Well, not really. My heart always goes out to the rugged individualist fighting the entrenched powers-that-be. It’s just that Finke’s vibe and manner puts that belief system to the test. I used to think “well, she may be a strange duck but she’s a hard-charging go-getter and a necessary component.” Now I’m just sick of her. I don’t wish her ill. She can do or say what she wants. But if Finke were to disappear I wouldn’t feel that badly about her absence.

This looks like harmless dumb-ass fun, except any movie that works strenuously to talk you out of believing in the basic elements (story, characters, action sequences) is all but impossible to have fun with. Just put a little bit of effort into selling this as a piece that could actually happen on some level…that’s all I ask. Just put a little elbow grease into selling the plausibility. No? Can’t do it? Just want to shoot it and quit it and cash the check and go home to the ranch? If you wanna play it that way, fine. You just won’t get guys like me to cheer along. Not that fans of this stupid franchise give a damn what Hollywood Elsewhere thinks. They’re cretins for the most part, and I’m saying this as a fan of Sylvester Stallone’s 2008 Rambo film.

If you live in Los Angeles or New York, James Ward Byrkit‘s cerebral but quite chilling Coherence is the film to see this weekend. Definitely. Anyone can make an “uh-oh, something’s not right, weird things are happening” movie, but the trick is to make one that doesn’t devolve into the usual screams and shocks and knives and axes. You can call Coherence a sci-fi thriller of sorts, but it’s really about the power of dark suggestion and clever writing and how a talented group of actors can make a preposterous idea feel not just plausible but — this is the really odd part as far as my own reaction was concerned — vaguely threatening.

I watched it last night, alone in a motel room, through a private Vimeo link on my Macbook Air, and I honestly felt a tiny bit creeped out. I made sure the door was locked. I avoided looking in the mirror. I knew this feeling would pass but I was surprised that I felt unnerved in the first place.

Today Criterion announced that a brand spanking new Bluray/DVD of Roman Polanski‘s Macbeth (4K digital restoration with a recently-produced making-of doc featuring an interview with Polanski) will street on 9.23.14. I’ve seen my share of Macbeths (including the notoriously panned 1980 Peter O’Toole stage version at the Old Vic), and the Polanski is my hands-down, all-time fave. The Criterion disc will precede Justin Kurzel‘s somewhat dumbed-down Macbeth, a Weinstein Co. release costarring Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard, by at least a couple of months. The IMDB says it may open in November or December.

“Therein, the patient must minister to himself.”

I love this drinking glass, which I sipped out of during a luncheon in Cannes two or three weeks ago. A day or two ago I showed this photo to a friend and asked if she’d be interested in having a glass or two like this in her cupboard. She almost got angry at the idea. “Why would I want a ridiculous thing like that….what, so people would think I was cool or something?” No, I said. You would want one, I would think, because it is cool. What she meant, I think, is that she doesn’t like any aspect of her life, even a fucking drinking glass, to be tilting or off-balance or anything but perfectly level. That’s precisely why I like it and why I’d like to buy a couple here in the States if I can find a way to buy them online or however.

Last Saturday (i.e., two days ago) I attended a Fox Searchlight press event at L.A.’s The Grove to promote the 6.17 release of the Grand Budapest Hotel Bluray, and more particularly to celebrate an all-Lego replica of the fictional hotel that was built by Ryan Ziegelbauer and a team of eight model builders. It took them 575 hours but it looks great. Ziegelbauer and Tony Revolori (who plays lobby boy Zero Moustafa in the film) posed for shots and gave interviews to a small group of journos. Honestly? I was into the Lego inventiveness but I was also hoping to snag a complimentary Bluray of the film. Nothing happened then and there, but a copy is arriving on my doorstep tomorrow. (Thanks, guys!) An after-reception was held at Morel’s French Steakhouse and Bistro, and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t at least partly interested in some free vittles. But nothing was served except for little bowls of slightly-warmer-than-room-temperature French fries along with some kind of hors d’oeuvre that tasted a bit icky. I waited around for another 20 or so minutes and then unobtrusively slipped out.

(l.) Grand Budapest Hotel Lego architect/foreman/designer Ryan Ziegelbauer, (r.) Tony Revolori — Saturday, 6.14, 11:10 am.

I’m telling you right now I don’t want to see a movie about how Bowe Bergdahl was some kind of gentle, perceptive anti-war humanist who found the courage not to fight in Afghanistan any more and to abandon his post only to be captured by the Taliban, etc. No offense but I really don’t want to see anything like this. And I don’t want to see a movie about a dork who lives on his own planet either. I’m mentioning this because Deadline‘s Mike Fleming is reporting that two Bergdahl projects are gearing up, one from Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty partners Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal, and another one from Fox Searchlight with Todd Field (In The Bedroom, Little Children) attached to direct. The Field project will apparently be based on “America’s Last Prisoner Of War“, an investigative article by the late Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings.

No issues with Edgar Ramirez, a charismatic, first-rate actor who’s proved his mettle in Carlos and Zero Dark Thirty. I would simply prefer a biopic of Simon Bolivar as directed by Steven Soderbergh or Olivier Assayas. The Liberator “is a respectable, sprawling endeavor that covers nearly three decades of tumultuous events in the life of Simon Bolivar,” wrote Variety‘s Dennis Harvey. “Yet it lacks that essential spark that would turn it into a great biopic rather than a competent one, and make history seem alive rather than merely illustrated.”

Here’s a respectful but less than enthusiastic review from Hollywood Reporter critic Todd McCarthy.

In response to last week’s arrival of a hooded sweatshirt promoting Bennett Miller‘s Foxcatcher (i.e., the very first Oscar swag package of the 2014/15 Oscar season), allow me to slightly amend or modify the first paragraph of my initial Foxcatcher review, which I posted from Cannes on 5.22.

Amended version: “Speaking as a devoted admirer of Bennett Miller‘s Capote and Moneyball, it gives me no particular pleasure to state that Foxcatcher is a very well crafted, psychologically acute downer of a murder saga. Why play games or mince words? It’s obviously a quality package, but it’s not about fun and games. There’s no doubt that Foxcatcher is very strong and precise and clean, especially as crime dramas tend to go. And I respect the fact that it contains undercurrents that stay with you, and I certainly respect and admire what Miller has done here with his deft and subtle hand.

The last time I checked Isis was an ancient Egyptian goddess. Right now, of course, ISIS is an out-for-blood army of Islamic fundamentalist wackos who’ve taken over most of Iraq and are almost certain to capture Baghdad sooner or later. What’s happening right now in Iraq is obviously similar to the situation in South Vietnam in April 1975, when North Vietnamese forces had overtaken the country and surrounded Saigon. We might as well face it — the extremist nutters are about to win and woe to their enemies, particularly Iraq’s prime minister Nouri al-Maliki and his governmental allies (not to mention any and all American contractors doing business with the Maliki administration). On 6.14 The Guardian‘s Jason Burke posted an article explaining how Malicki is pretty much to blame for what’s happening over there. The United States always trips over the same rock. Time and again our government backs corrupt, business-friendly despots who are mainly out to line their own pockets. We never hook up with nativist movements. And then the inevitable chickens come home to roost. It’s going to be ugly when ISIS comes to town. Executions, severed heads, arterial blood spurtings, etc. “One former associate of Maliki, now based in London, pointed out that few rulers of Iraq leave power peacefully or, indeed, alive,” Burke writes. “This is something, he says, of which the prime minister is acutely aware.”

It might as well be faced — Clint Eastwood‘s Jersey Boys is looking at choppy if not rough seas from a critical perspective. And, if you believe the tracking, from a commercial perspective also. But let’s stick to the critical for now. Not that anyone is rooting for a flop. Eastwood’s reluctance to direct a standard uptempo jukebox musical deserves respect. But you can smell the discomfort out there.

On one hand, TheWrap‘s Alonso Duralde says that “if you’re a fan of harmonic 1960s pop, or cars with fins, Jersey Boys will provide a nice evening out at the movies. It’s nice. It’s entertaining. It’s pleasant. It’s all the positive adjectives that mean ‘not terrible but ultimately negligible.’ It fulfills the duties of a jukebox musical: it works in the hits, and it casts singers who make those hits sound virtually identical to the original versions. What the movie doesn’t do is answer the question, ‘Why did I just spend 134 minutes watching the Frankie Valli episode of Behind the Music?'”

On the somewhat more compassionate side, The Hollywood Reporter‘s Todd McCarthy writes that “a dash of showbiz pizzazz has been lost but some welcome emotional depth has been gained. If the ultimate aim of the Broadway musical version was to get the audience on its feet for the final feel-good medley, Eastwood goes for a more mixed mood, combining the joy of the music with what Valli, in particular, lost and cold never regain. Still, commercial uncertainties attach to the potential interest of young viewers unfamiliar with the band and [a] musical milieu of a half-century ago.”