It would have been heavenly if Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation lawsuit against Fox News had gone to trial. “Money is accountability,” of course, but the courtroom drama aspect is gone. Dominion had accused Fox of airing relentless bullshit charges about Dominion having allegedly fixed the results of the 2020 presidential election in Joe Biden‘s favor, and the case looked terrible for Fox and, by extension, Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell and all the other fantasists who had insisted all along that the charges against Dominion had merit.
Alas, Fox and Dominion have settled and the fun factor has been sucked out the room. Fox will pay Dominion $787.5 million, Dominion has said. Over three quarters of a billion dollars.
This is a fairly absurd hypothetical, but let’s imagine that somehow the raw, abrasive verite cop genre (Serpico, Report to the Commissioner, Busting, Prince of the City) never manifested in force during in the ’70s and ’80s, and that The French Connection was an explosive new film in 2023. Same style, same story, younger cast. Would it have a chance of winning the Best Picture Oscar, or would it be dismissed as impossibly racist and coarse and insensitive, etc.?
I know it’s a ridiculous supposition but kick it around anyway.
Note to 87 year-old director William Friedkin: I’ve scolded others about this before, but if you’re an over-70 celebrity interview subject you should never wear gray comfort sneakers or any kind of footwear that says “worn by an old guy because his feet would hurt otherwise.” Even if it hurts you should always wear uptown, expensive-looking, Italian-crafted leather footwear. And you should never wear baggy pants or dad jeans or anything in that realm — stick to fairly tight slacks, the kind that Thierry Fremaux always wears.
Two other things: Friedkin would also look a bit younger if he would wear his usual tinted distance glasses. And he should use a little hair thickener (Crew).
Update: At long last IFC films has finally invited media members to a couple of BlackBerry screenings. The highest profile one is also open to the public — a 7 pm screening at the IFC center on Thursday, May 4th. Director, cowriter and costar Matt Johnson will sit for a post-screening q & a. Pic opens on 5.12.23.
Earlier: It’s been two full months since Matt Johnson‘s BlackBerry played the Berlinale and all kinds of “oh, wow!” responses were heard. Ever since I’ve been gently pestering IFC Films about Manhattan BlackBerry screenings or at least links. The film opens on Friday, May 12th, or three and a half weeks from now. It’s just around the corner and I’ve asked a few critic friends if they’v heard anything…zip. Actually there was a positive tweet yesterday by the Albany-based Lights Camera Jackson (i.e., Jackson Murphy), but I’m not sensing a lot of energy or enthusiasm from IFC Films.
Just screened #BlackBerry. I'll have some full thoughts closer to its May 12th release. For now I'll state that you should message your friends (on whichever device you choose) to make plans to see this in theaters. Jay Baruchel and @GlennHowerton are OUTSTANDING. @IFCFilmspic.twitter.com/AmzlAsnAkR
Despite what happened in Chicago’s Loop district last weekend, which was basically sporadic violent chaos by roving mobs of urban youths, nobody’s allowed to sound too angry or draconian. Chicago Mayor-elect Brandon Johnson warned against demonizing the hordes who smashed car and store windows, beat people up, started bonfires, clashed with cops, etc.
“In no way do I condone the destructive activity we saw in the Loop and lakefront this weekend,” Johnson said. “It is unacceptable and has no place in our city, [but] it is not constructive to demonize youth who have otherwise been starved of opportunities in their own communities.”
Translation: “Many non-white Chicago kids have been leading difficult lives and are understandably hot-tempered and economically frustrated, so we don’t want to racially simplify matters if they trash the Loop district and bust a few heads. We can’t tolerate this kind of thing, but at the same time we need to try and turn the other cheek because decades of political white power structure oppression have had an unfortunate effect.”
Everyone understands that they’re not allowed to say anything that even vaguely resembles alarmist sentiments heard in early April of 2010 after incidents of “wilding” in Times Square, and certainly nothing that resembles what Orange Plague and other riled-up, short-tempered Manhattanites said about the Central Park Five incident (and the wilding that preceded it) in 1989.
The 60th anniversary of the JFK assassination will be upon us before we know it (concurrent, by the way, with the 11.22.23 opening of Ridley Scott’s Napoleon) and I’m asking myself something.
Why after all this time has no one ever suggested that Lenny Bruce may have been on to something when he suggested that Jackie Kennedy was simply, immediately terrified about being shot herself (as anyone would be) and was following a blind instinct to avoid a similar death by getting the hell away from the line of fire by climbing out of the back seat and onto the limousine trunk?
That has always seemed to me like a very natural and default kneejerk response — haul ass in order to save your own terrified, freaked-out ass.
And yet every last person who’s ever analyzed what happened during those fateful seconds in Dealey Plaza…they ALL say she was trying to retrieve a piece of her husband’s skull that had been blown onto the trunk. And maybeshewas, but why has no one ever suggested that Bruce’s interpretation was at the very least a reasonable possibility?
If so, Jackie wasn’t behaving in some cowardly or ignoble fashion. She’d just seen half of JFK’s head — very close, only inches away — explode into blood and skull and brain matter and vapor — soaking her gloves bright red and all that cranial flotsam spraying upon her own face. Naturally she came to a split-second realization that she might be next and immediately thought about saving herself from a similar fate and, not incidentally, staying alive in order to care for her two children.
Would that have been such a terrible instantaneous reaction?
Spike Jonze‘s “Pardon Our Dust” ad (’05) is great and mythical because it’s about something much bigger and deeper than promoting the Gap brand. It’s about rage…rage against monolithic corporate design, against corporate uniformity and control, against wealthy have-it-alls…rage in favor of freedom, anarchy and all-around madness.
It might be the most liberating TV ad I’ve ever seen in my life. And every three or four years I intend to celebrate the fact that it was (a) made and (b) shown a few times (but not often).
Last posted on 4.30.20: HE hereby apologizes to Spike Jonze for having posted the badly-scored version of his landmark 2005 Gap commercial, “Pardon Our Dust,” instead of the correct one.
I’m told that the new Fatal Attraction limited series (Paramount +, 4.30, ten episodes) doesn’t just stretch the plot of Adrian Lyne’s 1987 original by adding new twists and turns and whatnot. It sympathizes with the Alex Forrest character (currently played by Lizzy Caplan, and famously portrayed by Glenn Close 36 years ago) into a traumatized victim with a tortured history while frowning upon Dan Gallagher (played by Michael Douglas in the oldie as a flawed hero-victim, and by jowly-faced Joshua Jackson in the newbie).
Dan, you see, is an entitled white shit who deserves to suffer for catting around.
And therefore the new Fatal Attraction, “developed” by Alexandra Cunningham and Kevin J. Hynes, and directed by Silver Tree (her actual name), has been described as a woke-as-fuck saga in a #MeToo, bad-white-guy sense.
SPOILERS AHEAD: If you’re going to sympathize with Alex you can’t have a boiling bunny, and so no hares or rabbits meet their doom in the Paramount + version. In the first version of Lyne’s original film Alex killed herself (slit her throat with a carving knife) but Dan was nonetheless accused of killing her. In the second version of the ’87 film Alex was shot dead by Anne Archer.
In the new series neither of these things happen. Gallagher is arrested, though (the trailer shows him in prison) and the real murderer….okay, saying no more.
There is, I’ve been told, a whole subtext about how horrible Dan Gallagher is…he did something cruel and selfish by having a fling outside the bonds of marriage, and so he deserves to suffer, as do all older white guys.
On top of which the plot eventually advances 15 years and we learn that Dan’s grown-up daughter (remember the little girl in the ’87 film who looked like a boy, the one whom Glenn Close kidnapped and took to an amusement park?) has a complex about selfish and predatory white males.
You basically need to understand that Dan Gallagher is a bad, rotten, shithead male, and that poor Alex Forrest had been hurt terribly by her father and was just looking for special attention when she had the affair with Dan…she was hurt and crying out, which is how Glenn Close wanted her portrayed in the first place.
Except test audiences who saw the ’87 original hated the suicide ending, and so Lyne re-shot an ending in which Alex-the-witch invades the Gallagher home and is shot to death.
The great F. Murray Abraham has sadly followed in the footsteps of Frank Langella, Bill Murray, Paul Haggis…slapped down, disciplined, jettisoned,…another guy who either doesn’t understand or refuses to acknowledge the new #Me Too rules.
Older guys refuse to understand that in the eyes of Millennial and Zoomer women, they are deer….antlered deer who deserve to get shot and mounted on the wall if they do the slightest objectionable thing.
HE: Another old guy goes down….they don’t get it, they won’t get it. Friendo: You know there’s a decent chance this is bullshit HE: He probably did something innocuous by 20th Century standards, but alarm-bellish by Zoomer or Millennial standards. Friendo: He probably complimented someone on being pretty or looking good. HE: Maybe patted their back, hugged them, gave them a peck on the cheek. Friendo: No man is going to “do” anything intentionally bad right now. Management doesn’t want to get sued so they fired him…safer that way.
The restored Rio Bravo, which premiered late last week at the TCM Classic Film Festival, is currently streaming on Max in 4K UHD. I just watched about a half-hour’s worth, and there’s NOTHING extra or bumpy about it. It looks fine, but it doesn’t add any fresh clarity or deeper blacks or anything. Not to my eyes, it doesn’t.
Friendo: “Streaming is storming. It should look fine. The original camera negative, beyond fading, was basically near pristine. Look at the highlights in Dean Martin’s hair. If you see blue, it’s off the faded neg. If not, it’s been corrected. That’s your easiest tell.”
One of my biggest complaints about Rio Bravo is that the ornery cowpokes inside the saloon look like actors who’ve been dressed by a professional costumer. Especially Claude Akins, who plays the evil and arrogant Joe Burdette. Look at what he’s wearing — striped pants, a new black wide-brim hat, a freshly pressed olive green shirt with three buttons on the shirt cuffs, and an expensive cowhide vest. He looks like he bought his western duds at Nudie’s.
…a friend passed along a Cinecitta anecdote from no less a personage than Charlton Heston. Heston had told him “that the majority of shots were taken from a single side of the set, to simplify camera placements.” Oh, for God’s sake!
HE reply: “Be that as it may…okay, fine. But why in heaven’s name would William Wyler build a full-sized stadium and arena with a huge middle island with those four kneeling warrior sculptures…a massive, full-sized stadium and chariot racetrack with acres and acres of room on all sides…why build this massive outdoor set if the plan was to mainly use one side of the racetrack for filmimg?
“Common visual logic (i.e., the attached photos) tell us there were no physical obstructions or logistical advantages to emphasizing one side or the other…talk about an illogical scenario.
1st AD to Wyler: “Uhm, Willy, we’ve taken a hard look at things and the ample size and massive scale of this hugely expensive outdoor set notwithstanding, we’ve figured it’ll be simpler to mainly shoot on just one side of the arena.” Wyler to 1st AD: “You’re fired.”
BTW: This morning I re-watched the chariot race sequence from the 1926 version of Ben-Hur, and there’s a great shot around the 2.25 mark that Wyler’s 1959 version didn’t have. It was apparently taken from inside a dug-in hole in the track, and shows several chariots thundering directly overhead.
