"In capitalism as envisioned by its leading lights, including Adam Smith and Alfred Marshall, you need a moral foundation in order for free markets to work," Arianna Huffington writes in a current piece. "And when a company fails, it fails. It doesn't get bailed out using trillions of dollars of taxpayer money. What we have right now is Corporatism -- i.e., welfare for the rich. It's Wall Street having their taxpayer-funded cake and eating it too. It's socialized losses and privatized gains.
"Which is why -- although you can bet many will try -- Capitalism: A Love Story can't be dismissed as a left-wing tirade. Its condemnation of the status quo is too grounded in real stories and real suffering, its targets too evenly spread across the political spectrum.
"Indeed, Jay Leno, America's designated Everyman, was so moved by the film he insisted that Moore appear on the second night of his new show, and told his audience that the film was "completely nonpartisan...I was stunned by it, and I think it is the most fair film" Moore has done.
"After a preview screening last week (at which I did a q & a session with Michael), he came over to my home for a late night bite. Over lasagna, he told me..."
Stop right there! Nobody eats pasta and especially lasagna (with all the ground meat and cheese and butter and whatnot) late at night. Anyone who does this is asking for tens of thousands of extra calories and jowly faces and all kinds of surplus bulk.
Back to Arianna: "[Moore] told me about an incident that occurred while he was filming that exemplifies how the economic crisis cannot be looked at through a left vs right prism. It happened while he and his crew were shooting the climax of the movie, where Michael decides to mark Wall Street as a crime scene, putting up yellow police tape around some of the financial district's towers of power.
"While unfurling the tape in front of a 'too big to fail' bank, he became aware of a group of New York's finest approaching him. Moore has a long history of dealing with policemen and security guards trying to shut him down, but in this case he knew he was, however temporarily, defacing private property. And his shooting schedule didn't leave room for a detour to the local jail. So, as the lead officer came closer, Moore tried to deflect him, saying: 'Just doing a little comedy here, officer. I'll be gone in a minute, and will clean up before I go.'
"The officer looked at him for a moment, then leaned in: 'Take all the time you need.' He nodded to the bank and said, 'These guys wiped out a lot of our Police Pension Funds.' The officer turned and slowly headed back to his squad car. Moore wanted to put the moment in his film, but realized it could cost the cop his job, and decided to leave it out. 'When they've lost the police,' he told me, 'you know they're in trouble.'
"There is a real sense of urgency to Capitalism: A Love Story. I asked Michael what impact he hoped the film would have. He chuckled and said that, in some way, he had made the movie for 'an audience of one. President Obama. I hope he sees it and remembers who put him in the White House... and it wasn't Goldman Sachs.'"
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on September 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM
comment #1
allstar397
says ...
I cant wait to see the crowds cheering this movie...while wearing Nikes, and updating their Facebook statuses on their IPhones. But they think they hate corporations while simultaneously feeding them every single day.
Posted by allstar397
at September 22, 2009 9:19 AM
comment #2
slutsky
says ...
I know, it's like people protesting the government while still using sidewalks! You've discredited any criticism of capitalism just like that!!
Posted by slutsky
at September 22, 2009 9:36 AM
comment #3
Colin
says ...
Leno is extremely fair person; if he says it is non-partisan I can't help but imagine a lot of other people will find it that way as well.
Posted by Colin
at September 22, 2009 9:39 AM
comment #4
allstar397
says ...
Slutsky, how you found a way to compare using sidewalks to buying "evil" consumer goods is amazing. Needs and wants are very different things.
Posted by allstar397
at September 22, 2009 10:18 AM
comment #5
Vernon Hardapple
says ...
Slutsky and Allstar:
You are either both very young and/or naive, or simply not thinking all that clearly.
Allstar, you are correct in pointing pit the small-mindedness of Slutsly's comment. Surely, there is a difference between wants and needs, an his argument has nothing to do with Mr. Moore's comments.
However, your comment regarding some supposed hypocrisy regarding the purchasing of goods that are not needed (IE Conspicuous Consumption, and the foundation of this, andany other Western nations economies), also lacks a certain amount of relevancy.
One is by hypocritical if one attends a screening of "Capitalism"
wearing a pair of Nike's, one is simply a consumer like all Americans--commodified up to our necks, for sure, but that has no relevancy to Moore' comment above.
Posted by Vernon Hardapple
at September 22, 2009 11:21 AM
comment #6
slutsky
says ...
Ok ADMITTEDLY I wrote that comment when I had just woken up and was cranky. But my point is that there can be a middle ground... you can criticize capitalism without having to completely renounce your running shoes.
Posted by slutsky
at September 22, 2009 11:58 AM
comment #7
Josh Massey
says ...
"Moore wanted to put the moment in his film, but realized it could cost the cop his job, and decided to leave it out."
Does anybody really buy that? Has Moore not heard of blurring and voice distortion? He would have never left that out.
Posted by Josh Massey
at September 22, 2009 12:34 PM
comment #8
Ryansi51
says ...
I eat lasagna late night ALL the time
* takes another hit *
Posted by Ryansi51
at September 22, 2009 1:00 PM
comment #9
allstar397
says ...
obviously lost in my snarky one liner was my real point; many things we love come as a direct result of capitalism. Lets make sure not villify the very idea of capitalism b/c its the thing to do, lets figure out how to keep it in check without stifling growth/innovation. I sound a little less obnoxious in this post i think lol
Posted by allstar397
at September 22, 2009 2:38 PM
comment #10
ErrantElan
says ...
"Obviously last in my snarky one liner..."
And you've obviously lost the point of the entire piece, though that's probably purposeful. Seems to me the entire thing, from Wells, Moore, Huffington, and even Leno, is that this isn't a broadside at capitalism, but at corporatism, particularly the evil gangsterism that's been going on since Reagan.
Yes, companies such as Nike do some terrible shit (sweatshops, etc.), but individual corporations aren't as big a problem.
Posted by ErrantElan
at September 22, 2009 3:31 PM
comment #11
lipranzer
says ...
I just sent an e-mail to Jeff about this, but on the off chance he doesn't get to post it due to having to understandably worry about things like finding a new place to live, here's the gist:
I attended a screening of Moore's movie last night (it's early Wednesday morning on the East Coast as I'm typing this) at the AMC Loews Lincoln Square 13 theater in Manhattan, on the corner of West 68th Street and Broadway - I'm making the location public for reasons that will soon be made clear. Though the lights went off at 7 pm exactly (by my watch, anyway), which was when the movie was supposed to start, after the credits, the movie went out of focus, and stayed that way for approximately 3-4 minutes, despite the loud complaints by the audience members of the packed house, and people like me going out to the lobby and complaining directly to the staff and asking them to fix the problem. Finally, the film went back into focus, but near the end of the film, it went slightly out of focus again (though you had to be paying attention). So when the end credits came up, and after I had gone to the bathroom (I had wolfed down dinner right before the screening), I went to the staff to complain, and saw another audience member had beaten me to it. I only got to hear part of the conversation, but after he patiently tried to clarify their point, the staff member basically said the discussion was over and asked him to leave. I asked the man what the theater staff had said, and he told me apparently they were using night vision lenses, or something like that, to deliberately distort the focus of the movie so people wouldn't be able to copy the movie, as a way to combat movie piracy.
Now, there are two options here as I see it. The first option is the theater staff member was lying, by himself or at someone else's behest, and this was all part of some plan to try and sabotage the screening by creating bad word-of-mouth for Moore's movie (if that was the case, it didn't work - the audience laughed at all the right places, were quiet at all the right places, applauded the film at the end, and on my way to and from the bathroom, I heard people discussing it). The other option is the staff member was telling the truth, and this was the colossally stupid tactic of the theater owner, as well as the studio (Overture Films), to combat piracy. Do they really think alienating moviegoers is a good price to pay for trying to halt this so-called epidemic of piracy?
I e-mailed Moore as well, asking him to contact the theaters that show his movie to make sure none of them pull this stunt again, and I intend to spread the word and tell people to avoid going to this theater again until they promise not to pull this kind of stunt again. I realize in the scheme of things this may not rank as important, but it is a case of corporations thinking they can get away with anything, which is exactly the kind of thinking Moore is railing against in the film.
Posted by lipranzer
at September 22, 2009 9:16 PM
comment #12
Natali Watson
says ...
Hello friends,this is a nice site and I wanted to post a note to let you know, good job! Thanks
Best regards, Natali, CEO of free music download sites
download songs
Posted by Natali Watson
at June 24, 2011 7:08 AM