comment #1

Joel says ...

Girlfight was great, but I gave up on Kusama after Aeon Flux.

comment #2

Travis Crabtree says ...

"Girlfight" made squat.

"Jennifer's Body" will make fuck-loads-upon-fuck-loads of money.

Such is the world we live in.

And I swear, if I hear ONE person say "yeah, I know it'll probably suck, but I'm gonna see it anyway...."
Rrrrrrrgggggg.

comment #3

Postavant says ...

Aeon Flux was wretched and a huge step down from Girlfight, but Juno is still the best film of the last two years or so, so...we'll see. I'm conflicted on this one, and will end up seeing it because I have to. Don't know if I'll love it or not.

comment #4

televisiontears says ...

Postavant, not to be a dick, but can I help you with something:

Juno is still your *favorite* film of the last two years or so.

comment #5

Postavant says ...

I have a superiority complex. My opinions are facts. Yaddi yaddi yaddah. Figured it would just be read as an opinion anyway, it gets redundant.

comment #6

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

You obviously have a superiority complex if you consider an inferior work such as Juno the "best anything" of the last two years.

comment #7

frankbooth says ...

Doesn't Rose McGowan already have this turf covered? Well, I guess she's getting "old." Put her on an ice floe and bring in the new meat.

Invest wisely, Megan.

comment #8

btwnproductions says ...

I'd see a movie called "Show Us Yer Tits."

comment #9

LexG says ...

Megan Fox is a symbol of EVERYTHING that EVERY STRAIGHT MAN on this planet ought to seek to achieve.

NO MAN's wife or girlfriend is as hot and sexy as Megan Fox, and thus NO MAN's life is fulfilled if they're not with her or a COMPARABLE actress/celebrity (Alba, Hilton, Stewart, Johansson, etc.)

They are the prizes of GODS ON EARTH, the ONE THING every man thinks about EVERY WAKING SECOND OF HIS LIFE from puberty: FEMALE PERFECTION, and by extension being the KING, being GOD, from having sex with THE ULTIMATE WOMAN whom all women envy and whom all men desire.

Face it, Jeff, you KNOW she's hot, you KNOW you're turned on by her... this vendetta seems to be a case of protesting too much. EVERY hetero man on this planet is OBSESSED with Megan Fox and the women I listed, and all terrestrial women fall short, because EVERY MAN on this earth would dump his frau wife or girlfriend for 11 seconds with THE FOX.

BOW.

comment #10

G.N.A. says ...

Juno was a very enjoyable movie. Overrated, but entertaining nonetheless.

Somehow I think the reviews will be even harsher just because Diablo Cody wrote it.

comment #11

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

Lex's diatribes always seem to come off like those rambling monologues in some lost Bret Easton Ellis manuscript shoved disgustedly into a drawer around 1996.

comment #12

Gabriel says ...

In other news, Postavant has only seen one film in the past two years.

comment #13

LexG says ...

Much like THE GREAT Tom Leykis, I speak the truth. I'm like the Tyler Durden of horniness.

Real men want ONE THING and ONE THING ONLY:

A hot, FAMOUS chick. Everything short of it is just a dude selling himself short and convincing himself he's happy.

MAKE IT HAPPEN.

comment #14

Wrecktem says ...

"She has all the natural soul-charisma of a porn star."

You just now figured this out? Contrary to Lex's slavering, Megan Fox is everything that's WRONG about female sexuality today. No charm. Just raw, dead "fuck me" eyes, gross tats and a tweaker's body. Perfect for the 21st century world of YouPorn and RedTube but certainly not anything approaching what is necessary for a legitmate film career.

comment #15

bildeaux says ...

This reminds me of that awesome topless robot "transformers 2 faq" post.

Can you explain Megan Fox's appeal?
Yes. She looks like a porn star and has the same acting talent as one, yet for some reason she makes mainstream movies. This tonal disconnect is what's so appealing about her.

funny stuff -
http://www.toplessrobot.com/2009/06/bonus_robs_transformers_2_faqs.php

comment #16

great scott says ...

If only this site had ads featuring Megan Fox instead of Michael Moore.

comment #17

LexG says ...

Fox's tats are NOT "gross," and her body type?

It's called BEING HOT.

Anytime some dude pipes up that he "likes curves" and wants "some cushion for the pushin'", that's code for I CAN'T GET A HOT SKINNY CHICK.

FOX POWER. BOW TO IT.

comment #18

malibugigolo says ...

Megan Fox. Not hot. She looks smoky and sort of exhausted from that special sheen of exhaust you can only get from being clouded with a large plume of smoke from a mass transit bus.

comment #19

televisiontears says ...

Lex's posts like this creep me the fuck out.

Also did he just refer to Paris Hilton as "a prize of gods on earth", "female perfection" and "the ultimate woman"?

Head, meet explosion. Sad, sad explosion. Sadplosion.

comment #20

LexG says ...

Christ, another eunech clocks in.

Anyone who's not down with The Fox is either a liar or flamingly gay.

I give up on you guys. For real.

Thought I guess I should be happy there's less competition, since apparently if M-Fox walked into a room full of 100 L.A. hanger-on assholes, 98 of you would leave in disgust to go hit on Kathy Griffin and Janeaene Garofolo, leaving just me and THE B.A.G. to appreciate the fact that she IS GOD.

comment #21

LexG says ...

T-Tears:

YEP YEP. Bow to the Hilt. The Monroe of the New Millennium, only she doesn't weigh 220.

comment #22

KC says ...

I hate that the Movieline review has me wanting to check it out when I remember reading the script and being awed by what a shit pile it was. Gotta say though that if nothing else Megan Fox makes an absolutely perfect villain/bully figure for a teen girl high school movie

comment #23

televisiontears says ...

You really need to get laid.

comment #24

longrunner says ...

Not gonna happen.

comment #25

lazarus says ...

I don't like Megan Fox OR Diablo Cody, but am I the only person who didn't think Aeon Flux was that bad? Granted I saw it at the $2 theatre and wasn't experting much, but it certainly wasn't lowest common denominator sci-fi. Had a few good set pieces, faithful but imaginative set design, an interesting story, and Theron delivered as usual. People act like it was on a Uwe Boll or Paul W.S. Anderson level of audience-insulting crap, and I think that's a bit unfair.

comment #26

LexG says ...

Laz: And not just for even the Theron Catsuit reasons...

I thought Aeon Flux was very good, very impressive, interesting in look and thematics... extremely underrated sci-fi flick.

comment #27

televisiontears says ...

It seems like no one actually saw Aeon Flux and its reputation was part of the package. It's a 36 on Metacritic, which seems a bit harsh.

I wouldn't say it's very good, but I enjoyed it.

comment #28

BoshBarnetWonkyDonkey says ...

Karyn Kusama is the female Lee Tamahori.

Lex: Megan Fox isn't that hot by Hollywood standards. She's just the best marketed starlet in years. Give her agents an award or something.

comment #29

p.Vice says ...

Megan who?

comment #30

Colin says ...

Write in campaign to have Lex play Bret Easton Ellis in Lunar Park instead of Benicio Del Toro.

Frankly I'm tired of Megan Fox and I think a certain someone watched American Psycho and thought it was a total connect to themself, not realizing it was a seething satire.

comment #31

Pynchon8 says ...

And it looks like Esquire is going to go with her for Sexiest Woman Alive so you can tack a few more months onto her shelf life.

comment #32

LexG says ...

"Sexiest Woman Alive..."

Damn right.

Well, Fox or K-Stew.

comment #33

corey3rd says ...

she's a dumb guy's Caroline Munro. She's a vapid Jennifer Connelly.

After watching her completely deflate on How to Alienate People, I've pretty much lost any desire to think she has anything to offer besides "looking hot." She got all the acting talent of a lost Landers sister - not even a Gabor (those women had personality). Her being the guest star of the season's first SNL might just end her career.

Ultimately this film might not make box office gold. It might just become a well rented Netflix title.

Far as being every man's dream - even NHL players wouldn't want Brian Austin Green's sloppy seconds.

comment #34

LexG says ...

"Far as being every man's dream - even NHL players wouldn't want Brian Austin Green's sloppy seconds."

David Silver 4 Life.

Shit, I'd have NO problem with it.

M-Fox = BEYOND hotness.

comment #35

cantona_x says ...

Can't agree with Jeff more on this case:

a porn star used by a porn director in two continous robot porn

comment #36

LexG says ...

Also: Fox was utterly delightful in LEX'S FOURTH OF JULY FANTASY:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm7SJJKAB8M

comment #37

alynch says ...

Ah, the internet, where people can pretend to have hilariously high standards.

comment #38

Scott Mendelson says ...

Aen Flux was just good enough to make me wish it were better. It had real ideas, rich colors, and a few interesting action scenes. I'll never watch it again, but I'm glad I saw it once.

comment #39

Nick X says ...

Juno was my least favorite movie of all time. I would have much preferred to watch a two hour film in the vein of The Passion of the Christ in which every character from Juno was scourged to a bloody rag. It was like Lars von Trier (maybe my least favorite living director) tried to direct Garden State (my third least favorite movie of all night).

comment #40

Nick X says ...

uh, all time, not all night. i've been drinking.

comment #41

televisiontears says ...

LexG, I don't think many people are denying that Megan Fox is physically attractive. Okay, she's hot. Now... can we move past that? Some people require a little more than early 20's physical aesthetics to be turned on. We enjoy talent, intellect and character. A seemingly vapid celebrity who I've never met can't do anything for me.

Maybe it's my personal tastes, but I don't understand this phenomenon of fantasizing about models and other celebrities.

comment #42

LexG says ...

Talent: Who cares. No one cares about actresses' talent. It's a fact. Even chick flicks, even GOOD chick flicks, DO NOT MAKE MONEY. Because even women don't care about female acting talent, except for the five Yentas who go to see Kate Winslet and Emma Thompson movies. To 100% of straight men who aren't film world douchebags trying to impress people with their PC liberal credentials, we'd rather see Alba or Johansson for 2 hours than Amy Adams or Kate Winslet. If you'd rather see the latter two? You just might be gay.

Intellect: Could NOT care less. This goes for real life. Ladies, look hot, be flirtatious and fun, and you could be a functional fucking illiterate. All that shit goes right out the window in the sack. Being an overeducated guy, I've only EVER dated educated women, and it's not fun. They're annoying. In general, women are pretty annoying anyway. Which is why I never want another stable relationship or marriage EVER again. Been there, done that. BOREDOM.

Character: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. After I hit it once, I never wanna see or talk to a hot chick EVER again, so by all means, she can go back to spreading for whoever, whenever.

And I fantasize about these women because I AM GOING TO BE THE MOST FAMOUS PERSON WHO EVER LIVED, and this will be my dating pool.

I have wanted to BE FAMOUS since I was eight years old. A desire that only grew after being a picked-on nerd in high school, a nobody commuter in college, a failed artist in my 20s, a suburbanized white-collar henpecked douche in my late 20s and early 30s.

Two years ago I SNAPPED and decided I was going to act a fool, say what I want to say, act irresponsible, and be an asshole to anyone and everyone. And I'd drink and party as much as humanly possible, because I never had that fun adolescence and college oats-sowing that most normal people do.

Unfortunately, at nearly 37 years of age, it's hard to get a POSSE going and hard to meet "hot chicks" in L.A., when every remotely attractive woman is angling up to directors, producers, writers, rappers, players.

So basically my FIGHT CLUB, or SEX CLUB, as it would be, consists of me berating women in chat rooms while downing cheap beer, with the occasional guys night out at a strip club with a bunch of other pushing-40s sadsacks. And my "acting, writing and comedy" consists of me posting here and on Poland's blog.

comment #43

DeeZee says ...

Travis: When do horror comedies make money? Hell, Idle Hands had pre-"fame" Alba in her skimpies, and it bombed.

Lex: Seeing Mila Kunis in a bunch of tight outfits in Extract made me forget about Fox. I think my problem with the latter actress is, like Alba, she's trying too hard to look and sound like a pseudo-slut, but doesn't have the sensuality to seal the deal. In other words, she's a little too "obvious", and guys like myself prefer the "playing-hard-to-get" types.

comment #44

DeeZee says ...

"Unfortunately, at nearly 37 years of age, it's hard to get a POSSE going and hard to meet "hot chicks" in L.A., when every remotely attractive woman is angling up to directors, producers, writers, rappers, players."

I think the real problem with hooking up in L.A. is it takes anywhere from 1-2 hours just to pick up someone for a date nowadays. And that doesn't include actual place(s) you have the date.

comment #45

LexG says ...

DZ, Kunis is high on my list, have no fears.

I'd like to give her some vanilla extract.

ZING.

comment #46

DeeZee says ...

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/jennifer-s-body-film-review-1004011124.story
Jeff has another Hancock to hate.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118008440.html?categoryid=13&cs=1
Why are studios still making superhero comedies when they always bomb?
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118008447.html?categoryid=13&cs=1
3D finally gets some funding.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i85a75f3355f4093d7cb396ac259a5407

comment #47

Travis Crabtree says ...

I've walked this path before, but here it is again.......

I swear, some people.

Did "Juno" come to your house, rape your wife, shoot your dog then steal your car?

The hate some folks have for that movie is just head scratching. You'd think Sarah Palin directed it.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion yadda and if you think it was over-rated, fine. It probably was.

But I have to call bullshit. If some of the haters wandered into Sundance, sat down and watched the film knowing NOTHING about who wrote it or directed it I'm certain many would say "hey, that's a fun little movie. I liked it".

Was there an exact date on the calender when it suddenly became really, really cool to hate "Juno"?

comment #48

LexG says ...

I liked "Juno."

YAY.

comment #49

Nick X says ...

I hated Juno with deep, visceral passion the moment I saw it, and I would have done so if I had never heard word one about it. I did, in fact, see it quite early on.

comment #50

Travis Crabtree says ...

I just don't get it.

Not like, fine.

But why hate? Was it so offensive? I'd think "hate" would be reserved for cynical studio crap like "G I Joe".

I'd really like to know.

comment #51

hiviper says ...

"her characters tend to sound more like hyperarticulate pop-culture savants than recognizable adolescents"

- from Juntin Chang's Variety review (which could apply to Juno as well).

So it's more of the same cutesey shit from Cody.

comment #52

LexG says ...

Travis:

I liked it fine, but that "home skillet" and "honest to blog" dialogue is the kind of shit that's SO embarrassing, it makes a man shrivel up like he just took a Gordie Howe slapshot to the fucking bozack.

It's like if Slappy White looked directly into a fish-eye lens and muttered some babytalk nonsense like "zoinky-pooky-poo" for 91 minutes while smacking his lips.

comment #53

DeeZee says ...

http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/15104/toronto-review-jennifer-s-body-

comment #54

televisiontears says ...

LexG, you genuinely frighten me. I'm not kidding. Please don't date rape anyone. Please...?

comment #55

televisiontears says ...

As I posted that, I realized I might be too late.

comment #56

zap says ...

liked JUNO tons

comment #57

eoguy says ...

Just saw the midnight screening at TIFF, and what an awful movie. Aside from the occasional diablo Cody line, there's nothing redeeming in this, except maybe the girls kissing.

Megan Fox is as flat as always, and everybody else is just filler, including Adam Brody, who is hardly in the movie. The plotline is all over the place, and it never really achieves anything. As for the scares, it's true, there are a few attempts, but none of them will make you jump.

This is a real dud.

comment #58

The Winchester says ...

I'm just glad there are others who like Aeon Flux, I've been defending my like of that film for 4 years now. Sure, not the greatest film, but when you have your main character dropping a tab of something to have a meeting in the subconscious, that's a movie that has ideas. Might not be too successful in conveying said ideas, but at least it's trying.

And I'm a Juno lover, too.

And yet, I'm not really looking forward to this movie, despite the Movieline rave that got me a little excited about it.

comment #59

DeeZee says ...

Trick 'r Treat trailer. http://www.darkhorizons.com/trailers/

comment #60

lazarus says ...

Would now be a bad time to also mention I liked The Island as well? I mean, yeah it could have been better, but had a couple of very attractive leads, and for a Michael Bay film, was actually pretty intelligent? Again, it shouldn't have been lumped in with the sci-fi for bottom-feeders.

comment #61

The Winchester says ...

The Island would have been awesome if they marketed just the first 45 minutes of the movie, instead of the typical Michael Bay stuff that fills up the end. That being said, I find it more enjoyable and less insulting than the transforming robots series.

comment #62

DeeZee says ...

lazarus: You do know it's an unauthorized remake of Clonus, don't you?

comment #63

Nick X says ...

Yes, it was so offensive. It induced nausea in me. All that self-regarding babytalk was infantilizing, squirm-inducing, awful. So awful, so smug.

comment #64

Rich S. says ...

Oh, goody. The critics have apparently decided to do an "Inglourious Basterds"-style take-down of Diablo Cody and Megan Fox. "Your 15 minutes are over girls. Back to the 90210 reboot."

It would be funny if this turned out the same way as IB, making scads of money.

comment #65

Momus says ...

The only hot chick in "How To Lose Friends" was Gillian Anderson. Megan tried so hard. Too hard, as usual. And whenever she opens her mouth, it gets even worse.

Whatevs. In a year's time the LexG's of the contemporary world will get some new meat to chew on. Metaphorically speaking, because the meat will never be available to them and it's not even new. ;)

comment #66

jasctt says ...

What did people except from the dumbass writer behind JUNO?

comment #67

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

"and for a Michael Bay film, was actually pretty intelligent?"

Kinda like saying, "for a man diagnosed with Parkinson's, Michael J. Fox doesn't really shake that much..."

comment #68

Alboone says ...

I keep going back to this saying: if it ain't scary, then it aint working. Sadism is not a suitable subistitute for tension. And I'm sorry if I might come off as a chauvnist pig but what the fuck are they thinking of not showing Megan Fox's tits. If she was around during the 80's this would've been a prerequsite.

comment #69

Michael says ...

I liked Juno overall, but it was an odd movie. It had the brutally awful cutesy dialogue, but...it also had maybe the best 'argument' scene I can remember. Garner and Bateman going back and forth in their breakup scene floored me with how good it was.

'Don't mock me.'

comment #70

jasctt says ...

If I had a kid as annoying as Juno, I'd put a pillow over her face.

comment #71

corey3rd says ...

Without Megan Fox going topless, this film has zero chance of survival after a critical beatdown. At least with Basterd, people went to see the brutality of baseball bats to the foreheads.

comment #72

DeeZee says ...

Rich: Except IB didn't make a ton of money, because it was over-budget, and the profits ended up being split between companies. And JB will probably do as well as Swimfan at best.

Alboone: That' the norm nowadays. That R-rated Alba comedy was like that, too, unfortunately.

corey: That's what I thought with that Alba flick, and it did actually make money. And I thought people saw Basterds because they wanted to hear the basterds talk about killing nazis for 2 1/2 hours.

comment #73

DeeZee says ...

Well, ok, if people are stupid enough to make Good Luck Chuck a hit, I guess JB could actually do that well.

comment #74

DeeZee says ...

Unless Sorority Row has nudity, of course.

comment #75

corey3rd says ...

Good Luck Chuck made $34 million. Which probably made it break even when you figure out the amount of cash Dane Cook had to pay for his body waxer.

Also Good Luck Chuck was being sold as a dopey date night flick.

Anyone really going to take their potential new lover to see Jennifer's Body? And the sexiness loses it when Fox's mouth turns into fangface.

Maybe it'll make its money from women thinking this is the follow up to Mama Mia.

Sorority Row has that disturbing Willis offspring and the ditz from The Hills. If they are beaten to death with a baseball bat by Princess Leia, I might see it in Imax.

comment #76

George Prager says ...

JENNIFER'S BODY sounds a hell of a lot more realistic than JUNO.

Anyway, let's take up a collection to send LexG to film school.

comment #77

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

"Except IB didn't make a ton of money, because it was over-budget, and the profits ended up being split between companies."

There's a huge difference between making money and making profit and your continued insistence on using the terms interchangeably is one of the many (read: many, many, many) reasons you're consistently perceived as the dumbest "contributor" on this site. Also, the fact that the profits are split between two companies has nothing to do with a picture's overall profitability, it simply means the particular companies made LESS of an investment in the movie (aka $50M on a $35M investment as opposed to $100M on a $70M investment).

It's really quite simple but the feeling all of this is just really beyond your comprehension. All of this from a movie that you were so confident would fail that you said it "already bombed" way back in March. HA!

"And JB will probably do as well as Swimfan at best."

I have a tendency to think it will to a little bit better than that. Partially because (as much as I hate to admit it) I think Megan Fox will be a draw, esp. in the horror genre, whose audience skews heavily towards young, lonely, horny male. But just mostly due to the fact that your predictions are ALWAYS WRONG.

comment #78

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

"Anyway, let's take up a collection to send LexG to film school."

I'll pitch in. My only request is that the first 5 years of my donations would have to go strictly towards a highly-trained psychiatrist.

comment #79

George Prager says ...

"I cannot dismiss Jennifer's Body," LexG has written. "It is a real film. It will remain in my mind. The Fox has reached me and shaken me. It is up to me to decide what that means...

comment #80

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

I think we all know what that means.

comment #81

BurmaShave says ...

"Seeing Mila Kunis in a bunch of tight outfits in Extract made me forget about Fox. I think my problem with the latter actress is, like Alba, she's trying too hard to look and sound like a pseudo-slut, but doesn't have the sensuality to seal the deal. In other words, she's a little too "obvious", and guys like myself prefer the "playing-hard-to-get" types."

Plus everything real girls do is just a rip-off of hentai.

comment #82

Ghost072 says ...

Juno was a fun, enjoyable movie...nothing more, nothing less. I agree with Travis that the hate is inexplicable. LexG is a raging misogynist who, for all his ravings about semi-talented actresses he'd like to bang, doesn't even really like women - certainly not as much as he hates himself. Actually, now that I think about it, maybe a sliver of that mentality is where the some of the hate for Juno comes from...

comment #83

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

Burma in with the comment of the day!

comment #84

RSBrown says ...

Diablo Cody wrote a shitty script?
Noooo--Really?

comment #85

pchu says ...

Watched it last night, it wasn't bad for the genre it's representing. Some of the dialogue is a bit annoying, but it's not as offensive or bad as you say Jeff. I will say this though, you don't feel the presence of Karyn Kusama who made Girlfight in this film. It's like she is just doing another job.

comment #86

jasctt says ...

Alternative female horror film: INSIDE.

comment #87

Gabriel says ...

Jeff's next post can't arrive (and knock this thread from the top of HE home) soon enough.

comment #88

Floyd Thursby says ...

"It's like if Slappy White looked directly into a fish-eye lens and muttered some babytalk nonsense like 'zoinky-pooky-poo' for 91 minutes while smacking his lips."

Where's my time machine when I need it? Andy, meet Slappy. Slappy, meet Andy.

comment #89

Josh Tate says ...

Considering Jason Reitman made the excellent Thank You For Smoking and the apparently excellent Up in the Air, I think he deserves more credit for Juno's success than Diablo's cloying script.

comment #90

Alboone says ...

That's fine and dandy pchu, but is it scary, is it 'Basic Instinct' sexy? Did you jump, did you feel tense while watching it?

comment #91

The Winchester says ...

All horror movies should strive for "Basic Instinct" sexy.

comment #92

pchu says ...

It's not scray, but then again this genre (teenage horror) never really scares me (and I watched this after watching AntiChrist, so everything is tame in comparison). It's amusing at times, there are some sexy scenes, some annoying dialogue. I have a good time watching the movie, but doesn't have a lot of substance.

comment #93

Travis Crabtree says ...

It's fun to bag on it now, but I remember seeing "Basic Instinct" when it came out, and that movie was sexy as hell. I specifically remember at the night club when Sharon's dirty dancing with her sometimes-girlfriend Roxy.

And how many people, if asked, would've told you that Reitman directed "Juno"? ("I though Diablo directed it?")

Since Reitman is "cool" now, (what with "Up in the Air"), I look forward to several comments along the lines of "hey, I never said 'Juno' was poorly directed....it's directed just fine.... it's that script and whatever else Diablo Cody did that sucks worse than any movie ever made!"

comment #94

lazarus says ...

I found Thank You For Smoking to have a much more interesting visual approach than Juno. I imagine Reitman's main contribution to the latter was actually getting decent performances out of the people who had to speak that contrived tripe that was the dialogue. He probably didn't have time to think about anything else.

comment #95

KC says ...

Juno looks like a sitcom and its OST sounds like a diaper

comment #96

KC says ...

Great cast, though

comment #97

Travis Crabtree says ...

thanks, lazarus!

comment #98

Tom Reagan says ...

Juno was a sweet little film that got massively hyped out of all proportions and won an undeserved screenplay Oscar. Diablo Cody's script was alright, and she wrote some funny lines, but unfortunately each and every character talked the way Juno did, which shouldn't have happened. When Jennifer's Body comes out, I predict that several critics who praised Juno will recant their raves and diss Diablo big time. It looks like a horrible, trashy film, and I actually want to see it--just so I can see how horrible and trashy it is for myself.

By the way, I bet money that in ten years, Megan Fox will not be hot. She may be good looking now, but she's more "stripper hot" than anything else. Mark me: her good looks will not last.

comment #99

York "Budd" Durden says ...

I hope Wells didn't leave his laptop sitting on a cafe table whilst going for a whizz. We need TIFF reports.

comment #100

Josh Tate says ...

Basic Instinct had (and still has) a fantastic score.

comment #101

The Winchester says ...

So does Cherry 2000. Doesn't make it a good film.

comment #102

DavidF says ...

The secret to getting 100+ comments?
"Tits"

comment #103

Terry McCarty says ...

Saw Ms. Kusama's AEON FLUX on a tiny screen on a flight to South Carolina years ago. Wasn't too impressed, but will check out GIRLFIGHT sometime to see if the Lee Tamahori comparison of BoshBarnet is correct.

comment #104

corey3rd says ...

basic instinct was sold on snatch.

comment #105

Terry McCarty says ...

George Prager wrote:
Anyway, let's take up a collection to send LexG to film school.

If that happens, he'll probably want to remake FASTER PUSSYCAT! KILL! KILL! with Fox playing the Tura Satana role.

comment #106

Terry McCarty says ...

Tom Reagan wrote:
By the way, I bet money that in ten years, Megan Fox will not be hot. She may be good looking now, but she's more "stripper hot" than anything else. Mark me: her good looks will not last.

So you're saying that she'll turn into Pamela Anderson?

comment #107

LexG says ...

I already have a degree in Film Studies.

comment #108

George Prager says ...

Only a woman who is jealous of Megan Fox's looks would want Megan Fox to lose her hotness.

comment #109

drbob says ...

I cannot believe that this topic generated 108 comments. Now . . . .109.

comment #110

Nick X says ...

I saw Jennifer's Body this morning. And... I liked it. It's bad/incompetent in some ways, but it's also really, really fun. A trash-horror classic. I can totally see hating it, as Jeff did... but I can't deny I had a great time.

comment #111

DeeZee says ...

corey: By Alba non-CG standards, Good Luck Chuck was a big hit.

"Anyone really going to take their potential new lover to see Jennifer's Body?"

You never know. It's sorta being marketed as a "chick" flick.

Kane: I thought the only investments were in distribution, not production. And Megan Fox was supposed to be a draw in that Simon Pegg movie, but look what happened there.

Burma: Nope. I just have a thing for chicks who know how to use their figures, and Fox seems Kelly Bundy-like in her cluelessness in that area-like she just discovered how to play dress-up a few years ago. Even that recent women's magazine cover she's on makes her look amateur by comparison to other women in her age group.

Josh: I think Lifetime deserves credit for coming up with the same paper-thin idea before Reitman and Cody.

comment #112

dangovich says ...

It's fun to bag on it now, but I remember seeing "Basic Instinct" when it came out, and that movie was sexy as hell.

It was, at least until Michael Douglas' ass made an unwelcome appearance.

comment #113

CitizenKanedforChewingGum says ...

"I thought the only investments were in distribution, not production."

If so, all the more reason why this shouldn't affect whether or not a film such as IB is a "hit" with audiences. You may be right actually about the distribution, I just don't have any motivation to go look up how heavily a studio is invested in distributing a film. I have zero interest in it.

comment #114

cinefan says ...

"By Alba non-CG standards, Good Luck Chuck was a big hit."

D.Z. once again outdone himself in his display of idiocy: the film's budget was 25 million (not including advertising) and it made 34 million at the box office. Word of advice: you might want to remove your head from your butt from time to time to allow some oxygen to get to the brain.

comment #115

DeeZee says ...

dangovich: You just reminded me of a certain scene from Orgazmo.

cinefan: It made double that budget world-wide, though, which was probably better than expected, considering that movie with her in a bikini bombed.

comment #116

Jonah says ...

DZ logic

A Jessica Alba film that is long forgotten made (according to him, and he's lied before, but I'm not going to look it up) double its budget world wide.

This is a hit, in his book. Of course, he leaves out P + A because it's not convenient for him to include it this time.

IB has more than doubled it's budget world wide, will probably triple it, but it's not a hit. Because DZ doesn't like Quentin Tarantino.

This is DZ's logic.

comment #117

DeeZee says ...

Jonah: Even with P+A, 'Chuck is probably low-budget enough to be lucrative, while IB is pricey enough to actually end up making less than one "volume" of Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction, even with the larger audience.

comment #118

Wiggumx says ...

"Good Luck Chuck" made $59,192,128 worldwide. So, it had an estimated $25 mil budget, and then had P & A. That's 2.4 times it's budget.

"Inglourious Basterds" has made $181,621,857 on an estimated $70 mil budget, and it's still making money. That's 2.6 times it's budget.

How is "Good Luck Chuck" a hit but "Inglorious Basterds" is not?

comment #119

Jonah says ...

DZ,

Chuck has made about 10-20 million more than it's budget and p+a.

IB has made about 90 million more than it's budget and p+a.

If I were a producer, I'd rather have my name on IB. No question.

I don't doubt you feel differently, but you're an idiot.

comment #120

DeeZee says ...

Jonah: Considering the studio expectations for IB were probably higher than for that of GLC, and considering that it was only profitable through WW sales, I'd say IB was a bit more of a disappointment. I mean, IB's already lost ground in that market to the fourth movie in a second-tier horror series, just because the latter is in 3-d. Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill had a lot more stamina than that. Yeah, IB might get some Oscar nods, but it'll long be forgotten by then, because it's another remake/homage, and thus can't stand on its own without being compared to other war flicks. Once again, QT is "over".

comment #121

Jonah says ...

"Considering the studio expectations for IB were probably higher than for that of GLC, and considering that it was only profitable through WW sales, I'd say IB was a bit more of a disappointment. "

Why would they have high expectations for a film that , in your own words, most everybody thought was going to fail?

10 million profit versus 90 milion plus (and still going) profit. I'm not a math genius but I know which one I would take.

"Yeah, IB might get some Oscar nods, but it'll long be forgotten by then"

Uh, I think the Oscar nods will make it fresh in everybody's memory.

," because it's another remake/homage, and thus can't stand on its own without being compared to other war flicks."

It's neither a remake, nor an homage.

"Once again, QT is "over". "

All evidence, facts, informed opinions to the contrary.

By the way, I noticed you never responded in the other thread.

Just to remind you, you said that the studio wanted to hide that this was a QT film.

I responded with the following:

QT's name was in the trailer (you haven't seen war until you've seen it through the eyes of Quentin Tarantino)

He was on Conan (looked it up), Letterman, Kimmel, and Charlie Rose.

And he had a big article in, I believe, GQ.

They did a pretty shitty job of hiding his involvement.

comment #122

DeeZee says ...

Jonah: I said everyone as in outside analysts, not the people who actually pay for these projects. But I'm guessing that internationally, Weinco and Uni were at least expecting to break even and maybe even score the biggest revenue, since Pitt was enough to sell Troy overseas. And again, it's $50 million split profit, with, as Finke speculated, major pay-days for Pitt and QT. So at best, it's what? Twenty million in profit for another vanity project? Looks good on paper until you actually realize all the holes it has to plug up to keep both companies going for the rest of the year.

"Uh, I think the Oscar nods will make it fresh in everybody's memory. "

The same Oscars no one watches anymore to the point that they have to make it look like it's not rigged?

"It's neither a remake, nor an homage. "

Just keep telling yourself that, man.

"All evidence, facts, informed opinions to the contrary. "

The facts point to the need for a name actor to sell a niche flick which would have probably done a lot better with a no-name five years ago when QT was still relevant. And it's a niche flick which he has to pretend is action-oriented, when he didn't have to do that with Jackie Brown.

"QT's name was in the trailer (you haven't seen war until you've seen it through the eyes of Quentin Tarantino)

He was on Conan (looked it up), Letterman, Kimmel, and Charlie Rose.

And he had a big article in, I believe, GQ."

Magazine sales are on the decline, and Kimmel and Charlie Rose don't appeal to the demos needed to sell a movie like IB. Conan and Letterman probably did help, but those shows still revolved in some way around Pitt. Would not happen in the old days. And as you yourself said, QT's name was near the middle of the trailer, not the beginning.

comment #123

dontlookback says ...

It's amazing how DeeZee's presence can turn one of the better movie news sites into one of the absolute worst upon closer inspection. Is there a way for me to block his posts, if only from my own view? I honestly have never seen someone who knows less about a topic spend more time proving this to be true. It's really an unpleasant, unbearable thing. Jeff, I'm begging you (and even in doing this I know I run the risk of being banned myself)...

comment #124

Jonah says ...

"I said everyone as in outside analysts, not the people who actually pay for these projects. "

No, you said everyone except for a couple of HE readers, including me.

The rest of your first paragraph wasn't relevant, so I won't respond to any of that.

"The same Oscars no one watches anymore to the point that they have to make it look like it's not rigged? "

People still watch the show, and hear about it. If popular movies get nominated more people will watch. IB is a popular movie.

"It's neither a remake, nor an homage. "

Just keep telling yourself that, man."

Until you PROVE otherwise.

"The facts point to the need for a name actor to sell a niche flick which would have probably done a lot better with a no-name five years ago when QT was still relevant. And it's a niche flick which he has to pretend is action-oriented, when he didn't have to do that with Jackie Brown. "

Spielberg casts Tom Cruise for a reason. Because he helps with box office. If movie stars weren't needed to help sell a film, they wouldn't get paid 20 million dollars.

I don't even think you understand what niche means.

"Magazine sales are on the decline"

Doesn't matter. Not relevant. If they wanted him hidden, they wouldn't have let him do the interview.

", and Kimmel and Charlie Rose don't appeal to the demos needed to sell a movie like IB."

I disagree.

" Conan and Letterman probably did help, but those shows still revolved in some way around Pitt. "

First of all, we aren't talking about whether or not the appearances helped. We're talking about how you said the studios wanted to hide QT's involvement.

Second, how did they revolve around Pitt? Give me specific details to prove you aren't lying.

" And as you yourself said, QT's name was near the middle of the trailer, not the beginning. "

That means nothing. It wasn't even in the middle, it was closer to the beginning.

But either way, are audiences unable to see his name if it's closer to the middle than the beginning? Nope. Again, the studio wanted you to know this was a QT film. The audience knew it. And they made the film a hit.

You're losing badly, son.

comment #125

DeeZee says ...

Jonah: "No, you said everyone except for a couple of HE readers, including me."

Well, the way Harvey was going about it, he definitely didn't seem phased, so I guess he's also excluded.

"If popular movies get nominated more people will watch."

Except IB isn't popular. It's already been forgotten two weeks later like that PG-13 war movie. They were milkin' Kill Bill two years later with the use of that Battle w/o Honor + Humanity song in a car commercial.

"Until you PROVE otherwise. "

The guy called it a Dirty Dozen-type flick and makes allusions to actors and genres of that era.

"Spielberg casts Tom Cruise for a reason. Because he helps with box office. If movie stars weren't needed to help sell a film, they wouldn't get paid 20 million dollars."

But you're basically supporting my argument, then-that Spielberg and QT don't have the same name-power which might have been the case in the past.

"I don't even think you understand what niche means. "

Huh? You mean people actually flock to WW2 movies which don't revolve around Matt Damon or a love triangle? News to me.

"If they wanted him hidden, they wouldn't have let him do the interview."

They let him do the interview, because no one pays for magazines anymore, anyway.

"I disagree."

Please. Kimmel's the guy people watch when there's no one good on the Tonight Show and Letterman. And Charlie Rose is for people who watch PBS in general; and we all know that American Idol crap is likely to get more views.

"Second, how did they revolve around Pitt? Give me specific details to prove you aren't lying. "

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upFd2KJd5z8

From http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=conan+o%27brien+Tarantino&aq=f&aqi=&oq=&fp=ee36edbd3c16a1c5 part I:

"Quentin talks about getting Brad Pitt to do his movie, and visiting a Tarantino bar!"

"It wasn't even in the middle, it was closer to the beginning. "

That's not what you were saying earlier. Which is it? I can play that same game, too.

"Again, the studio wanted you to know this was a QT film. The audience knew it. And they made the film a hit."

The studio wanted to let you know it was a war film from QT, as opposed to a QT film. There is a difference. And the audience made the film a hit, because they heard those tea-baggers use nazi analogies to Obama; and they either agreed, or didn't know shit about their history, and used the flick as a "Cliff notes" reference. But, again, if you're going to say that QT made a difference, then his name should've saved Grindhouse.

comment #126

Jonah says ...

"Well, the way Harvey was going about it, he definitely didn't seem phased, so I guess he's also excluded. "

This isn't even relevant.

"Except IB isn't popular. It's already been forgotten two weeks later like that PG-13 war movie. They were milkin' Kill Bill two years later with the use of that Battle w/o Honor + Humanity song in a car commercial."

It's popular. And quit doing shit like " that PG-13 war movie". It's not clever. It's annoying. And IB is popular.

"The guy called it a Dirty Dozen-type flick and makes allusions to actors and genres of that era. "

Yeah, it's not an homage or a remake.

"But you're basically supporting my argument, then-that Spielberg and QT don't have the same name-power which might have been the case in the past. "

Actually I'm not. Of course Pitt helps the movie. But not enough to make it a hit. How many 100 million dollar hits has Pitt had where he was the main actor? Only a couple.

"Huh? You mean people actually flock to WW2 movies which don't revolve around Matt Damon or a love triangle? News to me. "

Matt Damon? You really don't understand what niche means.

"They let him do the interview, because no one pays for magazines anymore, anyway."

Prove that's why they let him do it. PROVE it.

""Please. Kimmel's the guy people watch when there's no one good on the Tonight Show and Letterman. And Charlie Rose is for people who watch PBS in general; and we all know that American Idol crap is likely to get more views."

Kimmel is on later than either of those shows. It's strange that so many major filmmakers go on Charlie Rose if it doesn't help the movies. Seems like a waste of time.

"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upFd2KJd5z8

From http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=conan+o%27brien+Tarantino&aq=f&aqi=&oq=&fp=ee36edbd3c16a1c5 part I: "

I'm not going to watch those. YOU tell me how they revolved around Pitt. If they simply talked about Pitt for a minute, that's not enough.

"That's not what you were saying earlier. Which is it? I can play that same game, too."

you do that all the time.

"The studio wanted to let you know it was a war film from QT, "

Thank you. So you admit I'm right.

"But, again, if you're going to say that QT made a difference, then his name should've saved Grindhouse. "

No. No matter who you are, or how popular you are, not every movie will be a hit. Adam Sandler is usually extremely popular but even he has his duds.

The fact that you don't understand things like this is not surprising at all.

Thank you for admitting I was right.

comment #127

JimH says ...

All you Juno haters:

Juno made $231,411,584 worldwide on repeat viewings. Had a rating of B+ on Box Office Mojo.

You would seem to be a tiny vocal minority who get off on being outsider critics. I feel sorry for you.

comment #128

DeeZee says ...

Jonah: "Of course Pitt helps the movie. But not enough to make it a hit. How many 100 million dollar hits has Pitt had where he was the main actor?"

Enough to make a difference.

"And IB is popular."

It's so popular that people already moved on to 9.

"Yeah, it's not an homage or a remake. "

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=Quentin+Tarantino+basterds+homage&aq=f&aqi=&oq=&fp=ee36edbd3c16a1c5

"Prove that's why they let him do it. PROVE it."

You think they'd let a guy with that ugly a mug do a cover on GQ in the past? Hell, no. But sales are so bad across the board that they'll slip anyone in there, even if it means movie geeks who normally avoid that shit precisely because of how the handsome male celebrities make them feel as inadequate as attractive women celebrities on women's mags do to female readers. Under different circumstances, it'd definitely be Pitt, and not QT, on there.

"Matt Damon? You really don't understand what niche means. "

I do know IB is as niche as Thin Red Line.

"It's strange that so many major filmmakers go on Charlie Rose if it doesn't help the movies. Seems like a waste of time. "

It probably is a waste of time, but they're not doing it for the exposure. They're doing it to discuss the stuff they probably would have to keep short on network tv.

"If they simply talked about Pitt for a minute, that's not enough."

They talked about him for at least two minutes on Dave.

"So you admit I'm right."

No, I emphasized war film, not QT.

"No matter who you are, or how popular you are, not every movie will be a hit. Adam Sandler is usually extremely popular but even he has his duds."

Yes, but Sandler movies usually flop when they're different from his usual shit, while Death Proof was typical QT.

Jim: Emmerich movies make that kind of money, too.

comment #129

Jonah says ...

"Enough to make a difference."

Nope.

"It's so popular that people already moved on to 9."

People always move on. IB is still popular.

"You think they'd let a guy with that ugly a mug do a cover on GQ in the past? Hell, no. But sales are so bad across the board that they'll slip anyone in there, even if it means movie geeks who normally avoid that shit precisely because of how the handsome male celebrities make them feel as inadequate as attractive women celebrities on women's mags do to female readers. Under different circumstances, it'd definitely be Pitt, and not QT, on there. "

No. I said prove it. You didn't prove it.

"I do know IB is as niche as Thin Red Line. "

Neither one is niche.

"It probably is a waste of time, but they're not doing it for the exposure. They're doing it to discuss the stuff they probably would have to keep short on network tv."

Prove it.

"They talked about him for at least two minutes on Dave."

What does that prove? Nothing.

"No, I emphasized war film, not QT."

No, you slipped up but you definitely admitted that I was right.

"Yes, but Sandler movies usually flop when they're different from his usual shit, while Death Proof was typical QT."

No, even a few of his regular films have flopped. And Death Proof wasn't typical QT. Only his die hard fans went to see it because the experience was so strange. The cross over audience wasn't interested in a three hour experience on bad film with fake trailers in the middle. His core audience went to see it.

Now everybody is back, for a movie that has made over 200 million worldwide.

It's a huge hit, has far surpassed what you thought it would do, and will make more on DVD especially if it gets even a couple of oscar noms.

You're really bad at this.

comment #130

willis says ...

Megan Fox.. She is sexy and quite beautiful. But I don;t like that kind of facial character. free advertising |jobs|bathroom furniture

comment #131

Tania Yoga says ...

Well, she is just to cheap. That is not a kind of face who can go popular without exposing sex. We all have seen this in years. Yet men love her!

Tania,
mexican blanketsnd

comment #132

diamond says ...

That is her! Well, I actually like watching her acts in Transformers. But not that much anymore. You just soon get bored of this hot woman. fake diamond

comment #133

Sport lover says ...

Never mind, because it is so easy to get publication and attention. Just expose what you have lol,. No much talent is needed. Sports & Bodybuilding Supplements |Exercise Fitness |Sports Supplements

comment #134

Web Company says ...

That is the image she has been trying to buy so far. Let it be. I don't like anyway, just appreciate what one chooses in life. web design company

comment #135

MerryC says ...

If you think she is sexy, I would say this woman is disgusting. Look at her face character and smile, that is just too cheap to be a celebrity. sex shop

comment #136

CattyList says ...

I love Megan Fox. But I have been more curious since I heard about the rumors whether she is a man or not, lol.. New Parent List

comment #137

Debritto says ...

Cool.. I understand how she does it that way. It is easy to be popular when you have beautiful face and publish such hot poses. fireproof safe

comment #138

Karenina says ...

In my country, especially in the entertainment industry, any sexy and young girl can just be popular in time. There is no need talent to make guys turn on. And after all, I don't like Megan Fox. gay travel

comment #139

HoustonEstate says ...

Megan Fox is beautiful. But I don't like her, not at all. Her face is just too common for a Hollywood celebrity.

Mandy - Houston real estate

comment #140

Ocala Law says ...

She is chosen as the sexiest woman in the world again this year. I hope there were fresh celebrities, with fresh face and talents, lol.. But it's fine. Ocala Divorce law

comment #141

CandySun says ...

Megan Fox is really the hottest around the world. I do not understand why people don't like her, or why they think she is a man. She is not, lol.. Sunglasses

comment #142

MonyChair says ...

Okay, she is beautiful. But I don't think she is one of the woman with classical and classy look like Nicole Kidman. She is just the same among the many, hair loss surgery

comment #143

NaplesEstate says ...

That is how popularity grows. And that is also why most people with good physical appearance will just be able to try their luck. Naples Real Estate |Naples Florida Homes For Sale|MLS Search Naples

comment #144

FreeImage says ...

I understand the mechanism a bit now, lol.. Why is she the sexiest woman in the world? Of course men would just agree when they are allowed to see that much. free image hosting |Free Web Hosting|Free Hosting Directory

comment #145

SherrylStar says ...

That is just presumable. I don't like Megan Fox, even though I know she is beautiful and hot. gun safes

comment #146

LynEscorts says ...

For sure. After all, we know that is the shortcut to be popular, much more than you were before, just in time. There is something that make me dislike Megan Fox. London Escorts

comment #147

LunaMaya says ...

I love Megan Fox. She is so sexy and straightforward. There is no wonder why she can be the sexiest women in the world! Keep up the fame! Poker Calculator

comment #148

Wisconsin says ...

Anyway she is too wild for the award, lol. I think I would prefer a more elegant and exceptional celebrity to be on the show. Let's just see later. Wisconsin Lake Property

comment #149

sammy555 says ...

Very Preety lady no doubt, she should show more modesty I think

solve
sudoku

comment #150

construction says ...

She is too hot to be out of the nomination. Megan Fox.. No wonder she is the hottest woman of choice. Good luck! construction companies

comment #151

carissa says ...

She can be popular in anywhere around the world with the 'talent". How can men not get exited with that figure, lol.. High blood sugar |Lower high blood sugar levels |Ways to lower high blood sugar levels |Naturally lower high blood sugar |Lower blood sugar naturally

comment #152

MonaRatuliu says ...

Megan Fox is so sexy and hot. I like her actions too, especially in the last version of Transformer. Good luck! Salehoo

comment #153

Xolenta says ...

Good job.. It is easy to impose on popularity to be even more published on media. Megan Fox does it right! Wall safes

comment #154

MayMay says ...

It is time for her to be more low profile. I don't like Megan Fox. Anyway, I heard about her causing chaos in big Hotels in the country, are they true?

comment #155

badpete says ...

Megan Fox wasnt so beautiful before her facial plastic surgery!

lanzarote holidays

comment #156

YaleLocks says ...

Megan Fox is just like the standard celebrity who imposes mostly on physical appearance. I don;t think she has something special to be proud of.

James - Window Locks

comment #157

badpete says ...

who is showing her tits? lol

internet security

comment #158

badpete says ...

That is her! Well, I actually like watching her acts in Transformers. But not that much anymore. You just soon get bored of this hot woman

free driver scanner

comment #159

GreenGlue says ...

She is always been reported about such gossips. What about the one about whether she is a man or not? I hope she is! resilient sound clips

comment #160

AutoInsurance says ...

Wow, Megan Fox. I don't realize how beautiful she is until I watched her in the last Transformer. But still, she is not my type at all..auto insurance

comment #161

badpete says ...

I hope Wells didn't leave his laptop sitting on a cafe table whilst going for a whizz. We need TIFF reports.

watch movies online

comment #162

badpete says ...

JENNIFER'S BODY sounds a hell of a lot more realistic than JUNO.

Anyway, let's take up a collection to send LexG to film school.

korea fashion

comment #163

badpete says ...

All horror movies should strive for "Basic Instinct" sexy. lol! cheers!!!!

Business Lists

comment #164

GarageDoor says ...

Megan Fox is one of my favorite. It is fine when you see she is hot, sexy, or whatever, but I think her acting is great.

Matt D.
Garage Doors Liverpool

comment #165

badpete says ...

Well, ok, if people are stupid enough to make Good Luck Chuck a hit, I guess JB could actually do that well.

Lyrics

comment #166

Profiles says ...

Rent Cheap Apartments |Mesa Foreclosed Homes |Foreclosed Homes |Seattle Apartments |Cheap New York City Apartments |Bank Homes |Phoenix Apartments |Apartments For Rent |Bank Properties |Cheap Studio Apartments |Cheap Apartments |Columbus Studio Apartments |Buy Foreclosures in Kansas City |Houston Foreclosed Homes |Owner Financing Sale

comment #167

Fashion222 says ...

I think Megan Fox is one of the celebrities that exploit sex more than talent. If you are a fan or if you are one of the voters for "The Sexiest Woman in the World" nomination, it's fine. This is just my personal opinion. Or maybe because I am not a male to realize her passion.

Rayne C. - Wholesale Korean Clothing

comment #168

badpete says ...

"It's strange that so many major filmmakers go on Charlie Rose if it doesn't help the movies. Seems like a waste of time. "

online fax service

comment #169

badpete says ...

That is her! Well, I actually like watching her acts in Transformers. But not that much anymore. You just soon get bored of this hot woman

hk fashion

comment #170

badpete says ...

I cannot believe that this topic generated 138 comments. Now . . . .139.

free movies online

comment #171

Online says ...

Megan Fox is just like other celebrities. I agree that she is beautiful and hot. But there is nothing special to remember from her.
Online Casino

comment #172

warranty says ...

I watched her movies, all the movies, lol.. She is always that great and engaging. Good luck for the career...! auto extended warranty

comment #173

Beats says ...

Well, lets see how good she will be doing that. I think Megan Fox is not that stunning at all. sell your beats

comment #174

badpete says ...

Only a woman who is jealous of Megan Fox's looks would want Megan Fox to lose her hotness.

voip service

comment #175

Invitation says ...

She again! I think I have been bored hearing her names, lol.. You know what of attribute that supports her popularity. Baby Shower Invitations

comment #176

badpete says ...

Just saw the midnight screening at TIFF, and what an awful movie. Aside from the occasional diablo Cody line, there's nothing redeeming in this, except maybe the girls kissing.

Living Room Furniture

comment #177

badpete says ...

Considering Jason Reitman made the excellent Thank You For Smoking and the apparently excellent Up in the Air, I think he deserves more credit for Juno's success than Diablo's cloying script.

best driver software

comment #178

BocaRaton says ...

I don;t know what is wrong with Megan Fox and many other celebrities. They are just too explosive for a public figure. Ir they dun care at all? Fort Lauderdale Website Design

comment #179

NewZealand says ...

It is true, and it is the best way to gain instant popularity. That why i should rethink whether I like or dislike her. New Zealand Online Pharmacy

comment #180

Auction says ...

Well, she should have been so successful with the exposure. I call it opportunity cost if she does not impose on her sexual attraction to gain that, lol.. Find Auctioneers

comment #181

badpete says ...

It's fun to bag on it now, but I remember seeing "Basic Instinct" when it came out, and that movie was sexy as hell. I specifically remember at the night club when Sharon's dirty dancing with her sometimes-girlfriend Roxy.

Music Lyrics

comment #182

josecito says ...

I watched her movies, all the movies, lol.. She is always beautiful , well I wanna watch a movie and play poker
Thanks for the information.!

comment #183

doublexjohn says ...

Well, she is just to cheap. That is not a kind of face who can go popular without exposing sex. We all have seen this in years. Yet men love her!

Furniture

comment #184

badpete says ...

Jonah: Even with P+A, 'Chuck is probably low-budget enough to be lucrative, while IB is pricey enough to actually end up making less than one "volume" of Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction, even with the larger audience.

free phone call voip

comment #185

adminjobs says ...

She deserves all the popularity though, especially after the sensational things she has been doing. Good luck!
Jobs - Admin Jobs - Sales Jobs - Office Jobs - Management Jobs

comment #186

atish says ...

Good job.

free internet fax service

comment #187

flyfishing says ...

It is okay. We have to appreciate everyone's effort after all. Hope she is doing good with the career. fly fishing

comment #188

Employment says ...

Finally, I would just say that she is free to do whatever she loves to. We just judge whether to support or not. And then keep quiet.. Employee Screening

comment #189

Rap Beats says ...

Haha yea, Jennifer Fox - while sexy as sin she cannot act. She actually said she didn't like being in Transformers because there was no "real acting" involved....then she goes and stars in Jennifers Body - but she gets places with her looks...good for her buy beats

comment #190

Raden Beletz says ...

Nice information, valuable and excellent design, as share good stuff with good ideas and concepts, lots of great information and inspiration, both of which we all need, thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer such helpful information here.

Festival Museum Nusantara.
Kontes SEO bisnis syariah online produk herbal PT. Exer Indonesia rekomendasi MUI.
Peluang Usaha Ahasu Gnaulep.
Aku Cuma Seorang Blogger Yang Cinta Seo

comment #191

gm0nk3y says ...

get paid to upload get paid to upload files how to get paid to upload videos get paid to upload files
get paid to
get paid to upload

comment #192

arentin says ...

Great post nice info, thank you for post it

Cerita Campur Aduk Arentin

comment #193

draxc0la says ...

Talk Online Business|Blogging for Business|Internet Marketing|Healthy and Lifestyle|Online Games|Anxiety|Blogging|Profit|Business Planning|Info Tech Gadget|Finance Insurance|GPS Techno Gadget|GPS|Home Improvement|Lates Technology and Gadget
starting a new business
small business planning
starting an online business
promotion marketing
branding for business
business analysis
risk management in business
search engine marketing
business marketing plan
business management