Day: May 7, 2006

A DaVinci dispatch from a journalist friend called “Deep Pope,” to wit: “I have a pet theory that The Da Vinci Code may be in some kind of trouble. At the very least, Sony seems to be worried about it.

The studio is shopping around an inordinate number of advance interviews for the film, it seems to me. Paul Bettany, Ian McKellen, Alfred Molina and Akiva Goldsman are being offered to journalists for interviews, but the catch is, you can’t see the movie yet. So you have to ask questions based on knowledge of the book and what you’ve see in the trailer. Suggests to me that maybe Sony doesn’t want the movie compared to the book too soon. Plus members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association are being shown 35 minutes of the film tomorrow (i.e., Monday, 5.8). They’re then getting a sit-down with Tom Hanks — don’t know if it’s a press conference or round table. Is it necessary to stroke the HFPA members outside of Golden Globes season? Why the preferential treatment for this film? Surely no one at Sony thinks there will be any Oscars out of Da Vinci Code? Or are they just trying to goose whatever global press the HFPA can scare up before word gets out on the movie? Does any of this seem normal to you? They didn’t do this for Spider-Man, as I recall.”

I spoke to Heath Ledger after Universal’s post-Golden Globes party at the Beverly Hilton last January, and he said that the plan — his and Michelle Williams’, that is — was to take a year off (huddle-down time with the baby) and possibly move to Amsterdam. Now comes news that Ledger will replace Colin Farrell in the lead role in Todd Haynes‘ I’m Not There , a movie about Bob Dylan that’ll start filming this summer . There goes Ledger’s vacation, right? Six actors will play Dylan in the film — Ledger, Richard Gere and Christian Bale are but three of them.

The trade reviews of Poseidon — Brian Lowry‘s in Variety and Sheri Linden‘s in the Hollywood Reporter — both complain about the lack of character shading and/or revelation and the generally streamlined approach. They don’t seem to get it. It’s a good thing that Poseidon cuts to the chase and is over in 100 minutes or so. Nobody wants emotionalism or depth of character slowing things down or gumming things up.

I was sufficiently engaged, aroused, riveted by Poseidon when I saw it on a modest-sized screen on the Warner Bros. lot a while back, so I’m figuring (okay, hoping) I’ll be extra-charged when I see on an IMAX screen on Tuesday, 5.9, at the AMC Leows Lincoln Square.

“The more troubling conclusion” regarding the disappointing Mission: Impossible II weekend earnings “could well be the much-discussed cultural shift in the way we see movies,” says MCN box-office analyst Len Klady. “The 20% theatrical decline may find itself shifting into ancillary revenue arenas, and if that’s the case what can be expected for upcoming summer releases and future production plans by the majors?”

Fair warning: I’m coming out with a piece a week from today about the Death System in disaster films (i.e., who dies in these movies, and why?), with a particular focus on a possible reason for two significant departures-expirations in Poseidon. The article will run Sunday evening, 5.14. I’m saying this now because it’ll involve a spoiler (two of them, actually), and I don’t want to hear any complaints.

“And pity the poor actors [in Poseidon] who suffered from vertigo as they had to navigate their way across a narrow plank high above the ground with flames licking their heels. ‘It was not for the faint of heart,’ [a production associate] says. Instead of having nets below, the actors were attached from above to safety cables, which won’t be visible on film.” — from Robert Welkos‘s L.A. Times piece (5.7) on the making of Wolfgang Petersen’s Poseidon , which opens Friday (5.12). “Pity the poor actors”? It’s apparently time once again to repeat something that Werner Herzog has been saying for a long time, which is that nobody out there pities the poor actors or anyone else who has worked on a big-studio film because nobody believes in the reality of anything they’re seeing on-screen these days, least of all eye-popping effects in big-budget films. Alongside William Goldman‘s famous “nobody knows anything” line, there should be another line about big-scale visual effects: “Nobody believes anything.”

In what is being called “the latest Vatican broadside” upon Ron Howard‘s The Da Vinci Code (Columbia, 5.19), Cardinal Francis Arinze, a Nigerian who was apparently a leading candidate for pope last year, has said in a new documentary that Christians should sue the filmmakers and Columbia Pictures as well as Dan Brown and the original “DaVinci Code” book publisher because these parties offend…zzzzz. The anti-DaVinci doc, due to be screened in Rome just before the 5.16 debut of The DaVinci Code in Cannes and elsewhere, is called The Da Vinci Code — A Masterful Deception. Howard has said in response, “”This is a work of fiction that presents a set of characters that are affected by these conspiracy theories and ideas. Those characters in this work of fiction act and react on that premise. It’s not theology. It’s not history. To start off with a disclaimer….” he searches for the right words. “Spy thrillers don’t start off with disclaimers.”

I just got into Manhattan a couple of hours ago, and I went right to the local bodega and picked up a copy of Sunday’s New York Post, and I saw this on the lower-left portion of the front page…

And one of the first messages I got after turning on the computer was from a friend of the film at Paramount, who reminded me that (a) M:I:3 is “Cruise’s third highest domestic opening, and that (b) the “worldwide opening weekend number is $118 million, which is up from MI2.”

Hollywood Interrupted‘s Mark Ebner is, of course, a well-known Scientology “watcher” (i.e., a euphemism for an ardent disliker), which means he probably hears from others who feel as he does, which in itself casts doubt upon this second-hand observation, posted today: “Hollywood, Interrupted just received an eyewitness report from a moviegoer who, while purchasing tickets for a Mission: Imposssible II show on Friday, May 5th, saw a woman in front of him in the ticket line purchase 900 tickets at a cost of just shy of $9,000 — all for the Church of Scientology. An ArcLight guest services rep would not confirm whether or not an excessive ticket purchase like that was made.” The reason I’m running it is because there was a seemingly verified report of someone trying to fix the results of a Parade magazine poll about whether Cruise’s image troubles were self-generated or caused by the media. Parade publicist Alexis Collado told “Page Six”, “We found out more than 14,000 (of the 18,000-plus votes) that came in were cast from only 10 computers…one computer was responsible for nearly 8,400 votes alone, all blaming the media for Tom’s troubles.”

Hollywood Elsewhere is taking the Fung-Wah bus from Boston to New York today, so nothing will post between now and 7 pm or 8 pm eastern.