Academy Is Rigged Shop

Why are the Academy's Oscar nominees and winners criticized so frequently for being traditionally staid and "safe"? Why has the general Academy mentality proven so averse or oblivious to the contours and leanings of the present? We all know the answer. It's because the Academy is made up of mostly older white guys who aren't paying close attention, largely because they don't choose to because they're looking to maintain their relationships with other older white guys, and who are always looking for a job so why shake things up or otherwise rock the boat?

But all along I've been buying the line that the Academy is expanding its roster and getting younger and more inclusive. More members in their 30s and 40s, right? Jonah Hill, Tina Fey, David Gordon Green, Kristen Wiig, Judd Apatow, Seth Rogen, etc.? Well, that's mostly Academy spin, it turns out.

Because a just-published L.A.Times survey (2.19) led by John Horn, Nicole Sperling and Doug Smith reports that Oscar voters are nearly 94% Caucasian and 77% male, have a median age of 62.

And -- here's the kicker -- "people younger than 50 constitute just 14% of the membership."

"The Times found that some of the academy's 15 branches are almost exclusively white and male. Caucasians currently make up 90% or more of every academy branch except actors, whose roster is 88% white. The academy's executive branch is 98% white, as is its writers branch. Blacks are about 2% of the academy, and Latinos are less than 2%."

Your typical Academy member, in short -- the person whose whims are constantly being studied and divined by Sasha Stone, Scott Feinberg, "Safe Dave" Karger, Tom O'Neil, Kris Tapley, Stu Van Airsdale and Pete Hammond -- is a graying (or dyed-haired) guy with a paunch and a neck waddle and liver spots on his hands who doesn't work out as much as he used to, and who listened to Frankie Avalon and the Turtles and Paul Revere and the Raiders in high school, and who tends to watch comfort movies when he's home instead of Academy screeners, and who sometimes nods out at screenings.

"Men compose more than 90% of five branches, including cinematography and visual effects," the report says. "Of the academy's 43-member board of governors, six are women; public relations executive Cheryl Boone Isaacs is the sole person of color.

"The full roster of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences has never been published. Times reporters confirmed the identities of more than 5,100 Oscar voters -- more than 89% of all active voting members.

"'We absolutely recognize that we need to do a better job,' said writer-director Phil Alden Robinson, a longtime academy governor. But "we start off with one hand tied behind our back...if the industry as a whole is not doing a great job in opening up its ranks, it's very hard for us to diversify our membership."

Frank Pierson, a former academy president who won an Oscar for original screenplay for Dog Day Afternoon in 1976, said merit is the primary criterion for membership.

"I don't see any reason why the academy should represent the entire American population. That's what the People's Choice Awards are for. We represent the professional filmmakers, and if that doesn't reflect the general population, so be it."

"Some academy members, though, believe the organization should do more to reflect the demographics of the nation. Denzel Washington, who won the lead actor award for 2001's Training Day," said the academy needs to 'open it up' and 'balance' its membership.

"'If the country is 12% black, make the academy 12% black,' Washington said. 'If the nation is 15% Hispanic, make the academy 15% Hispanic. Why not?'"

I don't quite buy Washington's calculus. I think you have to demographically survey the ranks of filmmakers in the indie community and all over and determine what percentage in this group -- people who are actually trying to get features or shorts made by hook or crook -- are black and Latino and whatnot, and then you need to adjust the Academy's membership accordingly.

You can't go by the general population. There are millions upon millions of lazy, fast-food-eating couch potatoes of every ethnic stripe out there, and you can't expect their ranks to be reflected in an organization made up of determined achievers.

Posted by Jeffrey Wells on February 19, 2012 at 11:30 AM

comment #1

AnnaZed Author Profile Page says ...

In an interview with Deadline today Jonah Hill says that he is NOT an academy member:
http://www.deadline.com/2012/02/oscars-jonah-hill-moneyball/

This goes to your point. People who you would naturally think are members like Hill or Michael Cera (I have no idea if he is) or Jay Baruchel (again I have no idea if he actually is or isn't) or on the female side; Dakata Fanning (why not?) Emma Stone (I'll bet she's not) or Emma Watson or Carey Mulligan (I don't think that being nominated automatically gets you in, though it should) or Michelle Williams for that matter are not members, and that's just actors. Is Neill Blomkamp a member? I wonder.

Posted by AnnaZed Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 12:29 PM

comment #2

LexG Author Profile Page says ...

Dakota, Emma, Emma, and Carey aren't MEMBERS?

Must... not... make... joke... too... easy....

Posted by LexG Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 12:55 PM

comment #3

Gabe@ThePlaylist Author Profile Page says ...

"The fuck is PARIAH?" - The Academy.

Shit makes a lot more sense now.

Posted by Gabe@ThePlaylist Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 1:10 PM

comment #4

DuluozGray Author Profile Page says ...

Making movies is a rich man's game, and whether we like it or not, most minorities are not wealthy.

And when you're not wealthy, you can't indulge yourself and follow your dreams, you're too concerned with things like putting food on the table and keeping a roof over your head.

They don't have rich parents subsidizing their living expenses and paying for expensive universities. They don't have family members with connections that get their foot in the door.

Only children of privilege, for the most part, can afford to follow their dreams and live for years not making any kind of real money at real jobs. And that's not even taking into account the children and other close relatives of people who have already made a name for themselves in Hollywood.

As for Denzel Washington, he's out of his mind. I'd like to see the numbers. Are 12% of working directors in film black? I highly doubt it. Same with cinematographers, you just don't find women DPs for the most part, for whatever reason. You can't force these things. Someone should ask Denzel if the NBA should accurately reflect the percentage of white people in the population.

Posted by DuluozGray Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 1:49 PM

comment #5

Super Soul Author Profile Page says ...

"There are millions upon millions of lazy, fast-food-eating couch potatoes of every ethnic stripe out there"

Glenn Kenny, Jedi Master.

Posted by Super Soul Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 1:57 PM

comment #6

zumpano Author Profile Page says ...

Still doesn't explain why these "red-blooded steak-eaters" are going for the frou-frou FRENCH SILENT film with the cute little doggie that NO ONE has seen instead of the film about baseball that some people have seen.

"The Artist" seems completely at odds with this stereotype being bandied about.

Posted by zumpano Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 2:22 PM

comment #7

Chicago48 Author Profile Page says ...

And lthat's why you have the Image Awards (NAACP) and the Latino Film Awards and the Women in Film Awards.

Posted by Chicago48 Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 3:17 PM

comment #8

Gabe@ThePlaylist Author Profile Page says ...

"The Artist" is frou frou? I get the feeling most people left their monocles at home when they went to catch that one.

Posted by Gabe@ThePlaylist Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 3:52 PM

comment #9

Cadavra Author Profile Page says ...

Wotta load of rubbish. If the membership roster has never been published, how did the Times come up with these percentages?

Posted by Cadavra Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 6:44 PM

comment #10

Jeffrey Wells Author Profile Page says ...

Try reading the original article, Cadavra. They didn't make up the data.

Posted by Jeffrey Wells Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 6:52 PM

comment #11

Roger Sweets (gnosis) Author Profile Page says ...

I'll say what I've said before - just because they are white guys with a median age of 62 does not mean they are dinosaurs. The guys that made the great movies of the 70s - these guys are by and large in their 70s! Look up everybody involved with The Godfather, for instance.

It's a good idea to make sure that younger workers and more diverse workers in the industry are offered membership as soon as they have earned it. Or that an Academy member should be within 5 years of active work in the industry to keep their voting rights, perhaps. But...

Sorkin and Fincher are probably about 50 - should we bounce 'em in 10 years?

Posted by Roger Sweets (gnosis) Author Profile Page at February 19, 2012 9:32 PM

Leave a comment