Last night’s big “what?” moment happened when Music by Prudence won the Best Documentary Short Oscar. Director-producer Roger Ross Williams ran to the stage like an Olympic sprinter and began to say thanks. And then producer Elinor Burkett darted in and pretty much grabbed the mike and took over the shpiel, obviously to Williams’ chagrin. Salon’s Kerry Lauerman reports the story from both parties:

Salon: “People are already saying you ‘pulled a Kanye.’ What happened?”

Burkett: “What happened was the director and I had a bad difference over the direction of the film that resulted in a lawsuit that has settled amicably out of court. But there have been all these events around the Oscars, and I wasn’t invited to any of them. And he’s not speaking to me. So we weren’t even able to discuss ahead of the time who would be the one person allowed to speak if we won. And then, as I’m sure you saw, when we won, he raced up there to accept the award. And his mother took her cane and blocked me. So I couldn’t get up there very fast.”

Salon: “Can you explain the reason behind the conflict?”

Burkett: “The movie was supposed to be about the entire band, Liyana. And the [band members] were very clear they did not want to participate if it ended up being just about one person. The director and HBO decided to focus solely on Prudence.

Salon: “And that led to the rift. But didn’t you see him at other events to discuss what would happen if you won?”

Burkett: “He won’t talk to me! This whole week, there have been events thrown by the International Documentary Association, and he hasn’t passed any of the invitations on to me. The movie was my idea. I live in Zimbabwe. Roger had never even heard of Zimbabwe before I told him about this. And you know, I felt my role in this has been denigrated again and again, and it wasn’t going to happen this time.

Salon: “How do you feel about the final product?”

Burkett: “The final product…it’s not that it’s bad. It’s not what I envisioned when I came up with this project. And it’s not what we promised the boys in the band. It’s just not what we wanted it to be.:

Salon then spoke to Williams….

Salon: “So what happened?”

Williams: “Only one person is allowed to accept the award. I was the director, and she was removed from the project nearly a year ago, but she was able to still qualify as a producer on the project, and be an official nominee. But she was very angry — she actually removed herself from the project – because she wanted more creative control.”

Salon: “But couldn’t you decide ahead of time who would speak?

Williams: “That was handled by the publicist for the academy. I don’t know what they told her. The academy is very clear that only one person can speak. I own the film. She has no claim whatsoever. She has nothing to do with the movie. She just ambushed me. I was sort of in shock.”

Salon: “You seemed to run up there pretty fast. Didn’t you see her coming up the aisle? What did you think was going to happen when she got there?

Williams: “I just expected her to stand there. I had a speech prepared.”

Salon: “She claims she found the movie’s story, that she brought it to you.”

Williams: “No, not at all. The truth is that she saw the band perform [in Zimbabwe], and told me about that, and then I opened up a dialogue with the [King George VI School & Centre for Children with Physical Disabilities] school and went on my own – which you would’ve heard about in my speech — and spent $6,000 going to Africa shooting myself. And when people expressed interest in the film, I asked her to come on board. And then I regretted that decision. Then she sued.”

Salon: “It was quite a tussle. Does this diminish the Oscar at all?”

Williams: “Absolutely not. It’s such a career achievement, to win an Academy Award. This is what the business is. There are times when there’s disagreement and dispute and you always hope that people will rise up to the occasion. It doesn’t diminish it. She disowns it and doesn’t want any part of the film. I’m so proud of the movie.”

Salon: “Did your mother try and block her with her cane?”

Williams: “My mother got up to hug me. And my mother is 87 years old. She was excited.”

Hollywood Elsewhere interjection: Probable bunk! Whenever a child points out the age of a parent in the course of explaining any sort of curious or unusual altercation, what they’re saying is “yes, my parent acted questionably but you have to cut him/her some slack because old people tend to be confused and don’t know what they’re doing half the time.” Which of course is rarely true. Old people are plenty aware of what’s going on at any given moment. They just tend to be a little gruffer or grumpier.