Youth in Revolt
January 15
January 22
Drool
The Girl on the Train
This G.I. Joe spoof trailer gets down to the adolescent heart of the matter. The only bothersome thing is that it was posted three days ago.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on August 5, 2009 at 4:17 AM
comment #1
COCO
says ...
Toys for boyz.....this shows the beast for what it is....meh......popcorn anyone?
Posted by COCO
at August 5, 2009 4:36 AM
comment #2
actionman
says ...
very cool. i really enjoyed that.
Posted by actionman
at August 5, 2009 4:41 AM
comment #3
Todd
says ...
WOW this looks like a great movie after all. Why didn't they show this trailer instead?
Posted by Todd
at August 5, 2009 4:43 AM
comment #4
BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
says ...
That was great.
Toys are ace. I remember Steven Spielberg said something like how boys are all natural born filmmakers, because from a very young age they're framing badass cinematic shots in their eyes using their toys. It's quite correct.
Posted by BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
at August 5, 2009 5:27 AM
comment #5
BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
says ...
Another thing - those G.I. Joe toys have weirdly accurate faces. Times have changed since the Star Wars toys that made Luke Skywalker look like a gay bodybuilder.
Posted by BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
at August 5, 2009 5:36 AM
comment #6
CitizenKanedforChewingGum
says ...
In related news, the actual film G.I. Joe is sitting pretty at 91% over at RT. I know this is destined to come down to earth, and it's not being screened for critics, but I am choosing this to be the one big, dumb action movie of the summer that I'm going to catch (I don't really count Star Trek, although I'm sure many of you would).
I thought it looked like fun from the very first trailer.
Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum
at August 5, 2009 5:54 AM
comment #7
BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
says ...
I've softened my stance towards it. Initially I thought it looked like absolute dogshit but the more recent trailers and whatnot look okay. I just can't really be arsed to pay for it. I might catch a pre-12:00 $6 special at the AMC.
Posted by BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
at August 5, 2009 5:58 AM
comment #8
DavidF
says ...
Brilliant!!
By which I mean, "obvious and not that funny."
But points for effort.
I thought it looked horrible from the first trailer - I mean, the fundamental thing is that they're all UNIQUE, wearing their stupid outfits, not wrapping themselves in interchangeable accelerator suits.
Can we all agree that the "What do they accelerate?" exchange is the worst trailer moment since Jar Jar's "Yousa people gonna die?"
I expect it to suck. If it somehow doesn't...maybe I'll give it a shot down the road.
Posted by DavidF
at August 5, 2009 6:00 AM
comment #9
larry braverman
says ...
What's bothersome is the incorrect aspect ratio.
Any points for effort are negated.
Posted by larry braverman
at August 5, 2009 9:45 AM
comment #10
nemo
says ...
Dolls for boys.
Posted by nemo
at August 5, 2009 11:20 AM
comment #11
BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
says ...
So what if they are "dolls for boys"? They're clearly used in different ways. You seem to imply that it's a feminine trait to play with toy figures, yet I don't see many boys having tea parties with their G.I. Joes and changing their diapers.
Posted by BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey
at August 5, 2009 2:47 PM
Post a comment