"Oscar pundits are going 10-slot crazy this year, wondering whether the additional spots will go to the multiplex or to the art house," writes the Hollywood Reporter's Stephen Zeitchik.
"Whatever answers emerge, it's clear that with an expanded field, voters will have to make tougher choices than usual -- if not when mentally filling out their list of 10, then when they start anointing movies from among that list. With the widened field, there's a wider split between the feel-good contenders and the downbeat ones, between movies that depict the world as it is and those that show the world as we wish it to be."
Zeitchik then startled me cold by suggesting that The Hangover might be one of the ten Best Picture contenders.
Voters, he says, "will have to choose between the story of an inner-city girl whose stepfather has repeatedly raped her and an old man who takes a magical, life-affirming balloon ride. They'll have to decide between a group of male bomb-defusers drawn to the nightmare of the battlefield and a group of male friends drawn hilariously to the escapism of Vegas."
Just a minute, hold on....Zeitchik has mentioned The Hurt Locker and The Hangover in the same Oscar-prognosticating sentence? Is the world coming to an end? Is it 2012 out there, causing Zeitchik to freak out and lose touch with his usually reliable perceptions?
"This choice won't simply be a cultural statement," he adds. "It's no accident that, as the studio specialty business withers away, nearly all the downbeat contenders (Precious, Bright Star, The Hurt Locker) were made outside the studio system, while almost all those celebrating life's aspirational side (Up, Star Trek, The Hangover, Invictus) were made within it."
Star Trek? A nifty, neato zing-ding summer flick but a Best Picture contender? In what planetary system?
There's something dark and malignant about a world in which reasonable professionals suggest that The Hangover and Star Trek might really and truly be serious Best Picture contenders while at the same time barely acknowledging the pristine perfection and world-class comedic gloom that A Serious Man divvies out in spades. There must be something in the air or the water. Some kind of mad swine flu of the mind.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on October 26, 2009 at 9:28 AM
comment #1
Rich S.
says ...
The additional 5 spots were added solely to draw the Eloi to the televised awards ceremony. I'm surprised they don't just pick the five biggest box office winners of the year and make them the additional five. And the nominees are, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen....
Posted by Rich S.
at October 26, 2009 10:21 AM
comment #2
actionman
says ...
A Serious Man better make the final 10. Something tells me it's too small and that it came out too early but after watching it yesterday it's been tough to think about anything else. Total brilliance, as usual, from the Coen brothers.
Posted by actionman
at October 26, 2009 11:11 AM
comment #3
BurmaShave
says ...
I would imagine STAR TREK is exactly the kind of movie the additional five slots were created for. DISTRICT 9 would be a better choice, it made less money but it was much more zeitgeisty this summer. THE HANGOVER, as well made as it was for that type of thing, is a reallly insane suggestion.
Posted by BurmaShave
at October 26, 2009 12:05 PM
comment #4
BurmaShave
says ...
A SERIOUS MAN will probably benefit from the additional slots. Under normal circumstances it'd have had a tough time, even in the '70s. But I wouldn't worry about its chances this year. Not to be cynical but remember how many Academy voters are probably lapsed, drifting or skeptical Jews very much on the movie's wavelength.
Posted by BurmaShave
at October 26, 2009 12:08 PM
comment #5
BurmaShave
says ...
Last thing I'll say, when you fight so hard against one of the ten best films of the year (INGLORIOUS) getting a slot, in your ideal Tarantino free lineup, who benefits? Probably something just as if not more commercial.
Posted by BurmaShave
at October 26, 2009 12:09 PM
comment #6
Howlingman
says ...
Having 10 Best Picture slots guarantees there'll be twice the usual amount of bitching about what gets nominated and what doesn't. It's the Oscars -- who cares?
Posted by Howlingman
at October 26, 2009 12:40 PM
comment #7
Scott Nye
says ...
Inglourious Basterds and Up will bring in whatever audience they could possibly hope for. I will say that I'm much more in favor of The Hangover being nominated than Star Trek. At least the former had an decent script and director who put some amount of thought into how the thing looked.
Posted by Scott Nye
at October 26, 2009 3:09 PM
comment #8
Markj74
says ...
Star Trek's script was atrocious and the direction was TV-level. If it gains a Best Picture nod the world has gone mad.
Posted by Markj74
at October 26, 2009 3:13 PM
comment #9
Markj74
says ...
Avatar would take Star Trek's place in the list of 10 nominees, has anybody seen that new trailer? Wow!
Posted by Markj74
at October 26, 2009 3:15 PM
comment #10
BurmaShave
says ...
No I haven't seen the AVATAR trailer, why should a trailer be easily available for viewing.
Posted by BurmaShave
at October 26, 2009 5:11 PM