Foundas's pan broke the review embargo in The Village Voice, followed swiftly by Todd McCarthy, whose review is only slightly less devastating..."

EDouglasCS: please share your thoughts about the motherfuckers at the Village Voice.

Posted by dobbsy Author Profile Page at December 18, 2008 6:18 PM

comment #15

John Cocktosten Author Profile Page says ...

This movie is horrifically awful. Don't even download it. It's hard to know where to start. I guess I could just say that I can't possibly understand how you could read the script and think it's a good idea to make it. I mean, you'd have to be an idiot or posess oceans of hubris.

Posted by John Cocktosten Author Profile Page at December 18, 2008 11:28 PM

Post a comment