MSNBC’s Eric Lundegaard is calling Mission: Impossible III a “fun movie, the best of the series,” in part because “it gets rid of that awful, floppy Hong Kong hipster haircut Ethan Hunt sported in the [John Woo] film.” If you read his article, you should know in advance that a fairly significant M:I:3 plot spoiler is contained within.
![](/images/column/51206/mi3.jpg)
And yet Lundergaard has written it and it’s out there…whaddaya gonna do? Kids in Mumbai and Fairbanks and Panama City are mulling it over as we speak. SPOILER ALERT: What is Lundergaard’s Big Spill? A traitor-mole is a significant plot element in all three IM films, and going back to the same well over and over is a problem. “Which is why I√ɬ¢√¢‚Äö¬¨√¢‚Äû¬¢m urging Congress to look into IMF,” Lundegaard concludes. “Call a bi-partisan commission. Get Richard Ben-Veniste on the line. Three movies and three traitors is enough.”
![](https://hollywood-elsewhere.com/wp-content/themes/amory/patreon-banner.jpg)