Youth in Revolt
January 15
January 22
Drool
The Girl on the Train
Last week Machine Project in Echo Park showed Daniel Martinco's "15-minute meticulously re-spliced creation in a never-ending loop that transforms a moment" from Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan "into one of anguish (or snickering for the the audience) into a meditation, maybe even a mantra. This below clip "doesn't begin to do justice to the size, sound and hypnotic power of the real thing." -- from an LA Weekly piece that appeared last Thursday.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on June 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM
comment #1
Wrecktem
says ...
More evidence that the Shat is a peerless legend.
Posted by Wrecktem
at June 2, 2009 9:42 AM
comment #2
frankbooth
says ...
My friends and I discovered, many years ago, that this moment -- pretty damned funny on its own -- is an absolute riot in slo-mo. Of course, alcohol consumption helps enhance the hilarity.
Impulse is still the Shat's greatest work, but this ranks up there. There's something perverse about Trekkies that they can watch this stuff with a straight face.
Posted by frankbooth
at June 2, 2009 10:21 AM
comment #3
BurmaShave
says ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5vlco4yvSc
My respectful submission for their next project.
Posted by BurmaShave
at June 2, 2009 10:27 AM
comment #4
DarthCorleone
says ...
Here's the thing about this moment...
Khan has just told Kirk that he's leaving them buried alive inside the Genesis planet, and he taunts him with this. The Enterprise is (supposedly) crippled and unable to retrieve them. So Kirk flips out and yells Khan's name in rage.
HOWEVER, the Enterprise is not crippled, and Kirk KNOWS that. He and Spock had revealed in the scene previous to this via coded language that "by the book" a rescue would take place in two hours. Khan thinks he's in control of the situation, but he absolutely is not. So what is Kirk getting so genuinely upset about? The officer who killed himself instead of shooting him? Surely he feels bad about that, but is it worth that mighty bellow?
Consequently, Shatner - so often lampooned for overacting in probably his most famous and most indulgent acting moment - is not the one doing the acting here. It's the character of Kirk! Or rather, it's Shatner acting out Kirk's overacting. James Tiberius Kirk is not an actor, and consequently any element of overacting here is more or less on par with Kirk's acting capabilities. Thus, Shatner has nailed the moment perfectly at another level.
I realize they probably didn't have that in mind when they shot the scene, but I find it an amusing element to consider that is never discussed.
Posted by DarthCorleone
at June 2, 2009 10:41 AM
comment #5
bluefugue
says ...
>There's something perverse about Trekkies that they can watch this stuff with a straight face.
Some of us just don't flee to irony quite as quickly. The "Khan" scream is overacting, but Shatner plays his character well enough in most cases. Not comparing Trek to Shakespeare, but the latter ain't subtle either -- and it works. (Branagh pulls out so many stops in his "Hamlet" that you think he might explode -- and the result is infinitely more mesmerizing than Gibson's lackluster take on the role.) Same with Twilight Zone or Singin' In The Rain or any number of other movies/shows that might seem alien to modern sensibilities. One sign of a flexible mind, IMO, is the ability to absorb various texts/styles/modes on their own terms without reflexively resorting to the derisive chuckle.
Posted by bluefugue
at June 2, 2009 11:16 AM
comment #6
Rich S.
says ...
You know, Darth, I never thought of it that way, but you're probably right. Your explanation reminds me of Wallace Shawn in The Princess Bride.
"But what Khan doesn't know, is that Kirk knows that Khan thinks the Enterprise is crippled, but Kirk knows that Khan doesn't know that it isn't. So when Khan taunts Kirk about the Enterprise being crippled, Kirk screams at Khan to make Khan think that Kirk doesn't know it's not."
And then Kirk says, "I developed an immunity to Iocaine powder."
Posted by Rich S.
at June 2, 2009 11:19 AM
comment #7
BurmaShave
says ...
Inconceivable!
Posted by BurmaShave
at June 2, 2009 11:23 AM
comment #8
p.Vice
says ...
That two minute bootleg is better than any feature I've seen in the last year and a half.
Posted by p.Vice
at June 2, 2009 12:04 PM
comment #9
Patrick Feerick
says ...
Love this Martin Arnold style stuff!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXgjugI-iFU
Posted by Patrick Feerick
at June 2, 2009 12:26 PM
comment #10
CitizenKanedforChewingGum
says ...
"One sign of a flexible mind, IMO, is the ability to absorb various texts/styles/modes on their own terms without reflexively resorting to the derisive chuckle."
Or perhaps the sign of a flexible mind is finding an equal amount of humor in various texts/styles/modes, and never stop chuckling.
That's also a lot more fun.
Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum
at June 2, 2009 12:33 PM
comment #11
DavidF
says ...
It's also worth noting how awesome Montalban is in this scene. So bitter and quiet about it.
Also hugely worth noting is that he shot all his stuff WEEKS before Shatner. They shot all the Reliant bridge stuff and then re-dresssed it as the Enterprise bridge so the interplay between the two - some of the best in Trek, most would acknowledge - is all the more remarkable.
(ALSO - a friend just told me, after randomly finding it on Amazon, that Nick Meyer, who is responsible for all the genius of the original cast films - has a book coming out in August.)
Posted by DavidF
at June 2, 2009 1:20 PM
comment #12
markj
says ...
God I hated that new Star Trek 'film'.
Posted by markj
at June 2, 2009 2:32 PM
comment #13
crazynine
says ...
That is awesome, except for one niggling detail they got wrong-- keeping the second "Khaaaaan!!!" in the sound loop, although each time in this cut Shatner only says it once.
Kinda ruins the "purity" of it all for me ;-)
Posted by crazynine
at June 2, 2009 3:12 PM
comment #14
LYT
says ...
Small correction...this LA Weekly piece ran A YEAR AGO, not last week. Check the year in the date.
Posted by LYT
at June 2, 2009 3:16 PM
comment #15
BurmaShave
says ...
markj, no you didn't. Seriously, just think about it, lose your prejudice, and relax. It's not a hatable film.
Posted by BurmaShave
at June 2, 2009 3:16 PM
comment #16
bryce_david
says ...
Not as good as the many Mommie Dearest clips on youtube, certainly when Diana Scarwid says "i'm not one of your faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaans" which is totally freaky/brilliant. It's at 1:30 at the following clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGkjmUsIFR0
Posted by bryce_david
at June 2, 2009 4:03 PM
comment #17
Ghost072
says ...
God I loved that new Star Trek 'film'.
Posted by Ghost072
at June 3, 2009 6:47 AM
comment #18
swag
says ...
Warhol's "Empire" was a better use of my time.
Posted by swag
at June 4, 2009 8:54 AM
Post a comment