Todd Haynes‘ I’m Not There, about the life and legend of Bob Dylan, “explores different pockets of a man who refused to be categorized. I have always loved his music, but I’m terrified about this because I am besotted. I watch the press conference he gave in San Francisco in 1965, or whenever it was, and just think, ‘I love you.’

“The worst thing an actor can do is fall in love with someone they’re about to portray, but then I’m not playing him — my character is called Jude. [The film is] a riff on who Dylan could possibly be. When I saw the script I thought, ‘This is so out there I can’t run away from this.” — from a Cate Blanchett interview by Guardian‘s Mark Salisbury.

With the O’Toole bandwagon slowing to a stall (especially if he winds up staying in London), the Best Actor Oscar face-down is pretty much down to Leonardo DiCaprio (The Departed, Blood Diamond) vs. Will Smith (The Pursuit of Happyness) — and it seems more and more likely to me that DiCaprio will take it.

The DiCaprio undersaga-metaphor is about a gifted kid-like actor finally surging into the realm of manhood and mature conviction, so a vote for Leo is a vote for a potential finally fulfulled. A vote for Smith is a vote for the idea that a practiced smoothie can get down and find something deeper and fuller in his craft as well as himself. On this they’re more or less evenly matched.
But DiCaprio has the edge because he nailed it twice this year, and because The Departed is at the top of nearly everyone’s list. In the long run The Pursuit of Happyness is going to outpoint Blood Diamond (which is going to get dinged when it opens next Friday), but the feeling is that the former lacks the dramatic chops and gravitas to springboard Smith into a higher standing and keep the ball rolling into February. The reason the O’Toole/Venus thing is sagging is because it’s all about the past, and because O’Toole is being kept from projecting a present-tense, here-I-am, onward-and-upward profile. It’s a tough game.

“Mel Gibson‘s self-financed passion project was originally budgeted through his Icon Productions at $64 million. Despite the twofold increase in shooting days, that initial figure has been whittled down to $50 million for public record. However, production execs who worked on and or regularly visited the set estimate Apocalypto‘s actual budget is closer to $75 million to $80 million.” — from Sheigh Crabtree‘s L.A. Times piece on the making of it.

This site has bonged the gong on Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck‘s The Lives of Others several times, but yesterday’s announcement that it won three top European Film Awards awards — Best Picture, Best Actor (Ulrich Muhe) and Best Screenwriter (von Donnersmarck) — brings it to the fore again.

This Sony Pictures Classics release has the current of greatness in it — a subdued but passionate story, arresting specificity of observation and recreation in every last department, superb acting (Sebastian Koch and Martina Gedeck especially), ripe adult sexuality and a truly heartening finale.
Pedro Almodovar‘s Volver also cleaned up at the European Film Awards — Pedro for Best Drector, Penelope Cruz for Best Actress, Jos√É∆í√Ǭ© Luis Alcaine for Best Cinematography, Alberto Iglesias for Best Musical Score as well as the recipient of the People’s Choice Award for Best European Film.

A nicely observed, soothingly written piece by L.A. Times writer Rachel Abramowitz about the frail Peter O’Toole and his Oscar-touted performance as Maurice in Roger Michell‘s Venus . It hits just the right tone, a slight underlayer of sadness suffused with the usual O’Toole-isms — wit, pluck, offhanded charm.

Is O’Toole’s Best Actor Oscar campaign, such as it is, going to be conducted from London? A few days ago I noted certain indications of concern. I tried to get a reading of the situation from Miramax publicity before writing anything, but they didn’t want to discuss it. And now David Poland has written that Abramowitz’s sit-down happened “before nterviews started being cancelled even for those willing to cross the ocean to talk to the ailing Oscar candidate.”

This BBC Radio TV spot — a clip of Elvis Presley circa 1970 introducing his back-up band during a concert — has been up about a month. It’s almost perfect — I especially like the bit when Keith Moon interrupts the shpiel. The one tiny wrongo is that brief clip of bassist Sheryl Crowe — she’s seen playing as he introduces her, but we don’t hear any music.

Another Sundance ’07 selection worth settling into is one I’ve seen (in rough form): Rod Lurie‘s Resurrecting the Champ. I’m not going to spill anything, but the script — written by Lurie, Allison Burnett, Michael Bortman and Chris Gerolmo — has a fascinating second-act turn. The nominal plot is about a youngish, not quite established sports reporter (Josh Hartnett) lucking into a big story when he discovers that a squealy-voiced homeless guy (Samuel L. Jackson) is actually a former heavyweight boxing champion previously thought to be dead. But the title doesn’t mean what you might think. Alan Alda and Peter Coyote give tangy supporting performances.

I didn’t exactly take part in this morning’s round-table interviews at the Waldorf Astoria this morning for The Good German (Warner Bros., 12.15); “sat in on” is more like it. I wasn’t feeling the moxie for some reason. But at least I recorded a couple of lively, light-hearted interviews with George Clooney and Cate Blanchett. Amusing machine-gun stuff, some of it informative and even thoughtful.

After the sessions ended, in an 18th floor suite of the Waldorf Astoria — Saturday, 12.2.06, 1:15 pm

You need to be on-your-toes to get a question in edgewise at a typical session, which usually happens around a table-clothed round table that seats maybe 9 or 10 journalists. It’s always about nail-gunning your question at just the right instant (i.e., just as the celebrity is saying the last couple of words of the final sentence of his/her reply). This time,however, the interview tables were at least 30 feet long — Henry the VIII banquet tables — with maybe 20 or 25 journalists firing questions at the “talent” — Clooney, Blanchett, director Steven Soderbergh, screenwriter Paul Attanasio. And the competition was extra-fierce.
Clooney always delivers at these things. He’s going to be the same glib and grin- ning smoothie for the next 20 or 30 years — always between-the-lines thoughtful, never giving you a tape-recorded answer, never inconsiderate…the self-effacing hyphenate. Soderbergh and Attanasio were fine (and I don’t mean that to sound dismissive). But Blanchett was extraordinary. Honestly? I stared at her more than I listened.
It’s obvious within a minute or two that she’s living deep in her own realm. One with little electric cracks of lightning. She looks down and does little fidgety things — pulling her weddng ring on and off, drawing a doodle on a note pad — when she’s listening to a question. It’s not that she’s shy or avoids eye contact, but a lot of the time she talks to the tabletop or her eyes dart around as she’s answering. (Always a mark of a fine creative mind.) Plus it’s been a while since I’ve heard her native Australian accent. She’s done so many different accents recently she could be channelling the Meryl Streep of the ’80s.

The longest table I’ve ever sat at for a group interview in my life — I was rescued from the far end by a kindly Warner Bros. publicist and put into another room.

I don’t know if Nikki Finke‘s report that Mel Gibson‘s Apocalypto is tracking a little bit ahead of Ed Zwick‘s Blood Diamond and Nancy Meyers‘ The Holiday is “astonishing,” as she puts it. Apparently the fans of Mel’s The Passion of the Christ are favorably disposed on some level. Translation: they almost certainly haven’t read or heard much about Apocalypto except for the bare bones stuff, but are thinking it might have some spiritually appealing current (wrong!) and are therefore grunting in the affirmative when the phone surveyor mentions the title and who directed it.

A strange call by Cate Blanchett (or her people) to back out of doing a photo shoot for the annual Vanity Fair Hollywood issue, as reported by Jossip. Strange because during the one- or two-day period when this issue first makes the rounds and (briefly) affects a certain percentage of industry types, a truly luscious high-style photo of an actress tends to underline and double-ratify her elegant X-factor intrigue rating.

If you’re generally regarded as, say, an 8.2 on the desirability meter based on your own steam, appearing in the Vanity Fair Hollywood issue (providing, of course, that the photo hits exactly the right note, as the photos in this issue tend to do about 90% of the time) automatically kicks you up at least .5 percentage points. For one or two days, I mean…after which everything settles down and finds its own level again. But amazing things can happen within those one or two days.
Jossip reports that Blanchett’s “official excuse for leaving Graydon Carter‘s mag behind is that she has a “scheduling conflict’ — which, of course, is bullshit. The only speculation Jossip managed to dig up is that she “may be sticking by Babel co-star Brad Pitt, who’s on rocky terms with the rag after it managed to turn him into a cover story through a backdoor ‘Art Issue’ excuse.” Memo to Jossip editors: it’s spelled “femme fatale,” not “femme fatal.”
Update: I asked Blanchett about this at today’s Good German junket round table, and she said she knew nothing about it.