March 12
The Exploding Girl
SuicideGirls Must Die!
Tapes from the Script
March 17
Richard Kelly's The Box, which opens today, was shooting in the Boston area two years ago; that in itself should tell you it has problems. The failing-grade RT reviews (44% hoi-polloi, 25% creme de la creme) are another. It's Friday morning and the film is all but dead in the water -- let's face it. WB marketers knew it was a ruptured duck ages ago; that's one reason why they took so long to open it.
So why did Media Rights Capital agree to fund the film after reading Kelly's script? They had to know he's not McG or Michael Bay, that his rep is that of a fringe-type guy who caught a wave off the video sales of Donnie Darko, and that he tends to make trippy head-bender flicks with labrynthian, multi-layered plots -- any film geek could have told them that.
So there was no way he was going to make a quietly creepy, less-is-more, Ingmar Bergmanesque thriller out of the simple 1970 Richard Matheson short story that later became a Twilight Zone episode in the mid '80s. (Which is what I would have preferred.) They had to know Kelly would take the story into the outer stratosphere. They also had to know that no matter what they may say in production meetings, brainy cult directors don't make films for the Eloi.
The main problem, to go by just about every review, is that Kelly took a simple premise (if you could get rich by pushing a button that will cause a total stranger's death, would you push it?) and loaded it down with waay too many oddball tangents and byzantine plot elements and metaphorical layers. In other words, he did exactly what any semi-aware, semi-comatose Media Rights Capital execs could have easily predicted would have happened when the project was green-lighted in early '07.
I love Kelly's stuff myself but he's not "box office" -- even his friends agree he's not that. He's off on his own beam. The problem with Kelly isn't what he writes or directs; it's the fact that the budgets for his films so far haven't been set as realistically proportionate.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on November 6, 2009 at 9:26 AM
comment #1
actionman
says ...
I have read plenty of reviews that suggest that The Box is a fun, trippy, totally preposterous movie that works if you're in the mood for this sort of asinine thriller. I'll be Netflixing this one.
Posted by actionman
at November 6, 2009 10:28 AM
comment #2
CitizenKanedforChewingGum
says ...
I hate to say it (because he's possibly got a few good future movies left in him), but this may already be the end of Kelly. I know it seems way early for a career obituary (esp. given his age), but if this puppy tanks after Southland Tales super-tanked, I don't know where he goes from here.
Helming direct-to-video sequels?
Assistant director on big projects?
Porn auteur?
All of the above?
It's been a very strange run for him thus far, and -- for better or worse -- I get the distinct feeling he's just going to promptly disappear into the Hollywood ether.
Posted by CitizenKanedforChewingGum
at November 6, 2009 10:32 AM
comment #3
Mark
says ...
So Langella shows the million during the initial proposal? Just press the button right then and there, and usher him out of your house sans suitcase. End of story. What's the rest of the movie even about?
Posted by Mark
at November 6, 2009 10:36 AM
comment #4
actionman
says ...
I could see him doing a bang-up job on Pirates 4. I bet he talks his way into a tentpole/franchise movie.
Posted by actionman
at November 6, 2009 10:36 AM
comment #5
Rich S.
says ...
The story, and the earlier Twilight Zone ep, are essentially just a brief, twisted joke to set up the final punch line. Even the 22 minute TZ ep felt padded. I'm shocked anyone thought they could make a 90 minute movie out of it, particularly since it sounds like they've jettisoned the punch line.
Posted by Rich S.
at November 6, 2009 10:36 AM
comment #6
lazarus
says ...
I don't even understand why this would need a high price tag. For what?
Posted by lazarus
at November 6, 2009 10:40 AM
comment #7
HarveyLime
says ...
I sincerely hope this isn't the case. I've always been a fan of Kelly's directorial efforts. Darko was a promising debut, weak on narrative but strong atmospherically. If anything, I'm a bigger fan of Southland. Messy as it may be, there's too many great aspects and moments to write it off. Watching it for a second time, it's easier to appreciate the hallucinatory madness of it all. (I particularly love the long steadicam shot in the mega zeppelin)
That said, his script to Domino was probably the worst aspect of that film; one of the greatest missed opportunities in recent memory.
Posted by HarveyLime
at November 6, 2009 10:42 AM
comment #8
Josh Massey
says ...
I would only push the button 200, 300 times tops. I'm not a monster.
Posted by Josh Massey
at November 6, 2009 10:49 AM
comment #9
Eloi Manning
says ...
Are we so sure it's going to tank? Looks like a relatively cheaply made thriller that audiences might fancy on a fairly quiet weekend. Law Abiding Citizen made money - is The Box totally doomed?
Posted by Eloi Manning
at November 6, 2009 10:49 AM
comment #10
JD
says ...
I read the script and, for better or worse, it seemed totally commercial to me. Sure, it has oddball moments/ideas, but so do most mainstream action, horror and sci-fi films.
Posted by JD
at November 6, 2009 10:51 AM
comment #11
matt cousens
says ...
Hold the phone. Why is a movie doomed if it films in or around Boston??
Posted by matt cousens
at November 6, 2009 10:54 AM
comment #12
Mark
says ...
$30M budget, right? That'll get you the first act of Zodiac.
I'm suggesting that overall, Zodiac lost a lot more money than The Box will, yet Fincher still got his Benji Button budget. Kelly's future depends on whether he continues to be able to draw talent. Actors tend to have spotty yet long memories. Terry Gilliam still gets talent, and thus budgets, even though he's given no reason for anyone to believe in him over the last decade.
Posted by Mark
at November 6, 2009 11:00 AM
comment #13
Joel
says ...
Matt, I think the problem was that they were filming two years ago, not that it was filming in Boston.
Posted by Joel
at November 6, 2009 11:00 AM
comment #14
matt cousens
says ...
You know, it seems i misread that. Looks like i was wrong. Getting overly defensive of Boston is part of what makes you from Boston, i suppose.
Posted by matt cousens
at November 6, 2009 11:03 AM
comment #15
HarveyLime
says ...
I think this will at least outdo both Men Who Stare at Goats and The Fouth Kind in the weekend haul (Christmas Carol will be the victor, without doubt).
Posted by HarveyLime
at November 6, 2009 11:06 AM
comment #16
Chase Kahn
says ...
There's no question it will do better than "The Fourth Kind" -- I've seen the trailer two times and read several news articles about it and I still don't know what the hell it is.
Posted by Chase Kahn
at November 6, 2009 11:43 AM
comment #17
btwnproductions
says ...
GOATS is awful. As for Kelly, he's far from over--maybe an HBO/SHO show?
Posted by btwnproductions
at November 6, 2009 11:52 AM
comment #18
Krazy Eyes
says ...
I'll probably catch The Box on Netflix at some point but I still haven't forgiven Kelly for Southland Tales, which is still one of the most miserable theatergoing experiences i've ever had.
Posted by Krazy Eyes
at November 6, 2009 11:56 AM
comment #19
jmevans
says ...
Jeff,
What exactly are you trying to say by your reference to it being shot in Boston? The film was destined to fail due to this fact? You do realize that "Shutter Island" and "Edge of Darkness" were also filmed in Massachusetts? The current Cruise/Diaz film "Knight & Day" is also currently shooting in Boston. So is "The Town" with Affleck and Jon Hamn. Adam Sandler's "Grown Ups" wrapped this summer.
Plymouth may be getting a huge sound stage in a few years which will mean even more movies shot in Boston/Mass. So you may want to hold off on dissing that area when it comes to a film being shot there.
Posted by jmevans
at November 6, 2009 1:22 PM
comment #20
jmevans
says ...
I'll follow up by saying that if Jeff's point was that it was being shot 2 years ago, and not the fact that it was in Boston, then I apologize.
Posted by jmevans
at November 6, 2009 1:25 PM
comment #21
Michael
says ...
I think this looks like a fun movie and a nice alternative to what is being released now (I have no interest at all to see A Christmas Carol and Precious and An Education haven't been released in my area.) I think that Richard Kelly will be able to survive this if it does turn out to be a bad movie that fails miserably, he will just have to be given an appropriate budget next time (a la Darren Arronofsky after The Fountain who then made The Wrestler.) And I agree with HarveyLime - I actually preferred Southland Tales over Donnie Darko, but I find both to be entertaining movies.
Posted by Michael
at November 6, 2009 1:53 PM
comment #22
Colin
says ...
Giving this a shot over Goats. McGregor ruins films for me and I'm sure Goats will be no different.
Posted by Colin
at November 6, 2009 2:04 PM
comment #23
DeeZee
says ...
Mark: Outside of Fight Club and Zodiac, Fincher's movies make money. And Pitt was attached, so Button would at least break even, if nothing else. And Gilliam's got good will from his legacy as a filmmaker, while Kelly is currently a one-cult hit wonder.
Posted by DeeZee
at November 6, 2009 2:07 PM
comment #24
HarveyLime
says ...
Hell, Proyas and company brought Knowing to nearly $80 million, and the reviews on that were even more savage. (granted that had somewhat weaker competition)
Posted by HarveyLime
at November 6, 2009 2:22 PM
comment #25
Eloi Manning
says ...
Goats looks like another one of those crap Clooney comedies like Leatherheads and Welcome to Collinwood. It will tank.
Posted by Eloi Manning
at November 6, 2009 2:29 PM
comment #26
Josh Massey
says ...
Jesus, you Boston guys are thin-skinned.
(Pssst - Larry Bird was way overrated).
Posted by Josh Massey
at November 6, 2009 2:39 PM
comment #27
DeeZee
says ...
Josh: Not as overrated as The Departed.
Posted by DeeZee
at November 6, 2009 4:26 PM
comment #28
Cde.
says ...
The biggest problem with this film is that it's 80% padding. Everything between the set-up and the conclusion adds little but convoluted sci-fi insanity. Some people will enjoy the crazy ride, but I found it a little flat, and very awkward to watch.
Then again...
Mark: Terry Gilliam still gets talent, and thus budgets, even though he's given no reason for anyone to believe in him over the last decade.
...I loved The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, about which many would make the same criticism.
Posted by Cde.
at November 6, 2009 5:30 PM
comment #29
JulesWinnfield
says ...
Still can't believe they got this idea from a youtube vid.
Posted by JulesWinnfield
at November 6, 2009 5:37 PM
comment #30
BanksAreForRivers
says ...
I have absolutely no faith in Richard Kelly.
He thought backing I Hope They Serve Beer In Hell would be a good idea.
I think Donnie Darko was a lucky strike. One I don't think he can replicate. And it wasn't a movie without it's problems. It worked as an under the radar cult hit, but wouldn't work any other way.
I think he's destined for television at this point. And looking at his work, that might be where he belongs.
Posted by BanksAreForRivers
at November 6, 2009 7:51 PM
comment #31
Michael
says ...
I left the theater entertained by The Box, which was all I was hoping for. It was a fun, strange ride and it never bored me once. Not the best movie of the year, but a lot better than I was expecting. Richard Kelly showed a lot more restraint than Southland Tales led me to believe he had the capability of showing. Of course, that means he showed very little restraint at all, but it was a lot better contained than Southland Tales.
Posted by Michael
at November 6, 2009 9:33 PM
comment #32
raquelswell
says ...
The way Kelly expresses himself is completely at odds with being known as someone who makes trippy movies. I know it shouldn't matter but I can't ignore the lack of a distinguishing personality. He tries hard to set himself apart from other young directors/writers but I don't think he has what it takes to just make a movie, much less a trippy one.
Posted by raquelswell
at November 6, 2009 9:42 PM
comment #33
Gordon27
says ...
"Terry Gilliam still gets talent, and thus budgets, even though he's given no reason for anyone to believe in him over the last decade."
I like Richard Kelly, but Terry Gilliam has (1) Monty Python based good will, (2) several successful movies, and (3) gotten multiple actors Academy Award nominations. And Fincher has two of those as well.
The Aronofsky comparison is apt -- Kelly needs to do something like 'The Wrestler'. But I don't think he's got it in him.
Posted by Gordon27
at November 6, 2009 10:34 PM
comment #34
A Facebook User
says ...
This will do good business on DVD/BR, I bet.
Posted by A Facebook User
at November 7, 2009 12:01 AM
comment #35
drbob
says ...
I know he aspires to be a brainy cult director, but I don't know if he belongs in the club yet. Kelly's best film, Donnie Darko, is practically a loose remake of Jacob's Ladder. And, Andrian Lynn is no art house auteur.
Posted by drbob
at November 7, 2009 10:20 AM
comment #36
DeafEars
says ...
I thought DONNIE DARKO was pretty good, but it's starting to look like Kelly, like M. Night Shammalammadingdong, should probably consider directing a film that he doesn't write. Both have a real knack for atmosphere and building tension - M. Night, when he's cooking, is almost Lynch's equal at these things - but they've both been hobbled by the terrible scripts they've written for themselves.
Posted by DeafEars
at November 7, 2009 11:24 AM
comment #37
kamichojin
says ...
I'll give the Box a chance based on the good will I have for Kelly due to the theatrical version of Donnie Darko & Southland Tales. Southland was a deeply flawed film but there are moments that really work brilliantly. If he had someone to rein him in, it might have been more than an ambitious failure. The biggest reservations I have about Kelly come from the "Director's Cut" of Donnie Darko he released a few years ago. Complete ruination of everything that worked in the original.
Posted by kamichojin
at November 7, 2009 3:21 PM
comment #38
Doug Pratt
says ...
Michael Cimino for a new generation
Posted by Doug Pratt
at November 7, 2009 4:44 PM
Post a comment