I finally got a chance last night to watch that DVD I was handed of Kenneth Lonergan's Margaret, and I now completely understand and agree with the rave notices it's been getting. New Yorkers are urged to see it at the Cinema Village, where it'll be as of Friday, 12.23.
It's a bit lumpy and awkward here and there (although not as much as I'd been led to believe) and perhaps a wee bit too long, but Margaret -- shot in '05 and stuck in some kind of post-production indecision and lawsuit hell for five years after that -- is smart and brave and ambitious, and made of the passionate stuff that matters.
It's a Manhattan-set moral tale, occuring a year or so after 9/11, about a curious, somewhat bullheaded, occasionally agitated teen named Lisa Cohen (a fierce and emotionally brazen Anna Paquin), and the different ways her life is stirred and churned up as a result of her having been at least partly responsible for a fatal bus accident.
It's clearly the fault of the bus driver (Mark Ruffalo), but Lisa, not wanting to destroy the driver's ability to care for his family, lies to the cops about the circumstances, telling them that the victim (Allison Janey) crossed against a red light. But then she has an attack of conscience and hooks up with Janey's best friend (Jeannie Berlin, giving a tangy, abrasive performance) about a possible civil lawsuit against the MTA. This leads to scenes with investigators and lawyers with a side benefit of three standout supporting performances from Stephen Adly Guirgis, Michael Ealy and Jonathan Hadary. Subplots involving sex and boyfriends and teachers and a mother conflict are threaded in and result in a kind of catch-as-catch-can tapestry deal.
Lisa's actress mother is played by J. Smith-Cameron, and her boyfriend, a well-mannered European with an anti-Semitic undercurrent, is portrayed by Jean Reno.
Good and believable supporting performances also come from Matt Damon, Rosemarie DeWitt, Lonergan himself (as Lisa's dad), Matthew Broderick and Kieran Culkin.
Is each and every Margaret moment successful? No, but most of them are. On top of which I'd much rather watch a hit-and-misser with some truly alive portions and maybe two or three so-so moments than a polished but consistently mediocre middlebrow thing.

Fox Searchlight opened and closed Margaret last September, and then along came efforts a month ago (prinicipally Jaime Christley's Margaret peitition) to persuade FS to re-issue it or at least provide screeners. And now, to repeat, the comes a new booking at Manhattan's Cinema Village on Friday, 12.23.
Shame on those Rotten Tomatoes critics who called it a "mess" and a "sophomore slump" film, etc. Agreed, it doesn't move along at a crisp pace with the usual smooth assurance, etc. But it's so smart and searching and penetrating in so many ways great and small that the stylistic, cosmetic stuff shouldn't matter. Would these same critics have dismissed On The Waterfront if it was too long and had been clumsily edited with one or two needless subplots, even with the classic stuff intact? If a film has really good material then it has really good material, and a good critic should always point that out, even if there are structural issues here and there.
The only thing that doesn't quite work in the beginning is the fact that Ruffalo's bus driver is wearing a cowboy hat (which no real-life MTA operator would ever be caught dead with on the job) as well as the cutting of the accident scene. There's also a sex-with-Damon scene followed by Paquin going up to Damon and a woman colleague and saying she's getting an abortion. Lonergan could have lost those two scenes with no harm to the film or Pacquin's performance or anything.
The Margaret title alludes to a young woman described in a Gerard Manley Hopkins poem called "Spring and Fall: To a Young Child." The poem, which is about facing up to the inevitable losses and ruinations of life, is read aloud during Lisa's drama (or English literature) class by Broderick's teacher character.
"Now no matter, child, the name:
Sorrow's spríngs are the same.
Nor mouth had, no nor mind, expressed
What heart heard of, ghost guessed:
It ís the blight man was born for,
It is Margaret you mourn for."
Posted by Jeffrey Wells on December 21, 2011 at 9:42 AM
comment #1
A Pop Calypso
says ...
yer front page html is all screwed up JW.
Posted by A Pop Calypso
at December 21, 2011 9:48 AM
comment #2
Jeffrey Wells
says ...
No, it;s fine...fixed.
Posted by Jeffrey Wells
at December 21, 2011 9:59 AM
comment #3
Gabe@ThePlaylist
says ...
Disappointed you had nothing to say about super smoothie Jean Reno! His, ahem, final moments are a riot, the funniest stuff in an otherwise intense film.
Posted by Gabe@ThePlaylist
at December 21, 2011 10:17 AM
comment #4
LexG
says ...
I'm destined to never see this before video, but I'm super fascinated by the whole overlong-2.5 hours deal...
Does it play like MEET JOE BLACK, with lots of obvious beats and long entrances that could've been cut out? EYES WIDE SHUT kind of plays like that, too-- I sort of love that pacing, that enervating entrance/exit long-pause dead-air kind of endurance test that aggravates audiences. It can be deadly with a packed house, but I like the perversity of it, of letting things play out with a surreal air of time and space stopping...
But having not seen it, maybe that's not how MARGARET rolls... But that's what it sounds like. More movies should have that lumpy pin-prick pacing.
Posted by LexG
at December 21, 2011 10:23 AM
comment #5
DeafEars
says ...
MARGARET isn't really like that - it's pretty talky with very few dead spaces between dialogue, and it doesn't play slow at all - even though some scenes are too long, I could have watched more. Plenty o' rough edges, but it's definitely on my top ten for the year. And I think it's probably one of the best portrayals on film of the teenage mentality ever.
Posted by DeafEars
at December 21, 2011 10:30 AM
comment #6
Gabe@ThePlaylist
says ...
A good 10% of Margaret is inexplicable montage where you get the feeling they shot an ENTIRE scene and just cut it out. There's one pivotal seeming coffee meeting between Paquin and Damon, and it's literally just them talking from a far distance in an establishing shot as music plays for a few seconds.
Look, I love the film, but you can obviously tell some of this editing was done by lawyers.
Posted by Gabe@ThePlaylist
at December 21, 2011 10:48 AM
comment #7
Mr. F.
says ...
Sounds like the movie could have used Spielberg behind the camera for some of his patented visual panache and styling. Or maybe Peter Jackson.
Posted by Mr. F.
at December 21, 2011 11:03 AM
comment #8
md'a
says ...
@Gabe: That quick faraway shot of Paquin and Damon talking with zero audible dialogue is exactly how it's written in the script. Seriously. Not an editing compromise at all. And that's true of many things people assume were remnants of the post-production hell.
What's actually missing are entire lengthy scenes of which there's often no hint at all in the release cut.
Posted by md'a
at December 21, 2011 11:12 AM
comment #9
Bilge Ebiri
says ...
Hey Jeff, very happy to hear that you've joined the team. One correction, though: The petition was actually created by the critic Jaime Christley.
Posted by Bilge Ebiri
at December 21, 2011 11:35 AM
comment #10
Gabriel
says ...
"There's also a sex-with-Damon scene followed by Paquin going up to Damon and a woman colleague and saying she's getting an abortion. Lonergan could have lost those two scenes with no harm to the film or Pacquin's performance or anything."
While these two scenes could have been lost without the narrative suffering much, I think their presence adds an important shading to the motif of adult characters failing to provide Lisa with any sort of useful guidance. The inevitability of their tryst (evident from their first scene together) underscores the extent to which the adults fail her.
This is easily one of the five best films I saw in 2011.
Posted by Gabriel
at December 21, 2011 12:21 PM
comment #11
berg
says ...
love the argument in the classroom too
Posted by berg
at December 21, 2011 12:53 PM
comment #12
berg
says ...
i just bought the blu ray for Midnight in Paris and the dialogue track is inaudible ... wah
Posted by berg
at December 21, 2011 1:04 PM