Youth in Revolt
January 15
January 22
Drool
The Girl on the Train
In 1997, or some five or six years after the flop of Curly Sue and his retreat from Hollywood, the late John Hughes shared his concerns about the malignant effects of the film industry upon family and friends with female pen pal Alison Byrne Fields.
"John told me about why he left Hollywood just a few years earlier," Fields writes in an 8.6 blog post called "Sincerely, John Hughes." "He was terrified of the impact it was having on his sons. He was scared it was going to cause them to lose perspective on what was important and what happiness meant. And he told me a sad story about how, a big reason behind his decision to give it all up was that 'they' (Hollywood) had 'killed' his friend, John Candy, by greedily working him too hard."
In other words, Candy's death at age 43 from a heart attack and cardiac arrythmia wasn't, in Hughes' opinion, primarily due to his being severely overweight and having been a smoker most of his life. In fact, Hughes believed that Candy might well have survived if Hollywood hadn't maliciously forced him to constantly perform as the star of various movies, for which he was presumably well paid.
That's interesting. I never knew that. But this is what genius-level auteurs do -- they create their own worlds by investing in them whole-hog.
Candy's Wikipedia biography -- obviously suspect in the wake of Hughes' just-revealed opinion -- claims that the extremely bulky actor "had been making a significant effort to improve his health in the last year of his life, [having] recently quit smoking" and making progress at losing weight. "His family had a history of heart disease, and he had been warned by doctors several times before to reduce his weight, but Candy had trouble doing so."
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on August 7, 2009 at 6:58 AM
comment #1
Stringer Bell
says ...
I love John Candy, but it wasn't Hollywood's fault that he died young. He needed to lose LOTS of weight.
Judy Garland, on the other hand, while a boozer and pill popper, was run ragged by the Hollywood system of the time. Her family had a right to blame Hollywood for her death.
Posted by Stringer Bell
at August 7, 2009 7:25 AM
comment #2
DeafBrownTrashPunk
says ...
I read that blog post last night and was blown away. So that was why he suddenly quit filmmaking in 1991. I was also touched that he actually became pen pals with that blogger and even called her up one day many years later. Lucky gal.
Still in mourning.... RIP John Hughes
Posted by DeafBrownTrashPunk
at August 7, 2009 7:32 AM
comment #3
actionman
says ...
This is one of the best things I've ever read about Hollywood. If all of this pen-pal stuff is true, I have a new found respect for Hughes, a filmmaker I never connected with in the same way that a lot of other people clearly did.
My heart goes out to his family...just terrible.
I'll have to watch Ferris this weekend.
Posted by actionman
at August 7, 2009 7:45 AM
comment #4
corey3rd
says ...
amazing that Hughes wouldn't view John Candy's death as a reason why he needed to hit the gym and shed pounds. Peter Jackson did it. And if working hard in Hollywood will kill you, Michael Caine would have survived the 80s
While Hughes might have "left Hollywood" - he still contributed to the making of so many crappy films in the last two decades.
Posted by corey3rd
at August 7, 2009 7:51 AM
comment #5
Glenn Kenny
says ...
I had the privilege of hosting an SCTV panel in NYC a few years back, featuring Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, Joe Flaherty, Andrea Martin, and producer Andrew Alexander. I had put together a bunch of clips, and one was Candy's Johnyy LaRue exercise show, featuring the immortal "heart's beatin' like a rabbit" line. As the clip unspooled, I was horrified; it only hit me then how it tied in to his death. But nobody was offended; in fact it led to a long discussion about how there were no limits to where Candy would go, and how that applied to the SCTV troupe as a whole. Such is the paradox of the funny fat man. Of course there was more to Candy's persona than his girth; he really was prodigiously talented. But the girth was a big part of the persona. Which leads to the question of where you go when/if you shed it.
Posted by Glenn Kenny
at August 7, 2009 8:07 AM
comment #6
Jeffrey Wells
says ...
Wells to Glenn Kenny: Where does a fat comedian go if he slims down? I'll tell you where he goes. Into obscurity and the unemployment line! As Jonah Hill points out early in Funny People, you have to be fat to be funny. Even if a comedian's material is brilliant, the "funny" goes right out the window if the comedian looks healthy. You have to have that self-destructive wild-fat-man thing going on to be a big name. Hill has that part down cold. He looks about 30 or 40 pounds fatter than he was in Superbad, and boy, is he hilarious!
Posted by Jeffrey Wells
at August 7, 2009 8:19 AM
comment #7
DeafBrownTrashPunk
says ...
So true about being fat to be funny part.
This is almost true for female comediennes. Not trying to be "mean," but a lot of female stand up comics and comediennes aren't traditionally beautiful by society's standards of feminine beauty. A lot of stand up comics and comedians have said that they were bullied in their youths, so they used humor as a way to distract people from focusing on their obesity or looks.
Posted by DeafBrownTrashPunk
at August 7, 2009 8:28 AM
comment #8
Jeffrey Wells
says ...
Hello...? I was kidding! Was Lenny Bruce fat? Jerry Seinfeld? Mort Sahl? Richard Pryor, Woody Allen, Sarah Silverman, George Carlin, Eddie Murphy, Richard Lewis, Andy Kaufman, Robin Williams, Gilbert Gottfried, Albert Brooks, Chris Rock, Dick Gregory, David Brenner, Bill Cosby, etc.?
Posted by Jeffrey Wells
at August 7, 2009 8:54 AM
comment #9
Glenn Kenny
says ...
No, none of the comedians you cite were/are fat, true. Hence, they never made fat part of their schtick, as Candy did. As I said, Candy was prodigiously talented, and certainly could have been funny at any weight. But still, some re-tooling would have been necessary. A character like Johnny LaRue or William B. Williams kind of HAD to be a bit of a slob. Getting healthy would have meant coming up with a whole new stable of characterizations for Candy. Which would have been a challenge. But preferable to the alternative, which turned out to be the case.
Posted by Glenn Kenny
at August 7, 2009 9:03 AM
comment #10
DeafBrownTrashPunk
says ...
Chris Farley comes to mind... although I was NEVER a fan of his works.
Posted by DeafBrownTrashPunk
at August 7, 2009 9:05 AM
comment #11
fattyhadaparty
says ...
You know what's really interesting, Jeff? The fact that you could read Alison Byrne Field's piece and miss the entire point; a point, I might add, that is only reinforced by yesterday's tasteless reprinting of that SPY hatchet piece. By going to all that effort in order to trash the recently deceased, and then linking your readers to "Sincerely, John Hughes", you unwittingly show us a portrait of a man who had the capacity to change and to rediscover the things that really matter in life; just like the classic Capra films that SPY accused Hughes of constantly ripping off.
Oooh, John Hughes was an abusive, selfish, bully (the only one in Hollywood). But you know what? When he couldn't cut it anymore as a writer/producer/director, at least he had the good sense to reevaluate his priorities and focus on a more worthwhile goal like raising his sons. So, even though he died far too young, I'd like to think that he found more fulfillment in the few short years after he left Hollywood, than in the ones before. And, at the very least, I'll always have SIXTEEN CANDLES, SHE'S HAVING A BABY, FERRIS BUELLER'S DAY OFF and PLANES, TRAINS & AUTOMOBILES to remember him by.
P.S. I'd like to think that the course of Mr. Hughes' life and passing would offer a "teaching moment" for your own. But, given your astounding ability to willfully ignore anything but your own perspective, I know that would be foolish.
"But this is what genius-level auteurs do -- they create their own worlds by investing in them whole-hog. "
Posted by fattyhadaparty
at August 7, 2009 9:10 AM
comment #12
nemo
says ...
How did "they" work John Candy too hard? Hold a gun to his head? John Candy was an adult. If he wanted to make fewer movies per year, all he had to do was sign on to fewer movies per year.
When it comes to health and body image, John Hughes sounds as delusional as Michael Jackson ever was.
Posted by nemo
at August 7, 2009 10:32 AM
comment #13
mccool
says ...
A very unsympathetic piece for such an anti-conservative, liberal-minded bleeding heart like jeff. You mean individuals control their own destiny? Their responsible for their own decisions and their consequences? They're not victims when they give in to the temptations of the opportunists, leeches, and pushers all around them?? It's not society's job to save someone from themself and their bad habits? I killed John Candy. You killed John Candy. The beer-drinking Jeffrey Wells would say we all killed John Candy.
For those keeping score today at home...conservative jeff 1, liberal jeff 0.
Posted by mccool
at August 7, 2009 10:34 AM
comment #14
a1
says ...
You completely missed the real killer of John Candy....candy.
Posted by a1
at August 7, 2009 10:37 AM
comment #15
lonniechung
says ...
I loved John Hughes movies when I was a kid (up until Home Alone) but have no interest in revisiting them. They worked for me then, I know they won't now, and I'll leave it at that. So I had sort of a blank "he was young, what's he been up to" feeling when I heard the news. I remember that Spy article when it came out, and Hughes was an easy (welcome) target; on the downside of his career, spinning his wheels not moving forward at all creatively. Then he virtually disappeared. I respect that. He did what he did for a period of time, and he did it quite well. His movies were aimed at a particular crowd who appreciated his work. The cinematic value was low, but the entertainment value was high (and that's obviously what he was after). The Fields story is a fitting coda - heartwarming, one-dimensional and easy to love.
Posted by lonniechung
at August 7, 2009 10:40 AM
comment #16
bluefugue
says ...
>Hello...? I was kidding! Was Lenny Bruce fat? Jerry Seinfeld? Mort Sahl? Richard Pryor, Woody Allen, Sarah Silverman, George Carlin, Eddie Murphy, Richard Lewis, Andy Kaufman, Robin Williams, Gilbert Gottfried, Albert Brooks, Chris Rock, Dick Gregory, David Brenner, Bill Cosby, etc.?
But certain actors and comedians get typecast as The Fat Guy, and I bet there are career consequences if they lose weight. A thin John Candy would project a different persona -- or for that matter Wayne Knight or Sidney Greenstreet or whoever. As an actor/star/personality you create and project a type that audiences become familiar with; they become comfortable with it; you become a known quantity and this is why you get cast in future movies. So I think there's a real financial incentive for some overweight stars to stay overweight. Which obviously has terrible health consequences.
Posted by bluefugue
at August 7, 2009 2:49 PM
comment #17
CitizenKanedforChewingGum
says ...
"No, none of the comedians you cite were/are fat, true. Hence, they never made fat part of their schtick, as Candy did."
You know what? If you're making fat part of your schtick (not talking here or there, I mean constantly), you're probably not really that funny in the first place. I know that's not what you were saying, Glenn, just making a point I felt need made.
I agree with you about Candy, btw...he was just an inherently funny guy. Not a sight gag.
Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum
at August 7, 2009 3:08 PM
comment #18
Joshua Mooney
says ...
bluefugue, you forgot Redd Foxx. Otherwise, good point.
Where in Manhattan did Hughes die while taking his walk? I don't mean to be morbid about this. It just bugs me that no press reports say where he fell. So I can honor that spot. Big Hughes fan. I remember when my old mentor Tim White (taught me how to tie a proper bow-tie) of Billboard dropped dead of a heart attack just up the street from me in the lobby of the VNU building. I'd like to know where Hughes died, is that so wrong?
Posted by Joshua Mooney
at August 7, 2009 4:33 PM
comment #19
danny bloom
says ...
Why are there no current photos of JH online anywhere? is it true that he had become grossly overweight like John Candy and John Goodman and Marlin Brando over the past 15 years and that he was fat and diabetic and knew he was on a fast track to pokkuri sudden death? I loved the man, his work, his genius, he movies, his walking away from Hollywood, who he blamed for Candy's death at 43, but what about the personal here? Was JH overweight, grossly or just a bit and why? Did he have history of heart disease in his family, mom or dad or grandpa? Somebody should be looking into these details too. People just don't pop off and die. They also take with them secrets and things the public never hears until much later. Let's find out now why he died at 59 from a H attack.... NOT ONE BLOG has looked into this so far.
Posted by danny bloom
at August 8, 2009 1:27 AM
comment #20
danny bloom
says ...
Sir blogger, you got it wrong in your intro, you said her letters to JH were in 1997, read her blog carefully, it says : "For two years (1985-1987), John Hughes and I wrote letters back and forth. "
1985 to 1987......NOT 1997
You are forgiven. don't screen so fast. read more slowly on screens.
danny
Tufts 1971
re
For two years (1985-1987), John Hughes and I wrote letters back and forth.
Posted by danny bloom
at August 8, 2009 1:30 AM
comment #21
Anna80
says ...
John Candy was a great actor and he played a great part in some great movies. I watched a lot of his movies when I was younger. It's such a shame he didn't just lose weight and get himself into a healthier state so he could have lived longer.
But saying that, I suppose that was just him. And I know it might sound a bit weird but I think the fact he was overweight was a big part of his character.
Posted by Anna80
at December 17, 2009 1:44 PM
Post a comment