HE reader Andrew Corks writes that he "saw Let The Right One In this year at the Tribeca Film Festival, where it took one of the top prizes, and was blown away by the overall quality of the film. It has an uncanny ability to successfully cross all genres -- horror, love story, comedy, coming-of-age -- combined with genuine acting and spectacular cinematography.
"Now that Let The Right One In has now picked up its second major critic's society award, why is it still absent from the Oscar Balloon and general Oscar talks?"
Wells to Corks: I'm not looking to put it down or exclude it from anything. It's one of the most unusual, originally conceived, genre-bending films I've seen in a long time. A really magnificent creep-out and a beautiful adolescent love story combined. I just didn't like it all that much. Or rather, I like having seen it but didn't like the way I felt as I watched it. I didn't care for the funny-looking girl who played the little vampire. I thought the little blonde boy was way too much of a candy-ass. I didn't like the low-rent fleurescent lighting, the constant snowstorms, the drab instiutional palette. I recognize without hesitation that it's an exceptional film. I'm just looking forward to the American remake.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on December 15, 2008 at 10:02 AM
comment #1
btwnproductions
says ...
It's a foreign-made horror movie, is why. I doubt even a quality English-language remake would generate Oscar buzz.
Posted by btwnproductions
at December 15, 2008 10:21 AM
comment #2
MikeSchaeferSF
says ...
It's one of my favorite films of the year, and I shudder to think what Mr. Cloverfield is going to do to it when he remakes it.
One curious thing about it: it takes place in the (late?) '70s -- there's a scene where a radio is playing and Brezhnev is mentioned -- and I'm not clear why (the setting is otherwise generic/Scandinavia). I'm guessing the remake will be contemporary.
Posted by MikeSchaeferSF
at December 15, 2008 10:57 AM
comment #3
EricDSnider
says ...
The only Oscar it could possibly have a shot at would be best foreign-language film, and Sweden didn't submit it. I agree it's a terrific movie, but it has little chance of gaining traction in any of the major Oscar categories, what with being foreign and a genre film and all.
Posted by EricDSnider
at December 15, 2008 11:12 AM
comment #4
Chase Kahn
says ...
"I recognize without hesitation that it's an exceptional film. I'm just looking forward to the American remake."
What? And I'm looking forward to Michael Bay's reimagining of THE BIRDS...
Posted by Chase Kahn
at December 15, 2008 11:17 AM
comment #5
CitizenKanedforChewingGum
says ...
Yeah, Jeff, those weird looking Swedish youngsters are a really valid reasons for not liking a foreign film.....what the hell? And didn't you just get done swearing off yet another crappy big-budget remake (TDTESS), yet you're salivating for this one? I just don't get you, man.
Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum
at December 15, 2008 11:25 AM
comment #6
hiviper
says ...
Probably one of the most original, well acted, expertly directed films this year, with a gorgeous soundtrack behind it all...and you can't wait for the American remake?
Yeah, we'll fix this one, just get some of those Cloverfield-quality actors in there and Twilight-it up more for the kids!
Posted by hiviper
at December 15, 2008 12:12 PM
comment #7
BurmaShave
says ...
Wells what does how you liked it have anything to do with its Oscar balloon status?
Posted by BurmaShave
at December 15, 2008 12:36 PM
comment #8
YRG
says ...
In the American remake, they will probably make the vampire a girl, and then it won't be much more than a male version of Twilight.
Posted by YRG
at December 15, 2008 1:13 PM
comment #9
Renfield
says ...
The fact that Wells called the character "a girl" means he didn't get the film at all.
Best film I've seen this year.
Posted by Renfield
at December 15, 2008 1:36 PM
comment #10
Howlingman
says ...
Why not? Vampires, plain and simple. And put me in the camp that freakin' loved it.
Posted by Howlingman
at December 15, 2008 1:52 PM
comment #11
Rothchild
says ...
"I recognize without hesitation that it's an exceptional film. I'm just looking forward to the American remake."
This will easily be the dumbest thing posted/written/typed on the internet today. I'd say no offense, but who am I kidding? This is the kind of thing you'd rail on, and maybe you should think about that. I really enjoyed Cloverfield, but I can't imagine another film in less of a need of a remake, and making them teenagers shows that Reeves missed the entire point. The film doesn't work once puberty kicks in. That changes the subtext, themes, structure, story, and character arcs. What do you have left? And the aesthetic look of the film, the fluorescent lighting, architecture, and constant snowfall, are part of what makes it great. And the kid being a candy-ass? It's about a Columbine type kid, right before he snaps.
There's nothing wrong with simply saying, "I didn't get it." But in a sense, that's what you did, in a roundabout way.
Posted by Rothchild
at December 15, 2008 2:02 PM
comment #12
hiviper
says ...
Renfield:
in all fairness, he called the actress a girl, not the character - but he's right, she should've been WAY hotter, and that little pansy blonde kid should've kicked some major ass in the end, much like a young Wells would've done.
Posted by hiviper
at December 15, 2008 2:06 PM
comment #13
Luke Y. Thompson
says ...
Mike-
it takes place in the (late?) '70s -- there's a scene where a radio is playing and Brezhnev is mentioned -- and I'm not clear why
I said the same thing in my review, and was sharply corrected by the publicist. It's the very early '80s.
The reason why is that the book it's based on was set then, and the title is based on a Smiths or Morrissey lyric from the time.
Posted by Luke Y. Thompson
at December 15, 2008 3:28 PM
comment #14
Ray
says ...
I loved this movie; it's definitely in my top ten for the year.
As for its Oscar chances, it doesn't have one. But it SHOULD be in the running ... it's that good. What a shame that, in the year the Academy finally acknowledges the rest of the world with the inclusion of Jackman as host, they continue to slight foreign films that are better than American product.
Sad.
Posted by Ray
at December 15, 2008 4:39 PM
comment #15
qwiggles
says ...
C'mon, Jeff: with that justification, you sound like one of the rubes you're always so hard on. Don't like the drab institutional palate or the snow? Why not relocate The Lives of Others to Palm Beach, while we're at it?
I don't, of course, mean to diminish the fact that you weren't crazy about it. Fine, different taste, whatever. But you make it sound like you're the kind of guy who has to turn Fanny & Alexander off because the snow is just too much to handle, and Alexander's refusal to take his stepfather out is too...effeminate.
Posted by qwiggles
at December 15, 2008 5:28 PM
comment #16
lipranzer
says ...
To me, this was like TELL NO ONE - very good when I saw it, albeit with some problems of pacing, and then it got better for me the more I thought about it. It's too bad Sweden didn't submit this as their official Oscar nominee (unless they thought it didn't have a chance and films like PAN'S LABYRINTH were an aberration) - not sure if it's going on my top 10, but it's definitely up there.
And I'm not looking forward to the remake either.
Posted by lipranzer
at December 15, 2008 7:58 PM
comment #17
TonyR
says ...
A comfortable environment where you can meet singles who understand that love has a language that transcends race.
************INTERRACIALLOVING.COM************* is an exclusive online community designed to help diversely ethnic singles meet new friends, make great dates, and build lasting interracial relationships. Meet like minded singles who are looking to date outside their race.
You are just seconds away from taking that first step towards the life you have been longing for. So sign up for your free profile now.
Posted by TonyR
at December 15, 2008 8:49 PM
comment #18
K. Bowen
says ...
There is an American film like it. It's called Carrie.
Posted by K. Bowen
at December 16, 2008 2:50 AM
comment #19
diesel
says ...
of course renfield thinks it was the best film of the year! if only they handed out free cockroaches at the movie.
Posted by diesel
at December 16, 2008 3:57 AM
comment #20
janee
says ...
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability system
Posted by janee
at May 19, 2011 4:49 AM