HE will submit to Superman early Wednesday evening. I will post a fair and balanced review by 10 or 11 pm tomorrow night.
Written by the San Francisco Chronicle‘s G. Allen Johnson:
The first thing you need to know about James Gunn’s version of Superman is that he can be hurt and he can bleed without the presence of kryptonite, which makes you wonder if he’s even Superman at all.
The second is that he has a superdog, Krypto, which raises a lot of questions. Did this dog stow away on baby Superman’s spaceship before the planet Krypton exploded? If so, is he immortal, because he’d be about 30 years old, or 210 in dog years? And why isn’t he yet out of his puppy phase?
Superman operates as an almost parody of the superhero genre, which may be appealing to some. It has the same silliness of Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy movies, which are some of the best films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but that irreverence doesn’t fit the Superman character.
Superman, created by writer Jerry Siegel and artist Joe Shuster for Action Comics #1 in 1938, is not just any ole superhero. He’s special, a moral avatar in shifting times.
In 2025’s Superman, which is far from the worst Superman movie but also far from the best, he is merely another interchangeable caped crusader in an era, whether it be DC or the MCU, in which every other superhero with arrested development can do all the things Superman can do.
A very serviceable David Corenswet assumes the cape and his alter ego Clark Kent, the Daily Planet reporter who is barely in this movie. Rachel Brosnahan (The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) is Lois Lane, who, as the movie opens, already knows Clark is Superman.
One of the pleasures of the movie is they actually seem hot for each other; there are a couple of erotic kisses that are quite unusual in this era of asexual superheroes, although it must be said that in 1981’s Superman II Christopher Reeve’s Supe and Margot Kidder’s Lois actually made love within misting distance of Niagara Falls.
You might be wondering about the plot. Same here. (HE interjection: Funny!)
It involves Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult of Juror #2 and Nosferatu) essentially keeping Superman distracted by smearing him on social media and unleashing creatures, including a Godzilla-like lizard, on Metropolis while Luthor engineers a war in the Middle East.
Social media and screens in general are big in Superman, with citizens of Metropolis taking selfies with attacking creatures in the background, making one wonder if any of them deserve to be saved. Even the ultimate man cave, Superman’s Fortress of Solitude, is outfitted like a gamer’s paradise.
Of course, these days there can’t be just one superhero in a movie. You have to expand your universe, so popping up as the plot dictates is the Green Lantern (a badly miscast Nathan Fillion in a badly miscast blond wig), Mr. Terrific (Edi Gathegi) and Hawkgirl (Isabela Merced of The Last of Us).
Given that these films take years to make, it’s chilling how many scenes reflect current reality. The Middle East war between the fictional Boravia and Jarhanpur seems very reminiscent of the Israel-Hamas conflict. At one point, Superman is arrested by masked agents and, because he is an immigrant, is stripped of due process and shipped off to a foreign prison.
Those prescient scenes make the movie sound better than it is. Gunn is so focused on eye candy and swirling activity that he glosses over the human element, aside from those Lois-Clark smooches and one nice scene between Clark and his parents (Pruitt Taylor Vince and Neva Howell). Wasted is Perry White (Wendell Pierce) and Jimmy Olsen (Skyler Gisondo), though it’s nice to see that the Daily Planet still values their print edition.
Superman is a mess, but it’s a colorful one. It’s either a terrible superhero movie or an OK parody. Take your pick.
