…just saw Ridley Scott‘s The Dog Stars (20th Century, 8.28), which looks to me like the seventy-ninth dystopian wasteland flick we’ve been fed over the last decade or so, but at least there isn’t a gay-bear subplot featuring Nick Offerman in a bath towel.
The guy liked it, he says, because it’s not some sweeping, gargantuan, super-scaled Scott flick (it only cost $110 million…chicken feed!) and therefore felt to him like Ridley in some kind of lean, hardcore, stripped-down mode.
You want real bare-bones Ridley? Try The Counselor (’13), which only cost $25 million.
Set in rural Colorado but shot entirely in rural Italy, The Dog Stars is “basically Omega Man” with Denver vacant and gutted and overgrown and basically in ruins with most of the population dead from some kind of Covid plague.
The Dog Stars is basically a four-hander — Jacob Elordi, Josh Brolin, Margaret Qualley and Guy Pearce — plus the usual assortment of scalawags, fringe zombies, feral scavengers and blah blah. Probably Elordi’s best performance ever, he says. (JE plays a Van Morrison-loving pilot and dog owner.) Qualley plays a kind of pallid love interest, he says, but minus any hunka-chunka (although they might sexually get together down the road, he says). Brolin plays a gruff Trumpian survivalist; Pearce plays Qualley’s dad.
Is there any story tension? Not really, he said, other than Elordi somehow getting wind of a humane, harmonious community in Colorado Springs or someplace like that.
It’s filmed in IMAX, the guy says. “Tall boxy IMAX?” I asked. “I don’t know…I don’t care about that stuff,” he said. “All I know is that it filled the screen.” Except the trailer tells us that The Dog Stars is presented in 2.39:1 (standard Scope) so it doesn’t fill the fucking screen. How can you trust a guy who doesn’t know (or care to know) the difference between 1.43:1 and 1.85:1 and 2.39:1?
HE nonethless appreciates this guy having shared his impressions.











