In the original French-language shooting draft (dated 1972) of Bernardo Bertolucci and Franco Arcalli‘s Last Tango in Paris, which I scored a copy of yesterday, the beginning of the controversial sexual assault scene is described on page 97.

The scripted scene includes one of Tango‘s most famous lines, which in the finished film was spoken in English by Marlon Brando: “Go get the butter.” /p>

Brando’s character, a recently widowed hotel owner named Paul, is telling Maria Schneider‘s Jeanne to retrieve a stick of butter in the kitchen. Paul’s intent, we soon learn, is to use the butter as a lubricant in an imminent incident of back-door sexual assault. Here is a capture of page 97. Brando’s ominous line is clearly written in French: “Va chercher le beurre“

The script doesn’t describe an incident of anal penetration. It describes Paul flipping Jeanne over on her stomach and lying on top of her and holding her down, and she says with a tone of alarm, “No…no!” But it doesn’t specifically say that Paul pulls her pants down or that he enters her anus.

The person who passed along the 53-year-old Tango shooting draft (the PDF contains several notes that were hand-written by Bertolucci himself) explains as follows: “Yes, the handwritten notes [were written] by Bertolucci. This was his personal copy of the script. The controversial scene starts from page 97.

“In the script there is the butter as a prop, and also a scene of [sexual] violence that Bernardo explained to Maria Schneider and to the troupe, very accurately, before the filming began, as [an unsettling] sexual scene. This is what Vittorio Storaro told me.

“Anyway, not only that scene but much of Last Tango in Paris is an improvisation, which started from the script.

“The butter as a symbol of the family was something shared in common between Brando and Bertolucci, who both grew up in the country.”

Jessica Palud‘s Being Maria, which opens commercially on Thursday, 3.20, explores the ramifications and results of trauma visited upon poor Schneider, who died of cancer in 2011. Her troubles were due to the shooting of the infamous anal sex scene, the film seems to say, and especially due to persistent toxic reactions to that scene. The film’s main topic is the jagged relationship between Schneider, Brando and Bertolucci.

There’s a scene in which Schneider (played by Anamaria Vartolomei) states that the sexual assault scene was a Brando-Bertolucci idea that was sprung on her at the last minute — “It wasn’t scripted like that.”

“Here also is a very important French-language TV interview with Schneider, aired in 2006, in which she clearly says that she would make Last Tango in Paris again because it became part of the history of cinema.

“Schneider also says clearly that she started to take drugs because of the fame and controversy, not because of the content of Tango or that scene in particular. “She also says that the scene was not real, but played realistically. (When the butter scene controversy first broke in the mid teens, some thought it was a real rape). “You should listen to it all with someone who can translate it for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdRoJoDTfUU“

…about an apparently prevalent view that Disney’s woked-up, anti-traditional Snow White isn’t too bad or is even moderately pleasing. I wanted a howling catastrophe of some kind, but this, I’m sorry to admit, apparently isn’t in the cards.

You can’t trust the early-preview whores, of course, but I trust The Ankler‘s Richard Rushfield to some extent, and after attending last weekend’s premiere screening the worst things RR said were (a) “this might not be your cup of tea” and (b) “If you don’t want to see a family film closely based on the original story of Snow White, then Snow White probably isn’t your movie.”

Wait…what does that second quote even mean? Given what Snow White star Rachel Zegler more or less said early on (i.e., “fuck Disney’s 1937 version…we’re past that shit!…our Snow White is a leader!”), why doesn’t that sentence read “if you want to see a family film closely based on the story of Snow White, then Snow White probably isn’t your movie.” Right?

I will see Snow White at the earliest opportunity (Thursday, 3.20), and if there’s any way to honestly and fairly trash it, i will naturally do so. But only if the condemnation is earned.

What follows are not White Lotus spoilers but little dingle-daisy teasers…most of them hinted or suggested within the episode 6 trailer.

Sure enough, the brother-on-brother handjob scene happens in episode 6 (airing on Sunday, 3.23), but then you knew that. At least there will be no more whoo-boy ass-fucking reveries from Sam Rockwell….that shit has been put to bed, thank God.

Series creator Mike White decides to forsake the general bacchanalia and return to the tightening of story strands….a welcome development.

A bit more attention is paid to Jon Gries‘ Gary / Greg, the rich baldie who’s with Charlotte Le Bon‘s Chloe. We know he’s thinking about somehow icing Natasha Rothwell‘s Belinda Lindsey, the chubby spa manager who suspects his complicity in the Sicily drowning death of Jennifer Coolidge’s Tanya McQuoid.

Will Carrie Coon‘s corporate attorney be tpipped off by the Texas Trumpie wife (Leslie Bibb) that after Coon went to bed Michelle Monaghan‘s Jaclyn Lemon fucked that muscle-bound Russian guy…the guy Coon was briefly interested in?

The wimpy Asian security guy…Jesus, show a little gravitas…be a fucking man.

Back in Bangkok Rockwell, despite having given Walton Goggins a gun inside a black leather vag, wants nothing to do with Goggins zotzing that guy who allegedly murdered his dad.

Oh, and “what is it like to die?” You know which wealthy resort guest asks this question. It’s not even necessary to guess.

…because she confessed to Vanity Fair‘s Michelle Ruiz that she felt a little creeped out by the presence of Marty Supreme‘s intimacy coordinator. Because GP is 52 (born in ’72 and therefore a bit of an old schooler. Se7en is a few months shy of 30 years old, but GP’s first two films were 1991’s Shout and Hook)…obviously a bit skeptical about the kneejerk anti-male belief system that result4er in wokey #MeToo theology, Doing her part to support the general public revulsion towards wokeism….thanks, Gwynneth. Seriously. Sincere HE respect.

Last night “This Is Heavy, Doc” tried to whitewash the Being Maria / Maria Schneider saga by calling me a whitewasher and a “poisoned soul.”

HE response; “A poisoned soul”? Who’s “white-washing”? I’ve gotten into this because the legend and narrative of Maria Schneider, who passed in 2011, and the tempest that’s been generated by her #MeToo allies has been used, I feel, to unfairly trash Bernardo Bertolucci’s professional reputation.

Was Schneider not a budding actress who was hired to bring to life before cameras a young, free-spirited Parisian character named Jeanne? When Brando pretended to anally assault Jeanne in Last Tango in Paris, Schneider-the-actress naturally responded with rage and anguish. That’s what Bertolucci wanted. It’s what the Tango dynamic required.

Bertolucci stated in 2016 that the sexual assault scene wasn’t a surprise as it was scripted. This is what I may or may not be able to verify by thoroughly reading and correctly translating the 1972 French-language Tango shooting script that yesterday arrived in my inbox.

The only surprise on the day of shooting, Bertolucci said nine years ago, was a decision to use butter as a lubricant.

Was it professionally unkind and disrespectful of Bertolucci and Brando to not invite Schneider into their small creative circle as the scene was being planned? Yes, it was. They hurt her feelings; she felt bruised. It was nonetheless a staged, allegedly written-out scene that required persuasive acting on the part of Brando and Schneider.

Schneider bore the emotional brunt of the scene, obviously. Pretending to endure a sexual assault had to feel traumatic to some extent, even within the realm of trying to sell a made-up, make-believe situation.

Keep in mind that Brando also felt emotionally manipulated and over-exposed in terms of his emotional past, which was used by Bertolucci to give dramatic definition to Paul.

Was it fair for Brando’s soft white underbelly to have been exploited for artistic motives? I think it was. Dramatic acting is not tiddly-winks, and yet Brando resented Bertolucci for having mined his personal childhood saga to produce dramatic dividends. They didn’t speak for quite a few years after Tango was released.

So did Bertolucci do something wrong or dishonorable by extracting strong, distinctive performances from Brando and Schneider, in some ways by manipulation and pushing their personal buttons and whatnot? I don’t think so. Art isn’t easy, and the creation process sometimes involves occasional bruisings and discomfort, especially given the fact that pulling emotional truth out of a person is essential.

What matters at the end of the day is what’s finally on the canvas. What Bertolucci did here and there may have been a bit cruel and hurtful, yes**, but it was done for the right reasons and was hardly a crime against humanity.

** Bertolucci’s manipulations on this film weren’t hugely different from that moment during the Chinatown shoot when Roman Polanski abruptly yanked a couple of strands of stray hair out of Faye Dunaway’s scalp. She was infuriated.

Not every first-rate director is an obsessive, but many are under the surface. The good ones are certainly exacting when it comes to the various details that have to be finessed and arranged just so.